how they did it? (fake PR?)
- Thread starter Damat
- Start date
sorry, wrong...!
the last PR update was in 07 DEC2013, right?
http://web.archive.org/web/20130701000000*/http://uryani.com/
in 20.12.2013 the site looks same. no 301.
any thoughts?
the last PR update was in 07 DEC2013, right?
http://web.archive.org/web/20130701000000*/http://uryani.com/
in 20.12.2013 the site looks same. no 301.
any thoughts?
arganrecords
Elite Member
- Oct 12, 2013
- 1,678
- 2,114
How you can say that? Wayback machine gives you this kind of information?
FutureProofSeo
Senior Member
- Jul 3, 2013
- 956
- 484
The site looking the same, and the site having a 301 aren't mutually exclusive you know.
Backlink profile has no relation to the appearance of the site!
Backlink profile has no relation to the appearance of the site!
pxoxrxn
Supreme Member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 1,398
- 2,084
Whatever you say. Good luck finding a different answer.
Gyuman82
Elite Member
- Nov 15, 2011
- 1,866
- 1,146
Lots and lots of quality contents!!!
Oh and a 301 redirect somewhere along the way.
And YES that is how it's done, your reference to Archive.org is meaningless.
intruder2600
Junior Member
- Jul 30, 2010
- 160
- 68
IP cloaking maybe 
IP cloaking maybe
we can see it ?
intruder2600
Junior Member
- Jul 30, 2010
- 160
- 68
You should try to look at domain as google does - there are some tools online. Google is seeing 301 redirect, normal user is seeing normal website.
- Sep 22, 2013
- 1,209
- 1,670
I've so many thoughts and my first thought is you being a douche for ignoring pxoxrxn's reply because thats how you get a fake PR. Obviously you won't be able to see the results until the next PR update.
myinternetempire
Senior Member
- Oct 24, 2011
- 875
- 176
I think it is 301 redirect. What do you think?