Scrapebox - Low results for Google?

[loopline]

From where did you get the V2? My scrapebox is already updated and just see V1.

Its not released yet. SweetFunny is the developer, hence why they have it already.

 

[Sephirot_90]

When will the 2.0 version be available? Will it be a free upgrade?

 

[lovethepeople]

V2 is a great idea, I think a tweak in the way proxies are used in scrapebox was long overdue.

 

[loopline]

When will the 2.0 version be available? Will it be a free upgrade?

No idea when. Last I knew they had written over 740K lines of code, rebuilding it completely from scratch. As for price, yes it is a free upgrade.

 

[mikey29]

The new harvester in ScrapeBox v2 is a lot better, here's bing for example:

That's over 100,000 urls per minute at only 150 connections, using free internal ScrapeBox proxies which i didn't even have to test first. But you will still be able to harvest with keyword stats, do retries etc like you want.

Alot of people want to do "finesse" scraping and gather say the top 10 business urls for specific keywords and care about accuracy and metrics, others just want to tear down 100 million urls as fast as possible. Well the new harvester will have 2 modes and accommodate both, also with a native 64 Bit version so memory is no issue.

how many ram, etc used to achieve that

 

[Aty]

how many ram, etc used to achieve that

He said memory is no issue. I would say 4 gigs on Windows 7 are enough.

 

[mikey29]

my bad those were the last words of what he said

 

[jhonalex768]

scrap-box will not work hard on Google you should try to posting with your self manually work is good its will work on Google.