Charles Floate charged with hacking and possession of child sex images

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why is this 19 year old so important?

I mean I guess I could actually just search him up instead of asking.
 
I think someone may have been upset by the courts at sometime in his life.

In fact I said so on around page 4. However, my points are standing up whether written by myself or by the PM of Britain. I'm suspecting a third logical fallacy coming about how therefore the points written have somehow less validity. If so, I'll throw some more dissonant discourse your way, but tomorrow.

It's bed time.
 
Now I see, and your experience of the UK court system defines the whole system in every area / county / town and city in the UK.
 
Can't give a normal answer, just use a shite response. Typical. I think you need to go cry to the courts, tell them how unfair they was to you, not sit here defending a nonce because you was "badly done to".
What is shite about calling out your (repeated) logical fallacies? I write out carefully considered explanations about the shortcomings of the British Courts and their culture, and you keep returning with either single line straw man, or some ad hominem of undermining the post by attacking the poster. It was getting tiresome discussing with someone like that, at least W130SN and sturose could hold a decent discourse. You don't seem aware of what makes a shite post, when. You may enjoy watching this person you hate so much go down, but it would be a rather hollow win, because the franchise that would send him down has serious issues with their legitimacy, which you haven't particularly addressed with any decent depth.
 
Seriously, England is fucked up. If you are a tax-paying citizen and have a pictures of naked children on your computer, you go to jail. If you are on benefits and you actually molest numerous children, but you have a beard and you are an immigrant, you don't even get sentenced.

All Charles would have to do, is to grow a beard and he would be fine.

England is fucked up completely. I had an idea about moving to London some day, but I don't any more.
 
What is shite about calling out your (repeated) logical fallacies? I write out carefully considered explanations about the shortcomings of the British Courts and their culture, and you keep returning with either single line straw man, or some ad hominem of undermining the post by attacking the poster. It was getting tiresome discussing with someone like that, at least W130SN and sturose could hold a decent discourse. You don't seem aware of what makes a shite post, when. You may enjoy watching this person you hate so much go down, but it would be a rather hollow win, because the franchise that would send him down has serious issues with their legitimacy, which you haven't particularly addressed with any decent depth.

Encase you haven't noticed, the topic of this thread isn't "British Courts and their culture". I'm pretty sure most people don't give a fuck. All courts are fucked up in 1 way or another & if you wanna make a separate thread about it, go for it. If not.... please shut up. The kid hacked a site and filmed himself doing it..... on top of that he does all this while having a phone and computer infested with child porn.

The kid is a scammer, a fake, a fraud, a bullshit artist, a pedophile & one of the dumbest "hackers" alive. He annoyed the shit out of this forum and now everyone is venting how happy they are.

My question to you is.... why try to ruin that? Why go off ranting about the "culture" of British Courts? IF he had broken some controversial laws... then it would be justified. But child porn & hacking? He hasn't even been sentenced yet somehow, in the muddied depths of your mind, your brain skips all that shit and goes straight to corruption and how fucked up British Courts are? That's quite the leap to take.

Seriously, England is fucked up. If you are a tax-paying citizen and have a pictures of naked children on your computer, you go to jail. If you are on benefits and you actually molest numerous children, but you have a beard and you are an immigrant, you don't even get sentenced.

Source please.
 
Encase you haven't noticed, the topic of this thread isn't "British Courts and their culture". I'm pretty sure most people don't give a fuck. All courts are fucked up in 1 way or another & if you wanna make a separate thread about it, go for it. If not.... please shut up. The kid hacked a site and filmed himself doing it..... on top of that he does all this while having a phone and computer infested with child porn.

The kid is a scammer, a fake, a fraud, a bullshit artist, a pedophile & one of the dumbest "hackers" alive. He annoyed the shit out of this forum and now everyone is venting how happy they are.

My question to you is.... why try to ruin that? Why go off ranting about the "culture" of British Courts? IF he had broken some controversial laws... then it would be justified. But child porn & hacking? He hasn't even been sentenced yet somehow, in the muddied depths of your mind, your brain skips all that shit and goes straight to corruption and how fucked up British Courts are? That's quite the leap to take.
A discussion will naturally evolve as the elements of a topic are picked out, somebody at the centre of the thread is about to be put through a judicial system of dubious legitimacy, so I put forward my own takes regarding it. To do that, I do not require your warrant, sanction, approval, endorsement or commission. I wouldn't accept it even if you offered it. Oh no, Spiderblast told me to shut up, I'd better do it then.
 
(and you wanted him to speak at untagged.. You don't even know what country is from.
Ignoring the rest of your post, I would just like to say that I never said I wanted him to speak at 'Untagged' (or Ungagged). Nor do I like Charles. I'm pretty sure that no one on this forum likes Charles.
 
Encase you haven't noticed, the topic of this thread isn't "British Courts and their culture". I'm pretty sure most people don't give a fuck. All courts are fucked up in 1 way or another & if you wanna make a separate thread about it, go for it. If not.... please shut up. The kid hacked a site and filmed himself doing it..... on top of that he does all this while having a phone and computer infested with child porn.

The kid is a scammer, a fake, a fraud, a bullshit artist, a pedophile & one of the dumbest "hackers" alive. He annoyed the shit out of this forum and now everyone is venting how happy they are.

My question to you is.... why try to ruin that? Why go off ranting about the "culture" of British Courts? IF he had broken some controversial laws... then it would be justified. But child porn & hacking? He hasn't even been sentenced yet somehow, in the muddied depths of your mind, your brain skips all that shit and goes straight to corruption and how fucked up British Courts are? That's quite the leap to take.



Source please.

Agree with you dude. I think this thread is gonna go the wrong way otherwise.
Stick to topic.
Courts are courts, they are fucked up, but its the way it works - its never going to be 100% right, but its made to be as fair and impartial as possible.
 
What is shite about calling out your (repeated) logical fallacies? I write out carefully considered explanations about the shortcomings of the British Courts and their culture, and you keep returning with either single line straw man, or some ad hominem of undermining the post by attacking the poster. It was getting tiresome discussing with someone like that, at least W130SN and sturose could hold a decent discourse. You don't seem aware of what makes a shite post, when. You may enjoy watching this person you hate so much go down, but it would be a rather hollow win, because the franchise that would send him down has serious issues with their legitimacy, which you haven't particularly addressed with any decent depth.

You seem to think you sound quite the part, however you simply sound like a tool. Your problem is simply with the courts, and due to your problem with the courts, you are suggesting that Charlie has been wronged, even though the clown has made a video of him (yes him, a video that he made, not the police, not the courts, but "Charlie Floate) hacking the governments website. He then had his laptops seized and child pornography was found on them. However like a clown, you are insisting that Charlie has been badly done to, even though there is evidence, evidence strong enough to remand him in custody, to suggest otherwise.

Go on bang away with yet more mindless drivel, it is highly amusing watching you make a fool of yourself.

How could I possibly hate Charlie so much? I don't even know him, I quite simply dislike him.
 
I've never heard of this kid before this thread. So I did a little research, saw some videos. He doesn't seem as arrogant as some of you claim. I watched a vid where he was saying who came up with the name theseogod, and how it stuck.

Why does everyone hate him so much? Is it jealousy? Or has he personally scammed you?

Seems like people who never had anything to do with this kid are jumping on the bandwagon to get the pitchforks
 
I've never heard of this kid before this thread. So I did a little research, saw some videos. He doesn't seem as arrogant as some of you claim. I watched a vid where he was saying who came up with the name theseogod, and how it stuck.

Why does everyone hate him so much? Is it jealousy? Or has he personally scammed you?

Seems like people jumping on the bandwagon to get the pitchforks


You didnt see the thread where he posted a fake id?
 
You seem to think you sound quite the part, however you simply sound like a tool. Your problem is simply with the courts, and due to your problem with the courts, you are suggesting that Charlie has been wronged, even though the clown has made a video of him (yes him, a video that he made, not the police, not the courts, but "Charlie Floate) hacking the governments website. He then had his laptops seized and child pornography was found on them. However like a clown, you are insisting that Charlie has been badly done to, even though there is evidence, evidence strong enough to remand him in custody, to suggest otherwise.

Go on bang away with yet more mindless drivel, it is highly amusing watching you make a fool of yourself.

How could I possibly hate Charlie so much? I don't even know him, I quite simply dislike him.
You thinking I sound like a tool is none of my business.

However I look forward to you providing quotes of me defending this Charlie person, or "defending this nonce", as you put it, given these quotes are in direct contradict to your accusation:
"I'm not really speaking about this Charles guy individually, but about the court franchise as a whole"

"I am interested, just not about this man,"

"I don't know this guy, don't know what he looks like and don't think I've spoken to him on the forum,"

"it doesn't mean he's guilty or innocent of course"

"By the way, I'm not defending or accusing this guy, he's not my concern,".


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top