Web 2.0's!

[Spuffed]

I'm finally starting my first Web 2.0 and i'm using Scrapebox to get me some decent articles and then using Wicked Article Creator to spin those articles to create me some content.

Are there any precautions I need to take? Do IP's matter?
So just say my main sites niche is "laptops" and then I create my first Web 2.0 which would be eg. "GeneralLaptopInfo", I've read that you need around 3 posts per Web 2.0 to be on the safer side, what would be the best way to go about this? I was thinking:
Post 1 - General information on Laptops which I would put a couple links to my main site
Post 2 - Which laptops are the best, which I would link to just say an article on my main site eg. "Best laptops 2014"
Post 3 - The future of laptops which I could then post to another article which would also be on "the future of laptops" for example.

Have I got the main gist of it or what am I missing?

As for safety precautions, do I need to use proxies? different emails per web 2.0? How many web 2.0's am I allowed on the same Platform?

I would love some help if i'm missing anything.

 

[lilmasta]

i wont use same platform more then once

 

[liberox]

Hope you`re not using scraped content for making links to your main site. What are You doing is well as Tier2, just don`t put a link for the same site in all 3 artciles (per blog), mix with links to authoity sites (from that topic) too.

 

[DannyZhang]

I wouldn't use Wicked Article Creator and spun articles on your web 2.0 properties. These web 2.0s are going to link to your site eventually. Don't use spun content if you can help it.

 

[Spuffed]

The content created is actually half decent to be honest! Because i'm using Scrapebox to grab keyword specific articles and then WAC is spinning it, but if it's that bad I won't do it.

What i've done on my first one is:
- Spun an article
- Fixed mistakes
- Added an image and video
- Diversified the links, linking anchor text to both my site AND other sites

Is this completely wrong?

I'll watch more of the Matthew Woodward tutorial.

 

[hpasha]

scraped content and rewriting do no work anymore but still best of luck

 

[Spuffed]

scraped content and rewriting do no work anymore but still best of luck

Hmm okay, so would I be better either researching + writing myself and/or outsourcing the content?

 

[marycarlos]

Best of luck mate for your web 2.0s

 

[SpookSEO]

scraped content and rewriting do no work anymore but still best of luck

This is part true and untrue. Depending on your skills, if you do the rewriting the right way, there is not a chance you will get penalized for this.

Writing it yourself would be better especially if this is your first project. It'll be higher quality/unique, free and a good practice for later on. Rewriting and spinning content is usually done if one is working on a bigger scale.

 

[davids355]

Its ok what you are doing, but as said above, you dont really want that content linking directly to your money site.
You need some high quality properties in between.

 

[Spuffed]

This is part true and untrue. Depending on your skills, if you do the rewriting the right way, there is not a chance you will get penalized for this.

Writing it yourself would be better especially if this is your first project. It'll be higher quality/unique, free and a good practice for later on. Rewriting and spinning content is usually done if one is working on a bigger scale.

Hmm, so I should just do it myself a bit, just to get a better understanding and the experience for future projects.

I'll see what I can do!

Its ok what you are doing, but as said above, you dont really want that content linking directly to your money site.
You need some high quality properties in between.

I thought Money site<Web 2.0<Blog comments etc<Spam?
So I thought my web 2.0's were supposed to directly link? Well I mean, technically i'm not directly linking them if i'm writing articles and then using anchor text which links to my money site from my web 2.0? Is this not correct?

 

[ningning]

Hmm, so I should just do it myself a bit, just to get a better understanding and the experience for future projects.

I'll see what I can do!

I thought Money site<Web 2.0<Blog comments etc<Spam?
So I thought my web 2.0's were supposed to directly link? Well I mean, technically i'm not directly linking them if i'm writing articles and then using anchor text which links to my money site from my web 2.0? Is this not correct?

What davids355 is saying is that you should not use crappy content for the posts that link your money site. Your scheme is fine, but the success will depend on the quality of your web 2.0s and the quality an uniqueness of the content you post.

Here is a checklist that will increase the stick rate a lot:

• Open the welcome message (if there is one)
• Fill in the profile with most details (even if you don't get a link from the profile page)
• Upload an avatar.
• Post content that can pass a human review. It should be 100% readable without the very clear mark of spun content.
• Post content that can pass automated plagiarism check.
• Don't flood the article with links (I never post more than one).
• Have an image or video that actually fits the topic and is not violating any copy rights.
• Ask your self: "Does this site look like a crap site created really fast only with SEO and marketing in mind?". If the answer is yes the risk of the site being removed i greatly increased.

If you follow the advice above you should see good results.