Its Happened Today ( Google Changes its Logo and Navigation bar)

[PureSalt]

Google changed its Logo and Homepage.

It has recently confirmed this two changes and this changes appears in all over the world. Recenlty Yahoo updated its logo and Microsoft Bing Search tool also updated after the yahoo changes.

I think this is Logo changing Year.

According to this, users not click the icons made up of small square and not access the Google Drive Storage, Youtube videos and Android Applications.

But the Logo has no difference from Old Logo !!

Tell Your suggestions.

 

[SkyrocketSEO]

Huh? Google changed logo? What?

 

[seocrab]

The 'new' logo makes no sense, it's like a game of spot the difference:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24170053

Also, OP, cryptic much?

 

[azeds]

Only change is they've made it 'flat'.

 

[SEORasta]

What they did not tell you is though the "new" logo can now track your every move and tell what you type, read and think!

 

[Black.Star]

What they did not tell you is though the "new" logo can now track your every move and tell what you type, read and think!

 

[DanTe_0101]

"It is the first change to Google's logo since 2010. Not all users will be able to see the redesign yet."
Its same old ass logo for me.

 

[Goal Line Technology]

I think it is not just a change of logo,
but a strategic plan to boost the popularity of Google +
if you read between the lines

 

[GoGetRanked]

Big Gee has been saying they are going to give more "value" to social shares in terms of links
and i have been reading today on some blogs , people have tested it and there apparently is some significance being given
but not anything substantial yet ..
but here is where i lose it
so lets suppose 1 year or so down the line g+ is more popular than fb ..and big gee is going to start using it as a variable in ranking ..
doesnt that technically become a monopoly ..? unlawful in the US ? ( read at& breakup )
so i am really confused what their endgame is

anyone ?

regards,
ToG

 

[Goal Line Technology]

Big Gee has been saying they are going to give more "value" to social shares in terms of links
and i have been reading today on some blogs , people have tested it and there apparently is some significance being given
but not anything substantial yet ..
but here is where i lose it
so lets suppose 1 year or so down the line g+ is more popular than fb ..and big gee is going to start using it as a variable in ranking ..
doesnt that technically become a monopoly ..? unlawful in the US ? ( read at& breakup )
so i am really confused what their endgame is

anyone ?

regards,
ToG

They are simply going to stem the flow of potential competitors
by competing with them in their own backyard.
I do not think that they will get away with everything the manner in which they
will truly become a monopoly, but more of a merger type approach,
so that their bottom line is not reduced by any signifant amount.

I do not think that it is an overly aggressive marketing approach,
they want to be in it for the long haul, and this is just a step in the
correction of the dynamics for them.

 

[mogul1123]

Yeah, i also see the changes, I think it's good to use a box to get all the categories for each type of search !