GScrapper - better than scrapebox?

[CANDER]

I've scrapebox, Hrefer, Gscraper and RDDZ scraper. Yes I'm a madman scraper
They're different :
scrapebox is the SEO tools u start and can do so many things
Hrefer is "free" with Xrumer and proxy update automaticaly so leave it scrape by himsel
RDDZ is perfect for scrape very precise things and get exact results not like sometimes google related pages
Gscraper is so fast with their expensive proxy service.

So depend on what you want and ready to pay for.

I use the 4 tools for differents tasks

 

[proxygo]

s/box is the swiss army knife seo tool with tons of free features
and payed addons

gscraper is a hellfire scraper that burns through proxies like fire in
a corn field

1 tool scrapes nice n easy and isnt to proxy agressive
the other eats them alive

 

[SEOShine]

I would go with Scrapebox as it has a lot of plugins, stable and can perform nearly every back link creating task you wish.

And ones who say ScrapeBox doing the job slow - you are doing it wrong. Buy solid private proxies.

 

[iglow]

overpriced vs sbox imo.

 

[CANDER]

With Gscraper, when the scrape is finished, I?d like to get list by language.

How can I do it ?

Regards

 

[HostKnight]

GScraper is amazing while their free proxies last. You can harvest up to 100,000 links per minute which is insane!

 

[iglow]

overpiced for just a scraper imo. even if its best one.

PS> im suing hrefer not SB.

 

[proxygo]

overpiced for just a scraper imo. even if its best one.
PS> im suing hrefer not SB.

agreed fastest doesnt mean the best

 

[bartosimpsonio]

Only issue I have with scrapebox is the inability to install anywhere. The activation thing is unnecessary IMO, as it's overall a great software. GSA software can be installed anywhere, you just can't RUN two processes at the same time.

 

[dandez]

Have both of them. After some years spent with scrapebox and hrefer I gave Gscraper a go. To be honest, for me it's the best and fastest scraping tool at the moment when it comes to built a huge lists for instance for xrumer posting.
It can generates milions result within short period of time.
Disadvantage is high cost of proxies for gscraper. Without it forget about using it.

 

[nsfwish]

Never herd of it, I will check it out and maybe post my experience later.

 

[sniper135]

gcraper is faster than scrapebox

 

[Vesania]

Gscrapper for scrapping and scrapebox for everything else at least for me.

 

[JustUs]

Only issue I have with scrapebox is the inability to install anywhere. The activation thing is unnecessary IMO, as it's overall a great software. GSA software can be installed anywhere, you just can't RUN two processes at the same time.

Another issue with Scrapebox is that if you are using a dynamic IP that you change frequently, then ScrapeBox takes a long time to boot. If you shutdown SB and do not change the IP, then it will boot quickly, but as soon as you change the IP and boot, it again takes a long time to come up.

 

[muxmkt]

So, i really dont know which one to buy, Gscraper or Scrapebox.

This thread is more than 1 year old, what you guys think these days?

I wont use the Proxy Sub on Gscrapper, more like using semi pvt proxies.

I should go with Scrapebox or Gscraper?

Regards

 

[brianpog]

Will check on this

 

[WinningIO]

So, i really dont know which one to buy, Gscraper or Scrapebox.

This thread is more than 1 year old, what you guys think these days?

I wont use the Proxy Sub on Gscrapper, more like using semi pvt proxies.

I should go with Scrapebox or Gscraper?

Regards

For strictly scraping + proxies, go with Gscraper. Scrapebox advantage is its add-ons.

 

[ID Internet Marketer]

i tried gscraper a week ago, yes it's faster than sb
agreed with WinningIO

 

[muxmkt]

After researching Scrapebox addons i bought it =)

 

[gtownfunk]

Seems like targeted is way better than volume, do either of these tools have a serious advantage over one another in the targeting (niche or by geolocation)?

gtownfunk