Why big sites are never punished

[misteryou.]

Why big sites never got slaped by google ?

If you take exemple of big sites news like yahoo news,huffin ect they just copy paste articles between each other
if you take wordpress as exemple, they have tons of backlinks coming mainly from footer theme, is it the correct google guidelines? lol
i remember long ago reading a blog post about expedia too and some black hat seo used


why? i know google is zionnist and zionnists love money so my conclusion is i guess its because of money lol those big sites are feeding google

what you think

 

[HappyS]

I think lot of valuable content makes up for the things you mentioned.

 

[FBGuru]

That's the power of authority. It's much easier to pick a sprout than to pull a giant tree.

 

[KamBhai]

It's all Google's wish.
Now they are happy they keep them.
Tomorrow they will be mad and ban them

 

[lord1027]

That's the power of authority. It's much easier to pick a sprout than to pull a giant tree.

Best explanation so far
Pretty much, all algorithm updates favor Authority Websites, so small websites chances of ranking are lower.

 

[kyoka12]

Why big sites never got slaped by google ?

If you take exemple of big sites news like yahoo news,huffin ect they just copy paste articles between each other
if you take wordpress as exemple, they have tons of backlinks coming mainly from footer theme, is it the correct google guidelines? lol
i remember long ago reading a blog post about expedia too and some black hat seo used


why? i know google is zionnist and zionnists love money so my conclusion is i guess its because of money lol those big sites are feeding google

what you think

because the big sites like yahoo news, huffin has become a brand sites, google love brand sites thats why

 

[macdonjo3]

Because those sites offer value to the users and you 500 word, keyword-stuffed, $2.50 articles don't.

 

[ThopHayt]

I think it may be traffic and size related. The rules are different if a site has 250,000 pages and 10,000,000 visitors a day. It's inertia really. The reason for setting the rules like this well may be money, but it is how the rules are.

 

[GreyKnight]

Because most of article, though valuable, are most of times re-hashed articles from the Internet, which gives no new insights, no new events, and nothing new at all. Yes, your "cancer" article may details on what cancer is, and what is the treatment, but will never be the "first" thing such as collating cancer information from year to year, or talking about the last month treatment on cancer.

The solution is not to face the giant head-on, but be smart and try another way. There are zillions of way.

 

[Slashdot]

Big sites get punished too. Why do you think Yahoo Voices was cancelled?

 

[IceHD]

prweb.com anyone ?

 

[fabrianne]

Remember when Google penalised Microsoft because of many ads showing in internet explorer. Thus, Google punished big sites too though very rare to happen.

 

[bizroot]

Google avoid punishing big brands because Google needs them more then they need Google... It's not always quality and they also post duplicate content, they also get bulk backlinks basically they do every thing which will kill you if you try...

It's just that they got authority in their niche and people know it... Google always prefer brands/authority sites so basically they are update proof...

They will not get slapped unless they start dancing naked lol like Forbes.com started selling links and got penalized...

https://productforums.google.com/fo...asters/crawling-indexing--ranking/TkYkXal4CLM

Google is not doing it for searchers, they doing it for their own personal gain... May be one day they will loose monopoly then you will see Google will start listening to other people also but until then play along the lines...

 

[LleixG]

Because they are making big money

 

[hopsie2]

I 'd say dont compare your site to those!

 

[Wilson Grant Fisk]

Why big sites never got slaped by google ?

If you take exemple of big sites news like yahoo news,huffin ect they just copy paste articles between each other
if you take wordpress as exemple, they have tons of backlinks coming mainly from footer theme, is it the correct google guidelines? lol
i remember long ago reading a blog post about expedia too and some black hat seo used


why? i know google is zionnist and zionnists love money so my conclusion is i guess its because of money lol those big sites are feeding google

what you think

You are a clown.

 

[SkyrocketSEO]

If you take exemple of big sites news like yahoo news,huffin ect they just copy paste articles between each other

That's called article syndication OP

 

[seosky]

Because they have Quality..Team of Experts. No Jokes..Real Stuff. and Giving 100% to Users.

 

[misteryou.]

Because those sites offer value to the users and you 500 word, keyword-stuffed, $2.50 articles don't.

because you use broken articles with poor grammar doesn't mean everybody is doing the same , got it?

 

[misteryou.]

You are a clown.

thanks i am trying to be like you

just a little hard