Insane Google ranker

[yenerich]

I don't know, I am still using Serpify and I am getting pretty decent results. In the early days it was a little rough around the edges but it's been greatly improving and I have as of recent noticed some positive improvements in my ranking reports, so I'm convinced its definitely working for me. I just upgraded using their cyber monday promotion they announced about an hour ago on their sales thread. I don't think this competing solution will be able to outperform serpify by the sounds of it, but I'll check it out once it launched, why not.

Also you appear to be using some tool that monitors all incoming and outgoing HTTP traffic, that is not something the average user would do and certainly unavoidable. This data is not revealed to anyone but the local user though... Google doesn't see it.

The software does not have any tool that monitors all incoming and outgoing HTTP traffic. I don't know why you believe this.
We are just working as a real anonymous browser, without cookies, ip, useragent or any other kind of detection. Google will not detect us, that what i said.

About SERPIFY, im glad that you get decent results. Im sure our toll will also provide decent results to our users.
We are trying to go one step beyond all other software that uses similar method, not because we are trying to compite, but because we are trying to achive better results for the user.

 

[emaad]

I would love to try this product once you have it finished... good luck

 

[Jv2master99]

yea, it seems to be good, i need a try .

 

[yenerich]

Im making a lot of tests.
Here is one i started from cero, i mean a site with cero visitors.
Take a look at this Google Webmaster Tools image:

 

[datingcamtube]

im very intrested in that tool, could not post PM because not enuff posts yet PM me with info please...

 

[happywinner]

but you need to click it on google search result,and if you do not do seo good,you can not find your website link on google,and if you do seo good,this tool is not necessary,confused

 

[infoasian]

The *only* way that it does not work, is if Google detects it.

On fact is that Google counts the clicks on the serps and use that info for ranking, and they COULD NOT STOP DOING IT.
Its like backlinks, they CANT STOP count it. What they can do is try to detect if someone is creating his own backlinks.

Is the same for the clicks, they can not stop counting them. They can only try to detect if those clicks are fake or not.

At the end Google will always loose every fight because they NEED to count somethings and people are smart enought to avoid Google detection. Thats why GSA and other software still working.

I think it is pretty clear Google only trusts clicks from people who are logged into their google accounts. They simply compare clicks from google members and non-members and if there is a large difference in ratios they move results backwards, not to front.

Even when you have an army of bots that are actually logged into Google, you would still leave large footprints. Why would so many people click on the same links? Very hard to keep this under the radar, but it might be worth trying.

 

[moshe90048]

This is the log from one of the bot offered in the bst:

No matter how secure (encryption or whatnot) you make the bot, G doesn't care. If they run this bot, all the data are exposed to them and they can use this to penalize the site.

IMO i don't think these kind of programs can hurt your ranking, the only thing is not do any effect to Ranking, Google should be really bad if it can make it happen.
Imagine you get the program configure it with all your competitors sites and after few days, weeks your website is the only one left in the first page.

 

[moshe90048]

BTW is the tool out for Beta testing?

 

[yenerich]

 

[yenerich]

I think it is pretty clear Google only trusts clicks from people who are logged into their google accounts. They simply compare clicks from google members and non-members and if there is a large difference in ratios they move results backwards, not to front.

Even when you have an army of bots that are actually logged into Google, you would still leave large footprints. Why would so many people click on the same links? Very hard to keep this under the radar, but it might be worth trying.

Google trust in links from a lot of spammed sites and they dont trust in clicks from not logged people? Can i see how your sources behind this idea?

What large footprints did you leave? Forget about cookies, read any PHP maual and you will learn to dont trust in Cookies, Google dont trust in cookies because its very easy to manage them. Dol you know that the cookies are readed and writed by your browser, so its easy to stop doing it if your coding an internal browser? The IP is a Google passed proxy (we will not discuss the existence of Google passed proxies), and again your browser can lie when Google ask for the OS, screen reslution, etc.

 

[moshe90048]

Can we test it? no Beta testing?

 

[yenerich]

Can we test it? no Beta testing?

We will release a BETA testing when we are ready, for now we are still working and testing and improving everything

 

[Insidemann]

This truly is insane.

 

[mktanny]

This truly is insane.
Google tracks way more than you think...and they have a patent to detect proxies through latency.
that plus the CTR manipulation patent detects any Ctr above the threshold for its position and page.

there are some ways to get around these but I'm sure you haven't read a single Google patent. If you did you wouldn't even start with thinking about using proxies.

good luck Jnr... If you want to speak to a seasoned Google professional give us a pm.

Every lock has a key , whether it exists or not is a matter of finding out ..

 

[Insidemann]

I agree... But proxies are not keys..they are footprints that Google has servers detecting. Hope your software works around it.

 

[mktanny]

I agree... But proxies are not keys..they are footprints that Google has servers detecting.
i know how to get around them.. You could call me a master locksmith... This program is more like a policeman trying to knock the door down.

no stealth... U may as well say here I am lol

i thought this was blackhatworld forum and people were actually pros here.

Part of being a pro is not disclosing everything .

Also , you have not been here for a long , stay and you will know , pros or not ..most of us are like minded people . Some in the making , some their and improving

 

[ProSeo]

just trying to help with what I know....maybe I should keep to myself and let this guy sell this bot as is....just trying to stop people from dreaming and make something that actually works

 

[yenerich]

Google does not detects proxies in an efficient way. Thats why software like GSA, Scrapebox, SeNuke, etc are VERY usefull and successfull. There is a way to bypass Google.

As i said before, i dont want this thread to become a war of opinions. Im talking about some specific piece of software that im developing and im seeing excelent results.

Some people may be interested on the idea and some not. But this is not a place to discuss in deep about Google, please.

This thread is to talk about this software that im developing and give and receive feedback, ideas, etc. We will not disclose here how we bypass Google's detections, but we do it sucesfully accoring to our tests.
We are very close to have the first BETA ready, give me 8 or 10 days to get there.

 

[veboo]

It seems to be an effective software