Tool that will generate "unique" CONTENT/text?

[crazyJon]

Hey guys,

I was looking for this for a while, but with no success. Maybe you will be able to help me.

I need some piece of software that will somehow create unique content for me. Something like, I enter KW and it will generate one nice unique article. Is there even something like this?


I remember some similar tool, but i do not remember the name :/

But what I need is really unique, Google-proof content and I am kind a worry that is not possible, is it?


Thanks guys for you help!

 

[Reyone]

Kontent machine is probably the closest tool to your description.

Anyways, I would recommend using your brain and writing skills or hiring writers. Of course, unless you are doing BH.

 

[moeatwa]

The only "tool" that will do what you're asking for with any degree of accuracy is a human being. Everything else will just be a pale imitation of that that will still need working on (again, by a human being) for it to be passable.

 

[crazyJon]

Yep, I was thinking something like this , too. Thanks guys. I have currently 3 writers sitting in my office, writing the content for clients 6 days a week. So I though it would be possible to take some work off from their shoulders (just some not important texts, etc.). But I think I will just need to hire more employees to work for me :/

Anyway, really thank you for your advice!

 

[The SEO]

You need more article writer as per your description, but for BH techs you should go with Kontent Machine.

 

[crazyJon]

Do you have any experiences with it? What is the unique rate or how does treat the texts Google? Are the texts from it really read-able?

I know I should look the thread (what I did) but I dont believe the reviews there. All the free reviews are always little bit different than the reality.

 

[Reyone]

Dude, so you got a team of writers sitting in your office (which probably costs you quite a lot of money if you are in a first world country) and you are talking about a tool to generate content? Doesn't make sense man... hire more writers.

In any case, your only option would be to hire a proper coder and programmer and design an incredible tool that meets your requirements. The tools that are publicly available are just shit, so do not even think about using it as "quality content" because it will be shit content, readable but SHIT. I guess it comes down to your decision on whether or not you want to provide quality to your "clients".

 

[JasonS]

Scrape content as per your niche with IAW (Instant Article Wizard) and then spin it with WordAi to make it unique.

 

[crazyJon]

Scrape content as per your niche with IAW (Instant Article Wizard) and then spin it with WordAi to make it unique.

The quality will be not what I am looking for, if I just copy some article from net and then spin it automatically :/

 

[crazyJon]

Dude, so you got a team of writers sitting in your office (which probably costs you quite a lot of money if you are in a first world country) and you are talking about a tool to generate content? Doesn't make sense man... hire more writers.

In any case, your only option would be to hire a proper coder and programmer and design an incredible tool that meets your requirements. The tools that are publicly available are just shit, so do not even think about using it as "quality content" because it will be shit content, readable but SHIT. I guess it comes down to your decision on whether or not you want to provide quality to your "clients".

The problem is the actual cost of any new writer I will need. That is why I was looking for some solution how to make at least the not-important articles for clients. But yes, probably it is better to keep the quality and cut some profit on this side.

Thanks a lot man for you opinions!

 

[weloveseo]

Go with Instant Article wizard.

 

[crazyJon]

Go with Instant Article wizard.

I checked the video, do you have any experiences with this tool?

 

[crazyJon]

Ok after whole day looking for something, I have to say something like I need really does not exist. Little bit like I expected.

So thanks guys, we can close this probably.