Yes that will be just another one of his many lies.
Charles Floate charged with hacking and possession of child sex images
- Thread starter boombaby7
- Start date
- Status
Yes that will be just another one of his many lies.
I will leave it at this, as you really are beginning to bore the fuck out of me now. This thread is about Charlie, and you are banging on about the UK courts being corrupt, therefore you are defending Charlie. I think you have got to the point where you have not even got a clue what you are on about.
Just one of your quotes which defends him.
- Jun 10, 2011
- 2,270
- 1,995
In all honesty, the little cunt should be sent down for having that filth on his laptop. I don't give a shit about his human rights or how much it'll hurt him if he goes to jail; if he has child porn on his HD, then the only punishment should be jail. Hell, I'm fed up that every time I fire in a dvd that I get that FACT message saying that you can get up to 10 years for downloading a movie.
Now, which is the real crime here? A film being ripped off from a movie studio or seeing deprave images of a child being abused? Someone had posted earlier here that it's not that bad because it's only pixels. However these kids have been actively abused to obtained the pixels in the photo. It's disgusting and we shouldn't be letting shit like this stand. Throw him in with the lifers and let them deal with him; his kind is disgusting and can't be cured.
Now, which is the real crime here? A film being ripped off from a movie studio or seeing deprave images of a child being abused? Someone had posted earlier here that it's not that bad because it's only pixels. However these kids have been actively abused to obtained the pixels in the photo. It's disgusting and we shouldn't be letting shit like this stand. Throw him in with the lifers and let them deal with him; his kind is disgusting and can't be cured.
stharthjw6j
BANNED
- Dec 23, 2013
- 584
- 251
Remember when I accused you of committing a straw man on multiple occasions? Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man#Structure the above quote is.
As for your attempt to quote me defending him...
"I guess what's really prickling at me is that if he's locked up people here will probably believe the court's verdict wholesale...then gossip about it some more."
...Ironically even the courts I've been attacking wouldn't have accepted that as me saying he's innocent! That was an observation of the people in this thread, not a claim of Charlie's innocence, see how that works?
Given everything else I quoted you which you conveniently glossed over, I think I'll accept that as an admission your claim was presumptuous.
I sometimes wonder if I'm writing clearly or if people's radars just aren't getting what I'm saying. Even W130SN misunderstood what I was saying about which judges decide who is guilty or innocent, or about Charlie's guilt or innocence, and he's pretty much the only one here who has given a reasonable reply.
For someone who's been bored the fuck out of, you sure are getting pointy about this.
Last edited:
Money Over Morals
BANNED
- Aug 10, 2014
- 61
- 85
Why would you ignore the rest of my post and comment on this tiny, insignificant point?
Money Over Morals
BANNED
- Aug 10, 2014
- 61
- 85
Read these, parts are amusing. He is such a script kiddie, he was desperate to be part of Anonymous but was too much of a clown to keep his mouth shut.
TehWongZ = Charlton Floate
http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-anonymous-leaks-fbi-phone-call-discussing-hacking-investigations-20120203-story.html
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/02/pokes/
http://letsbytecode.com/security/a-hacker-under-the-alias-tehwongz-was-rebuked-for-hypocrisy/
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/anonymous-hackers-fbi-friday-release-conference-call-292493
http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203711104577200872061278502
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2399817,00.asp
http://eduncovered.com/y-u-mad-anonymous-piss-off-the-fbi-2012-02-04
http://www.pcworld.com/article/249858/hackers_probably_stole_steam_transaction_data_valve_says.html
Such a clown lol
You just gave me ammo for the next week on twitter running up to the trial - thank you.
@godofseo
It is pretty obvious, and you should know the answer to that? You posted your opinion on my posts, that is fine, you're perfectly entitled to your opinion. Why would I comment on your opinion? But you then posted something completely outside of your opinion - you made a claim about me that is simply untrue. I never once, not once, defended Charles, nor wanted to see him as a speaker at the upcoming conference. I never once said that, you cannot find a quote from me saying that at all.
If you mean THIS:
Then please read it again, because you misunderstood what I was saying.I don't think this is fair at all? Lets say that Charles is found guilty (which he HASN'T been). It isn't like the charges he will be found guilty on have anything to do with the SEO and marketing techniques he has been teaching, so why would Matthew's credibility be effected by this? I think we should stick to the marketing techniques here
I was saying that the chow charges that Charles has been accused of (which we also knew very little of at the time) had no impact on Matthew's reputation. I said that we should be judging and talking about marketing techniques being taught by others to judge their credibility of their tutorials/courses/guides, not whether they have friends who have chow charges. If you still find Matthew wanting on marketing techniques he supports, that is entirely your business.
Seriously, I barely know you from your old times on BHW, I don't know why you would want to drag my name through mud with false accusations?
Money Over Morals
BANNED
- Aug 10, 2014
- 61
- 85
I would not be surprised if Matthew had a part in the child porn. Never trust ginger people
D
Deleted member 708208
Guest
Hell of an accusation to make about another member. This is a public board in the top 500
on Alexa. So I really think its important not to say stuff like that even if you're just trolling.
BreaknBrix
Power Member
- Mar 25, 2014
- 778
- 4,523
I would not be surprised if a sloth had more brain cells than you do.
beaglejuice
Power Member
- Mar 12, 2009
- 744
- 487
antichrist
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 1,954
- 2,632
TIL that people with red hair is a race.
stharthjw6j
BANNED
- Dec 23, 2013
- 584
- 251
To the people getting butthurt because I'm questioning the court system this Charlie guy is facing; it takes two to tango, or in your case, half a dozen. Telling me not to talk about it while responding to me in depth is pretty short.
Let's cut to the chase here, this thread turned into a triumphant celebration about somebody you all dislike going down, and me questioning the legitimacy of the system that might send him down is spoiling the party for you. Even Spiderblast/BreaknBrix explicitly said so in his whining post. Well sorry folks, if you thought you were going to celebrate this while inherently validating the bent franchise that deals with him - akin to watching Charles Manson be executed by Fidel Castro then popping your champagne corks - it was only a matter of time til somebody spoke up and spoiled your little party. Bottom line is this is a hollow victory. Don't shoot the messenger...
Now unless anyone wants any more, or wants to suggest I'm defending Charlie's innocence (watch your steps), then I'm done.
Let's cut to the chase here, this thread turned into a triumphant celebration about somebody you all dislike going down, and me questioning the legitimacy of the system that might send him down is spoiling the party for you. Even Spiderblast/BreaknBrix explicitly said so in his whining post. Well sorry folks, if you thought you were going to celebrate this while inherently validating the bent franchise that deals with him - akin to watching Charles Manson be executed by Fidel Castro then popping your champagne corks - it was only a matter of time til somebody spoke up and spoiled your little party. Bottom line is this is a hollow victory. Don't shoot the messenger...
Now unless anyone wants any more, or wants to suggest I'm defending Charlie's innocence (watch your steps), then I'm done.
Money Over Morals
BANNED
- Aug 10, 2014
- 61
- 85
Oh my god guys lighten.
Matthew does not have as soul so its OK. He wont even feel bad about what I said.
No harm no foul.
Matthew does not have as soul so its OK. He wont even feel bad about what I said.
No harm no foul.
Money Over Morals
BANNED
- Aug 10, 2014
- 61
- 85
Money Over Morals
BANNED
- Aug 10, 2014
- 61
- 85
Charles,
Good luck in your trial tomorrow mate
you fucking rapist
Good luck in your trial tomorrow mate
you fucking rapist
- Mar 4, 2014
- 108
- 76
I mean.. Isn't he like 18? Didn't you guys get pitures of girls from the grade below you in high school?
All fun and games when you are 17, you turn 18 and its now federal crime.
P.S. didn't read OP or story or replies so I have no idea if it was innocent boobage with a snatch shot thrown in or if it was creeper material. If creeper material, hang em'.
All fun and games when you are 17, you turn 18 and its now federal crime.
P.S. didn't read OP or story or replies so I have no idea if it was innocent boobage with a snatch shot thrown in or if it was creeper material. If creeper material, hang em'.
- Status