Why Would You Use UD/Licorne/SeNuke XCR For Web 2.0s?

[Quattroporte]

So something is confusing me here, and hopefully somebody can clear it up for me .

I've noticed you can create Web 2.0 properties with the software I've listed in the title, but aren't your 2.0s supposed to be mini-authority sites in themselves? If I'm understanding this correctly, these tools only create the 2.0, and put one post on it. Aren't your 2.0s supposed to have something like 5-10 posts, with an About Me and all (basically supposed to look like real blogs)? These tools are just making a one-post Web 2.0...why would you ever use this?

Wouldn't you have to create all your 2.0s by hand?

 

[Riders On The Storm]

by hand?

everyone does, some even pay

 

[jeromespitfire]

In the long run, making hand made web 2.0 properties will achieve higher and longer lasting rankings. However with a very well spun article, posting using software can still achieve very good results but are more prone to getting unnatural links warnings from google. You can still rank for a lot of keywords using purely spammy web 2.0 if done right, but the rankings generally don't last more than a few months.

 

[srinu0812]

Manually built Web 2.0s work wonders. Period.

 

[extremeboy]

Manully build Web2.0s looks really instead of spammy crap

 

[SimonRohde]

Currently i only had made a few web 2.0s.

 

[sahilsxy29]

tier 1 - manual with unique content along with images / videos with multiple posts.

tier 2 - softwares.. but the quality should be good.

 

[Quattroporte]

Thanks everyone. When I eventually purchase Ultimate Demon, I guess I'll be skipping over the Web 2.0 section.