Bill Gates
Registered Member
- Jan 5, 2009
- 99
- 471
Spot on and about time too!
Cheers for taking action.
Cheers for taking action.
Same thing could be said about the BST. Same caveats still apply. There have been quite a few cases where reputable merchants have decided, for whatever reason, to wake up in the morning and scam.Ok having digested this thread for a while, I can see one potential problem occuring. Let's say for example a noob buys some expensive "clean" coaching and actually does get ripped off. He then (being a noob) thinks that BHW and whoever personally cleared the coaching as clean should be held partly responsible for his losses. That could cause a bit of a problem all round and if it's not handled effectively at that point, in the future whoever reviews the coaching might place stricter measures in place to minimise the risk rather than be held responsible (rightly or wrongly) again.
Same thing could be said about the BST. Same caveats still apply. There have been quite a few cases where reputable merchants have decided, for whatever reason, to wake up in the morning and scam.
The hardest part about reviewing or assessing the value of ANY product is that value is so very subjective. To me, reading a guide on how to use Web 2.0 properties to increase rankings isn't worth a dime, but to someone who is new to the game, it could be that piece of information that opens their eyes to the bigger picture.
All that I ask is that when you submit your coaching review requests to staff, that you supply a lot of information and not just, "This is what I'm going to do in a single sentence." We need more meat than that.
Egads, man! Have some faith in yourself!No need for me to apply, havok already said my shitty methods wouldnt get approved
One quick way of filtering out coaches could be to ask for video proof of them earning $,$$$ a day at least. It could be a higher figure or whatever the admins deem fit but the point is that the would-be coach should be making SUBSTANTIALLY more than the average internet marketer.
I agree with and appreciate this initiative that the mods and admins here have taken.
My only suggestion would be that not just the content of the coaching be taken into account but also the history of the coach. One quick way of filtering out coaches could be to ask for video proof of them earning $,$$$ a day at least. It could be a higher figure or whatever the admins deem fit but the point is that the would-be coach should be making SUBSTANTIALLY more than the average internet marketer.
It shouldn't matter if the coaching is free or paid for. If you aren't making the big money, the only person you should be coaching is yourself.
Hi all, just out of curiosity is there any coaches right now?
Have any been accepted as coaches.
I must admit ive not seen any in peoples sigs since this thread started
Si