Quick SPAM Study - Ranking Web 2.0

[TheAdvertisingMan]

I am testing to rank a site with purely spam backlinks as many others here have already tried. (Let me recommend you Seocrab's spamathon.) Thought some of you would be interested in results of my experiment so Ive made this thread.

I choosed to use web 2.0 as it has more authority and should (at least normally) rank faster with less effort than fresh site. Goal of this web 2.0 is to produce as many email subscribers to my money site as possible. The blasting has already started and I'll be posting SERP updates. If this quick study is successful, it will be nice and effortless source of new subscribers. If this experiment isn't successful, I will be happy that it was tried at least.

KW Exact searches: ~2500 / month
KW Competition: Low

Spammy backlinks blasted: 450,000+ (within past 2 days)
Spammy backlinks crawled: 1,200+

Site position: N/A

Expenses so far: $5

 

[mickyfu]

If the comp is low, then why go for a spam method, when you could easily rank it with SEO that will not eventually get your site hit.

 

[TheAdvertisingMan]

If the comp is low, then why go for a spam method, when you could easily rank it with SEO that will not eventually get your site hit.

I want to try the effect of spammy backlinks. (Especially I'm curious if it takes less time to rank.) And if something go bad, I can easily replace that web 2.0 with safer one.

 

[TheVigilante]

gonna follow your journey mate...

 

[mickyfu]

Where did you get 450,000 web2 for $5?

 

[TheAdvertisingMan]

gonna follow your journey mate...

Thanks man

Where did you get 450,000 web2 for $5?

Those 450,000 backlinks are blog comments from Fiverr. But I am trying to rank a web 2.0.

 

[Zoomer3690]

Thanks man


Those 450,000 backlinks are blog comments from Fiverr. But I am trying to rank a web 2.0.

Are you only using a fiverr $5 gig for this?

 

[shailzrocks]

I can assure that will work. When Done with more power you can expect results like below.

 

[TheVigilante]

I can assure that will work. When Done with more power you can expect results like below.

wow hes achieved those results with .webs holy cow....

 

[ceosam]

Great case study. Keep us updated OP.

 

[charlie3]

I can assure that will work. When Done with more power you can expect results like below.

Are those just blog comments like in the OPs study?

 

[lloughry]

I can assure that will work. When Done with more power you can expect results like below.

that is wild that you rank #1 on big G and don't even show up on Yahoo and Bing.

 

[shailzrocks]

Are those just blog comments like in the OPs study?

Nope. It requires lot more than that..

 

[TheAdvertisingMan]

Are you only using a fiverr $5 gig for this?

Yes, for now. If the site get stuck somewhere else than top 3, I will consider more options.

I can assure that will work. When Done with more power you can expect results like below.

Amazing. It's shame my niche has not so many searches. :sad:

 

[charlie3]

Nope. It requires lot more than that..

So they are spammy links though? I'm just trying to figure out the relevance between your results and the OP's method.

 

[ikilledkenny]

Nope. It requires lot more than that..

shailzrocks, mind giving a few hints? not the spoon way, just a direction.

OP, i'll follow your thread, good luck

 

[SocialMediaManager]

All depends upon competition long tail keywords with low competition can rank with spammy links in my opinion but are not stable

 

[SOCOM]

What are people's opinions on blasting Blogspot because I've always seemed to ignore it because Google owns it.

 

[shailzrocks]

What are people's opinions on blasting Blogspot because I've always seemed to ignore it because Google owns it.

You are wrong. Tried and tested.

They do get washed off and is very volatile.

 

[SOCOM]

You are wrong. Tried and tested.

They do get washed off and is very volatile.

How can someone be wrong when they ask a question lol