Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter strawlink
- Start date
- Status
Hey, Your order has completed and Report has sent to your email
Hey, Samples have been given via PM
Hi. How is my order doing ?
Hey, Samples have been given via PM
25% Special discount available
Coupon code: Winter25
Order url: http://linkscezy.com/super-web2.0/
Coupon code: Winter25
Order url: http://linkscezy.com/super-web2.0/
Thanks for your order, Your order received and its processed.
bigballin6161
Senior Member
- Jul 16, 2011
- 1,139
- 431
Can I see sample?
Hi, I have sent you samples via PM
Hi, I have sent you samples via PM
Hi, I have sent you samples via PM
trevormorley
Regular Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 250
- 88
Can I see sample please, thanks
- May 11, 2014
- 2,146
- 2,063
Hello, send me a sample plz
wriper
Supreme Member
- Jul 31, 2011
- 1,206
- 320
My Review .
After discussion with OP i have decided to write my review on this service . And told you what i really get from this service.
So at first i contacted OP about plagiarized article i got on one of my web 2.0 . There was ONE WHOLE PARAGRAPH copied between two web 2.0 properties. Of course
I am not satisfied with this because there is written UNIQUE and WELL RESEARCHED CONTENT if you are not noobs guys you know that such mistake can happen only if you spin articles and post them .
If there were two totally identical articles it would be OK . Just human mistake . But one paragraph and rest of the article is unique? Something not totally honest i think....
Next think is how these web 2.0 are checked and how real quality they are . Yes they have different themes but if you look a little bit deeper you will find :
1. That your titles are broken so your inner pages looks like this
Really that quality hand work? So how something like this can happen ? Great video isnt it?
2. Have you heard about super bonus in form of About Us for every page? Well this About Us pages will be never indexed . Why? Because they are soft generated which is probably bugged. So your whole About us is only taking your web 2.0 down because even google bot think it stinks .
See yourself:
Reaction of OP - Well i should be thankful because its a BONUS !
And finally when you decide to delete these links because every person who is not in SEO game for first year knows that these are not so super web 2.0. You find out that you got messed report with bad login details and bad keywrods /anchors connected which each property.
And one more thing : these are not 10 Unique web 2.0 domains - You got two accounts on tumblr , two on webs etc... So 5-6 unique domains in total . Well he says its more powerful
We are probably ranking websites for different search engines if this is considered to be quality super web 2.0
After discussion with OP i have decided to write my review on this service . And told you what i really get from this service.
So at first i contacted OP about plagiarized article i got on one of my web 2.0 . There was ONE WHOLE PARAGRAPH copied between two web 2.0 properties. Of course
I am not satisfied with this because there is written UNIQUE and WELL RESEARCHED CONTENT if you are not noobs guys you know that such mistake can happen only if you spin articles and post them .
If there were two totally identical articles it would be OK . Just human mistake . But one paragraph and rest of the article is unique? Something not totally honest i think....
Next think is how these web 2.0 are checked and how real quality they are . Yes they have different themes but if you look a little bit deeper you will find :
1. That your titles are broken so your inner pages looks like this
Really that quality hand work? So how something like this can happen ? Great video isnt it?
2. Have you heard about super bonus in form of About Us for every page? Well this About Us pages will be never indexed . Why? Because they are soft generated which is probably bugged. So your whole About us is only taking your web 2.0 down because even google bot think it stinks .
See yourself:
Reaction of OP - Well i should be thankful because its a BONUS !
And finally when you decide to delete these links because every person who is not in SEO game for first year knows that these are not so super web 2.0. You find out that you got messed report with bad login details and bad keywrods /anchors connected which each property.
And one more thing : these are not 10 Unique web 2.0 domains - You got two accounts on tumblr , two on webs etc... So 5-6 unique domains in total . Well he says its more powerful
We are probably ranking websites for different search engines if this is considered to be quality super web 2.0
Attachments
Last edited:
This nearly done?
You are right about the whole paragraph being copied and as a consequence we have already fired the article write who made this mistake so in future nothing like this ever happens again.
You mentioned that you have checked only two web 2.0 out the 10 delivered to you. I think it will not be fair to draw a final conclusion just by checking two article. I am confident that when you check all of them you will surely change you mind.
1. About the Title of Web 2.0
I agree that the title was broken in just one web 2.0, but the issue has already been resolved and will never happen again. We
recommend you checking the remaining 9 web 2.0 to come to a final conclusion about Titles and themes and super quality.
We assure you that all the work being done by us is 100% hand made in terms of quality. Again coming to the video part, all the other web 2.0 videos posted on the 9 web 2.0 were up to the mark whereas the only the one that you checked may have missed out.
Again we assure you that these mistakes have already been rectified and will never happen again.
2. We do not include About Us in our Web 2.0, but just of the sake of you we have made About Us page which were up to the mark and all your web 2.0 properties are already indexed in search engines.
3. We did not decide to delete the links rather we fixed that specific web 2.0 link. I agree it was messed in log in detail but it has already been provided to you.
About the anchor text - there were 5 keywords, which we have split over 10 web 2.0 and all the articles were according to the instructions about the one keyword you specified for all the articles.
Yes these are not 10 unique web 2.0, but we have used 6 unique web 2.0 split in two different accounts, different user names for each web 2.0 and we have only use high PR web 2.0 which have very good indexed ratio as results can be seen. All your web 2.0 have already been indexed. Most of the competitors do not provide this but we guarantee to provide high quality super web 2.0 service to all our respected clients. This is why our indexed ratio for web 2.0 is high and most of our clients see their key words enjoy high positions in search engines.
Index ratio:
[/URL]
You can not draw a final conclusion about this service just by comparing one web 2.0 with others 9. You have not even wrote a single word about a others 9 web 2.0. They were up to the mark.
We made a mistake, and we have already resolved them. I assure you that you will not see this thing happens again.
Hey buddy, Your report was sent to your email on yesterday
You mentioned that you have checked only two web 2.0 out the 10 delivered to you. I think it will not be fair to draw a final conclusion just by checking two article. I am confident that when you check all of them you will surely change you mind.
1. About the Title of Web 2.0
I agree that the title was broken in just one web 2.0, but the issue has already been resolved and will never happen again. We
recommend you checking the remaining 9 web 2.0 to come to a final conclusion about Titles and themes and super quality.
We assure you that all the work being done by us is 100% hand made in terms of quality. Again coming to the video part, all the other web 2.0 videos posted on the 9 web 2.0 were up to the mark whereas the only the one that you checked may have missed out.
Again we assure you that these mistakes have already been rectified and will never happen again.
2. We do not include About Us in our Web 2.0, but just of the sake of you we have made About Us page which were up to the mark and all your web 2.0 properties are already indexed in search engines.
3. We did not decide to delete the links rather we fixed that specific web 2.0 link. I agree it was messed in log in detail but it has already been provided to you.
About the anchor text - there were 5 keywords, which we have split over 10 web 2.0 and all the articles were according to the instructions about the one keyword you specified for all the articles.
Yes these are not 10 unique web 2.0, but we have used 6 unique web 2.0 split in two different accounts, different user names for each web 2.0 and we have only use high PR web 2.0 which have very good indexed ratio as results can be seen. All your web 2.0 have already been indexed. Most of the competitors do not provide this but we guarantee to provide high quality super web 2.0 service to all our respected clients. This is why our indexed ratio for web 2.0 is high and most of our clients see their key words enjoy high positions in search engines.
Index ratio:
You can not draw a final conclusion about this service just by comparing one web 2.0 with others 9. You have not even wrote a single word about a others 9 web 2.0. They were up to the mark.
We made a mistake, and we have already resolved them. I assure you that you will not see this thing happens again.
Hey buddy, Your report was sent to your email on yesterday
- Status