Was there a Youtube Update?

[kacsa1337]

There was one on 7th January.

 

[Tommy Lawrence]

Yeah Dragreyon

Lol @ Dragreyon

 

[stharthjw6j]

I'm gonna be positive about this like I was after last month's update...

The blackhat vs big dogs battle has been going on since the birth of the internet, update after update has come out, but blackhatters have always found a way around what they do. I just don't feel it inside me that bigbuddy and all the others are going to announce that the "views era" is now over. Besides, there is a huge financial incentive to be the ones that CAN provide views while others cant. It may be a new script, or it may be something completely different, but there will be a work around to YouTube seo.

Don't give up just because YouTube have landed you a right hook square on the jaw, you've been knocking them about a lot longer than they have you, they just got a lucky punch in this past month. Shake off the cobwebs and attack again, there's a hella lot of money waiting for you!

 

[the45master]

Im honestly surprised though that Youtube view adding services have even lasted this long, I thought they would of fixed loopholes like that years ago....

 

[GainRank]

Yeah Dragreyon, "He ruined his own business" or "you ruined entire big view sellers business (Including yours)" everybody knows
No man is demolished but by himself."
by Richard Bently

I din't ruin anything. I shared a posted on BHW for BHW users to use because it was already floating around publicly. For anyone saying I ruined the whole market, I'm still doing just fine. The people hit were the people using public BS to do views. I love how people are still mad about this, everyone who is mad are the people who got the script, used the script, saw it worked, then it got patched. If it weren't for me, none of you people would have ever had it in the first place.

Blaming me posting one script on all the patching... It's just the public BS that's patched, I am still doing views just fine....

 

[reoman]

Im honestly surprised though that Youtube view adding services have even lasted this long, I thought they would of fixed loopholes like that years ago....

Well keep in mind they have to count "real" views so it's tough to filter all the scripts while still accurately counting all the legit views. It's a cat and mouse game, they can delete videos, patch methods, but we will never stop.


This week they have been banning lots of videos, I have been scraping random URL's and getting random videos banned(over 800 random videos banned this week ). I think it's great that youtube removes videos without knowing if the person themselves even wanted or knew about their view count being inflated artificially.

Almost all of my competitors videos have "This video has been removed because its content violated YouTube'sTerms of Service." suckaz...

I have been thinking of starting a video removal service, though my current success rate is only about 60%. Not bad, but I need it higher if I will be charging.

 

[GainRank]

Well keep in mind they have to count "real" views so it's tough to filter all the scripts while still accurately counting all the legit views. It's a cat and mouse game, they can delete videos, patch methods, but we will never stop.


This week they have been banning lots of videos, I have been scraping random URL's and getting random videos banned(over 800 random videos banned this week ). I think it's great that youtube removes videos without knowing if the person themselves even wanted or knew about their view count being inflated artificially.

Almost all of my competitors videos have "This video has been removed because its content violated YouTube'sTerms of Service." suckaz...

I have been thinking of starting a video removal service, though my current success rate is only about 60%. Not bad, but I need it higher if I will be charging.

This is what blows my mind. This is no different than negative SEO, but as we know, G doesn't seem to care about that either. I never really thought about the whole random views to random videos thing, but maybe that's what it would take for YT to stop banning videos. I mean come on, if they don't like the views, have a filter that doesn't count it. If they then find and issue later on with the views that did count, then take the views away, deleting the video is just plain stupid imo.

 

[umerjutt00]

This is what blows my mind. This is no different than negative SEO, but as we know, G doesn't seem to care about that either. I never really thought about the whole random views to random videos thing, but maybe that's what it would take for YT to stop banning videos. I mean come on, if they don't like the views, have a filter that doesn't count it. If they then find and issue later on with the views that did count, then take the views away, deleting the video is just plain stupid imo.

lol the way YT is changing things, just like SEO, a new thing is coming... Hmm what i call it... Neg Views Service ... send crap views to a video and get it banned...

 

[red phoenix]

last update was on 7th January 2014 got patched last traffic method seems likealso in news was article about youtube stuck market crashed, stuck holders start panic from seen views been sell too dam cheap lol and youtube now really active about patching thinks up, almost weekly if not daily they do changes...

Can you tell us here the specific areas affected by the update in january 7?

 

[Hecate]

It's nothing to worry about. No doubt, someone has already beat their latest changes. If view sellers aren't up to par with it by now, give it a week.

And such pride from some of these older members... it's hilarious. The moment you think you know it all, is the moment you stop learning. Even some of the lurkers on this forum are leagues ahead of you.