My journal with poker botting

[victorbot]

Hi guys, I?m Victor. I have been reading money making forums since more than 2 years and I have decided to register in this forum (the best one IMO) to share my journal with poker botting.
Some time ago I started using a poker bot and I coded my own poker profile. Since then I have improved my earnings and now I?m earnings around 150$ / month. I know that?s not a big amount for most of you, but it?s more than the minimum salary in Ukraine and I?m quite happy with that.

I want to share some of my latest graphs:

pokerprolabs.com/players/hintnenit/888.com


My goal is to reach to 500$ / month. I will post here often to tell you how the things are going.
Wish me luck mates.

 

[tonybao]

Good luck mate! Keep updated .

 

[jamie3000]

Jesus $150 is minimum salary there!? What is average salary? You guys can live off nothing there, minimum in uk is $1500 ish, average $3300 monthly. Everything is so expensive here

 

[jamie3000]

I remember seeing this picture once of a dude who had 10 computers running poker bots. Is it easy to scale? Do you think the companies can detect it?

 

[vortez]

You could try scaling it by getting some vps.

 

[sripsam]

In my experience, experienced players can detect the patterns of a poker bot easily and lead him into traps. Yes, also on micro bet tables. That's where a lot of sharks hang out.
Perhaps things have changed, i don't know.

 

[IAmFromTheInternet]

Most sites can detect it despite regular stealth methods, you have to program it to have natural breaks at random times, not play too many hours per day, dedicated servers, heavy stealth with multiple VM's and actually scraping the virtual machine, the more popular sites like Pokerstars, Partypoker have advanced ways to detect mouse movements so you need a simulator with human behavior for that as well.

Not easy, on some smaller sites you still get away with it but lack of volume (tables / games) is often a problem too scale up big time.

It probably takes about the same amount of hours to develop a solid poker game. One that you can actually use in casinos too

 

[jak19]

good luck mate hope you scale it

 

[cyrusmoney]

Amazing actually you have to really emulate mouse movements since pokerstars for example use mouse movement and times has 2 variables to generate random cards. (of course they use other stuff server side actually i know how it work fully). Its a cool system because dont make you think "I shoud play this hand" Your actions with mouse and time actually change the destiny of an hand but its impossible to predict. Anyway is not ilegal to use shortcuts.
Good luck and keep us update.

 

[Flipper21]

Interested in journey. Thanks for posting it here

 

[Letstalkbusiness24]

Will you please share the bot with us?

 

[Worldwidebacklinks]

Interesting thread, any good forums etc on this? I can imagine it would be a risky but autopilot, scaleable earner. Best of luck!

 

[T0NYS]

ohh my ahhahah , before some months I was playin poker , it was a table with 2 seats only , I was playin with a bot , bluffed the bot all the time and went like $400+ in 20-40 minutes , once I bluffed the bot for $200 I guess , and this motherfucker raised ahhahaha I still do remember that shit , anyway good luck and what I would recommned its to play on small tables

 

[waver407]

is gambling online with a bot risky in anyway? :O it sounds like it will be consistent till one month someone abuses your bot and you drop your income like it's hot. lol

 

[jpy295]

I remember seeing this picture once of a dude who had 10 computers running poker bots. Is it easy to scale? Do you think the companies can detect it?

honestly man, even if the companies could detect it.. i would highly doubt they would do anything about it... More players for them= more rake. (especially from a bot, which makes very very very standard plays... standard plays+long duration at the tables=high rake)

 

[jamie3000]

honestly man, even if the companies could detect it.. i would highly doubt they would do anything about it... More players for them= more rake. (especially from a bot, which makes very very very standard plays... standard plays+long duration at the tables=high rake)

Very interesting thought man. Its kinda similar to the whole twitter blocking bots, I've got tons of bots running that are easily detectable because they don't evaluate java script and I was thinking for ages why the hell are they not killing these accounts...then I saw what percentage of accounts security experts think are actually bots on twitter and how every time the twitter user base growth rate slows down it knocks a lot off their share price. They want the bots as long as they're not too spammy.