Video deleted after buying likes and views?

[kuryakin]

So I had a video ranking at no.2 for my chosen KWs and today I got this message:

"You agree not to use or launch any automated system, including without limitation, "robots," "spiders," or "offline readers," that accesses the Service in a manner that sends more request messages to the YouTube servers in a given period of time than a human can reasonably produce in the same period by using a conventional on-line web browser. blah blah blah..

That's just a bit of it but you get the gist.. The video has been deleted by Youtube. So, my question is- what was it that caught their attention? Things I have done to rank it were: 20,000 views (high retention from a reputable seller on BHW.) Likes (from fiverr) More likes through Addmefast and a blast of bookmarks to the video URL.

I'm thinking it was Addmefast that got me but maybe someone else can shed more light?

Cheers

 

[salwek4]

How quick you got those video ranked?

 

[kuryakin]

Really quick, like 3 days

 

[kuryakin]

Was that too fast? Maybe I raised some flags..

 

[undiesman]

You bot your views and if youtube picks it up, it gets deleted. There are no flags or rules to avoiding this.
Although I do realize using shitty scripts get your video deleted a week later 80% of the time.

 

[faibol]

"more than a human can reasonably produce in the same period by using a conventional on-line web browser"

you probably recieved the views too fast and a youtube bot found your video...

also who's the provider?

 

[zmijatalas]

If that are false views (BOT, F5 All the day) they you should get real views (Exhange services)

 

[faibol]

If that are false views (BOT, F5 All the day) they you should get real views (Exhange services)

your video can get deleted as a result of exchange sites as well...

 

[AnthonyCorleone]

you purchased views from someone who still using public method that's been detected by youtube recently
some providers still using it and is bad )) ether way that's 101% why your video got deleted

P.S. exchange networks they allowed by youtube TOS is call "online promotion" and can't not harm your videos duh

 

[izkech]

They deleted the video for the mass blast of views...It happened to me too...but some video received less than 4000 views and are also deleted, with a warning: next time they suspend the entire account !!

 

[AnthonyCorleone]

They deleted the video for the mass blast of views...It happened to me too...but some video received less than 4000 views and are also deleted, with a warning: next time they suspend the entire account !!

the way is works when they recently patched/filtered the public method, people solve the problem by increasing view per ip more likely 50 views from 1ip in 1 sec.
that's only way the public method works right now but is risky as f... and good way of killing videos in no time is doesn't matter u got 1k views or 100k views if is boosted with public method is at huge risk

 

[faibol]

the way is works when they recently patched/filtered the public method, people solve the problem by increasing view per ip more likely 50 views from 1ip in 1 sec.
that's only way the public method works right now but is risky as f... and good way of killing videos in no time is doesn't matter u got 1k views or 100k views if is boosted with public method is at huge risk

what method are you exactly talking about? is it the one Dagreyon shared 2 months
ago or was there another method that was shared publicly?

also i don't see any complaints on providers pages expect for skittle's thread...
so i doubt they are using public methods...

 

[HeRBaR]

Change your views provider, and make sure to order High retention views.
Ask your provider to send the views slowly and not too fast... This will fix the problem

 

[AnthonyCorleone]

what method are you exactly talking about? is it the one Dagreyon shared 2 months
ago or was there another method that was shared publicly?

also i don't see any complaints on providers pages expect for skittle's thread...
so i doubt they are using public methods...

they all same, but when you share methods in public ask your self how many videos your supplier boosted with this method, when methods in public expect mass ban anytime soon, for some people takes 1 lesson to learn it and others will be stepping on same rake

Change your views provider, and make sure to order High retention views.
Ask your provider to send the views slowly and not too fast... This will fix the problem

more like ask your provider don't send s#@t tons views from 1ip

 

[faibol]

they all same, but when you share methods in public ask your self how many videos your supplier boosted with this method, when methods in public expect mass ban anytime soon, for some people takes 1 lesson to learn it and others will be stepping on same rake

i seriously don't know what you are talking about... i really don't think that they are using the same methods...
why would [FONT=Tahoma, Calibri, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif]Dagreyon share a method in public if he's using that method himself? to kill the competition of course... stupid move if you ask me since it brings youtube one [/FONT][FONT=Tahoma, Calibri, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif]step closer to closing other methods, but i guess some people only use their brain when it's convient

any serious supplier would know not to use a public method since it's doomed once it's public... so again, i doubt it...
[/FONT]

 

[AnthonyCorleone]

i seriously don't know what you are talking about... i really don't think that they are using the same methods...
why would Dagreyon share a method in public if he's using that method himself? to kill the competition of course... stupid move if you ask me since it brings youtube one step closer to closing other methods, but i guess some people only use their brain when it's convient

any serious supplier would know not to use a public method since it's doomed once it's public... so again, i doubt it...

I mean methods he shared they all based on same bug/whole

http://s.youtube.com/api/

didn't mean all providers using same ))
and why he shared because maybe he try kill competition but instead he kill hes supplier/partner and latter on there's a goes mass ban and again he goes do a same thing and again there's go mass ban why he harming him self and everyone else around him idk ask him i guess you right about brains

 

[faibol]

I mean methods he shared they all based on same bug/whole didn't mean all providers using same ))
and why he shared because maybe he try kill competition but instead he kill hes supplier/partner and latter on there's a goes mass ban and again he goes do a same thing and again there's go mass ban why he harming him self and everyone else around him idk ask him i guess you right about brains

of course the methods have similarities... they are targeting the same website after all... but i'm sure
there's more than one bug / loop hole and they can be manipulated differently since coders can think
differently...

i agree with your second paragraph...

 

[AnthonyCorleone]

of course the methods have similarities... they are targeting the same website after all... but i'm sure
there's more than one bug / loop hole and they can be manipulated differently since coders can think
differently...

i agree with your second paragraph...

the way it triggers the more view per ip u send the higher risk to ban your video and before with 5 view per ip it was all fine but now this method wouldn't be 1:1 ratio unless there's 50 view per 1ip or 50k traffic per 1k views now of course is cheaper increase requests then buy 50x more traffic lol

or find your self new method which is not hard if you think outside the box )) or outsource if you don't wan a deal with that

 

[faibol]

the way it triggers the more view per ip u send the higher risk to ban your video and before with 5 view per ip it was all fine but now this method wouldn't be 1:1 ratio unless there's 50 view per 1ip or 50k traffic per 1k views now of course is cheaper increase requests then buy 50x more traffic lol

or find your self new method which is not hard if you think outside the box )) or outsource if you don't wan a deal with that

i think i heard about the method you are referring to... but it seems like it's patched so it doesn't matter whether you send 1 view per ip or 50 views... but i wouldn't really know... i'm not a provider nor do i use YouTube at the moment...

my point was that there's more than 1 method and supplier probably aren't using the one you are talking about...
but i could be wrong... just out of curiosity, do you use a views method?

 

[AnthonyCorleone]

i think i heard about the method you are referring to... but it seems like it's patched so it doesn't matter whether you send 1 view per ip or 50 views... but i wouldn't really know... i'm not a provider nor do i use YouTube at the moment...

my point was that there's more than 1 method and supplier probably aren't using the one you are talking about...
but i could be wrong... just out of curiosity, do you use a views method?

well they not really patched they just put heavy filters on it and to bypass them u have to increase view per ip already explained etc..
the point they all same base of same bug/whole/niche might be coded differently but on the end u get same results
and im not pointing to anyone who using it or not just saying it those who still using it should stop it before is too late but is up to them if they wan a take risk
ether way I can care less about that))