Which article creator is best for GSA SER?

[Rank 360]

MY vote is always for the wicked Article creator. which makes my work more easy and I am comfortable with this tool.

 

[Execute]

I'm a big fan of Kontent Machine, just because of the quantity of content that it can spit out with just a few clicks. Maybe not the best but happy with it for my tiers.

 

[tixpf]

So True .. I am also still into TBS
For me its always good and don't know when I will stop loving it
OP if you have some time then go with hand spun with TBS it rocks !!

Does WAC use its own built-in spinning software? I thought it worked similar to KM3 & Co. where you simply put in your 3rd party spinner's API key.
Is the built-in spinner any good?

 

[smartie19889]

WAC is what i'm thinking of getting. Just need to make a decision. Too much choice. :detective

 

[titatovenaar]

which one is the best for adult content?

 

[Scritty]

Kontent Machine 3. One off fee, and updated so often

KM 3 has a specific adult filter on/off. If you turn it on. Expect a deluge of adult. If you turn it off... zero.

Just yesterday they added cloud functionality. Your campaigns available from anywhere via an API call. The hosting is (of course) free to all users, subs or one off fee.
Not a fan of WAC. It's quick to get a campaign going, but has fewer sources, and the content - while many claim it's more readable, is readable because it's not properly spun (and therefore duplicate).
Once you spin it, then KM has the edge as it seems to find far more sources and you can have a lot greater control over the output.

But it's a tool. Set it up to produce crap - and it will produce crap. That is the same for both products.

Scritty

 

[gk1gr]

+1 to wac from me!

 

[davids355]

I use kontent machine and it works pretty well - I can have a full campaign set up in GSA in about 10 minutes using that.

 

[tixpf]

Kontent Machine 3. One off fee, and updated so often

KM 3 has a specific adult filter on/off. If you turn it on. Expect a deluge of adult. If you turn it off... zero.

Just yesterday they added cloud functionality. Your campaigns available from anywhere via an API call. The hosting is (of course) free to all users, subs or one off fee.
Not a fan of WAC. It's quick to get a campaign going, but has fewer sources, and the content - while many claim it's more readable, is readable because it's not properly spun (and therefore duplicate).
Once you spin it, then KM has the edge as it seems to find far more sources and you can have a lot greater control over the output.

But it's a tool. Set it up to produce crap - and it will produce crap. That is the same for both products.

Scritty

I really like your posts Scritty. Always plenty of detailed information.
For the ones among us who are just getting started (and therefore have smaller campaigns, smaller needs and a much tighter budget) would you consider WAC a decent tool to meet most our article needs? The thing is, if I had the money available I'd just go with KM3 and probably never look back. However, this is not the case and therefore I'll have to compromise (even quality wise).
So, what's your opinion on this?