Same Sex Marriage

Status
Not open for further replies.
As a straight male,I don't get people who care if same sex marries another.


Because those people are ignorant and insecure with themselves.

Those same people most likely believe and pray to a god, because they are too weak to believe in themselves.
 
Because they don't have the same human rights as you, the parades etc. are for creating awareness. I'm gay and I'm not a fan of parades and all that gaylordness, but I see the actual value in it, the masses will likely accept that we cannot be all the same, just like they did with blacks, women or every imaginable minority, of course haters will never disappear and radical governments can revert people's minds back to the dark ages, but there is a growing tendency of acceptance.

I don't think of marriage as being a human right. When I say this, I mean the legal institution of marriage. Being with the person you love should not be touched by any law except those requiring consenting adults.

lsmstd, are you really asking for and prepared to be treated like blacks and women in modern society? Does that seem at all appealing?

To use those two groups as examples: We have now brand new ways to discriminate against black people based on rap music and women objectifying themselves after their great-grandmothers won them their rights. How do you see gay culture "identifying" itself stereotypically, and overcoming it, in the way black culture and feminist culture are struggling with rap and slut-feminism?

@Dagreyon - :\ the laws aren't being passed because of bleeding hearts. They're being passed to stop gay people from parading, to increase tax revenue, and to get them to stop dating around and "fagging" the place up. This was the same issue with allowing other minority groups rights: get them to shut up, pay up, and straighten up.

There should be no scientific experiments, no space exploration, no tax return for you, no new law defending your rights as a human and not a single step forward or change because people are dying in Africa. Think harder.
Also we should ban couples from marriage if they cannot have babies because they are not useful for the survival of our race. :))

Have you noticed the gay issue only gets moved forward when more important matters at hand, affecting global stability, are being ignored?

Everyone, except the hateful and backward, realize that people are people and love is love. Marriage as straight people know it will never be harmed by gay people getting married, which is why I never had a problem with the idea, but I am against forcing religious places to have to hold services for a gay marriage, just as I'm against a religion being forced to hold another religions' services in their own place of worship. I haven't seen many Bar Mitzvahs in Hindu Temples. But why not? Is that discriminatory too?

I have never understood why a legal union type deal, not called a marriage, but completely respected in the same way by the law, is not acceptable by the gay community.

And Yes, we need to seriously reconsider who gets to reproduce, yes, without a doubt. And we already do in very real ways.

Because it is true, women rarely cheat and if when they do its because the man wasn't loving her enough. So its still the mans fault for the divorce not the womans.

Contrary to horny popular belief, men are not biologically built to cheat to increase reproductive success, but women are. Women are the cheaters in the wild, not men. Men just spread seeds in different fields and smile at the growth, women are the ones who are constantly changing their hormonal balances, and with them, their appetites and desires. Women will change what kind of man they want based on the time of year, a man does not do this. A woman requires much more self-control than a man to not cheat, regardless of how sweet or innocent they appear.

This reality that men are open, chill, and confident with reproduction is why it is Bros before Hos: You can always find another girl, you're built for it, and if your girl is giving problems, think SERIOUSLY as to why that is. She always thinks you're cheating, or with other girls when you're out with the guys. Is she just innocent and worried? NO. She's a woman, she's trying to make sure she has dominated you, as is her nature. This why women will rarely allow their girlfriends to be alone with their boyfriend. It's not him she's worried about...

A man who cheats isn't a man, because he wasn't a man enough to find the women he wouldn't cheat on. A man with multiple women is not a cheater tho, unless he commits to one and breaks that commitment. It's simple, really: The things that make you feel like you're all powerful and can do whatever you want are the things that make you a complete bitch in the eyes of masculinity itself. Genghis Khan was a cunt(edit: sensitivity...but i seriously never use that other word to describe gay people. ever.).
 
Last edited:
Wow, I didn't know same sex marriage can be monetized as well. Business people sure are thinking of new ways to earn money
 
BHW is such a sexist anti female forum, no wonder there's barely any female members.
 
So yippee the gays can marry for whatever it's worth to them. Will it bring them the acceptance they desire; probably not.


Gay marriage isn't about "acceptance", it's about fucking civil rights. You are the very definition of ignorance. So i guess minorities should still sit in the back of the bus?

No government has the right to tell people how they are allowed to live their lives or who to love.
 
Last edited:
no_guy_meme_postkarte-rd17afb3ef19d403c9f6d70e611f2e033_vgbaq_8byvr_512.jpg
 
Yes I do thnk that, im not a caveman that believes women are property.

I don't mean to imply that you're a caveman, nor that women are property.

But to say that women simply don't cheat (or at least, to say 999/1,000 times the cheater is the man) is patently untrue.

Women and men are statistically roughly equal in terms of infidelity. Different studies will show you slightly different numbers, but just trust me on this one - women cheat. And so do men.

Women and men are both sexual creatures.
Women and men both cheat, just as much as each other.
Infidelity goes deeper than 'it's the man's fault because he doesn't love enough!' and divorce goes much deeper than 'he cheated - it's his fault!'
 
Last edited:
I don't give a single fuck about gay marriage - sure, why not. What I do oppose is adoption by gay couples.

Why? Think the kids might catch the 'gayness'? Growing up in a dysfunctional, abusive 'normal' family would be better? How about foster care, would that be better? How about on the street, would that be better than being raised by gay people?

Really would like to hear the logic behind your having an opinion about it, one way or the other.

Thats complete hogwash. So youre saying that everyone either likes both the natural AND unnatural intercourse or the unnatural intercourse.. that makes no sense. I can say I am 110% straight with or without societal pressures. Ive never had a single thought that I might be interested in the same sex and am completely grossed out at the slight thought of it.

Your bias is showing...there is no such thing as 'normal' anything. Just because you find it gross doesn't make it that way for everyone. Just out of curiosity, does lesbian porn gross you out, too?

My problem is with re-defining a word to satisfy the political correctness of any group. We may just as well re define warfare as peace and say most of the world is at peace.

A marriage has been, for the most part fro the beginning of time, a union between a an and a woman.

Now suddenly, to satisfy a bunch of spoiled elitist liberals with nothing better to do, we have to modify our very language to satisfy their whimpering cries for attention, and reshaping the world in their image.

I personally do not care who you fuck as long as they or it wants to be fucked by you. I don't even care if you, bob the builder, and that cute little duck in the local pond wanna play hide the salami, it's not my business.

But it is not a marriage any more than it is an armored truck.

Call it a domestic union, a partnership, or make up a new word, lets call it s gamariage for all I care, but just because they want it to be a marriage doesn't mean we have to be force fed their desires.

Just because you decide to define something a certain way, doesn't mean everyone will have the same definition. I've heard more than a few marriage ceremonies state that they are joining these two people...does that mean it's not a marriage because nobody mentioned man or woman?

I totally agree with this! That type of lifestyle is a choice in my opinion and people are free to choose. A child raised in that environment may not feel they have such choices and may feel forced to live such a lifestyle although it feels alien and unatural to them.

You mean like gay people, that are predisposed to it and through no choice of their own - not a choice anymore than you choosing the acceptable lifestyle, feel being raised by heterosexual parents? If so many of them have bowed to the pressure of living up to the relationship that their parents have, would we be having this discussion?

It, like so many things in life, basically boils down to if you don't want one, don't have one. Worry about your damn self and leave everybody else the hell alone to take care of their own shit. Seems pretty simple...
 
Last edited:
I know many (well 5) same sex couples, and I would not hesitate at all if any of them were to become parents. I see these people socially and they are a part of my family of friends. In all the cases in am personally familiar with, these gay couples are as loving, caring, and nurturing as any heterosexual couples I know, and a damn site more fun to hang out with than many.

I personally believe that someone raised up to think their sexual preference somehow taints them will go out of their way to allow their child to grow up without any pressure along those lines.

I love it when the anti gay crowd starts with the "abomination" talk, it seems the only book of the bible they read is Leviticus. I would have a hell of a lot re respect if they were protesting at Red Lobster, or at Macys too, but they only remember the gay abomination.

Dammed selective on their abominations if you ask me..



I totally agree with this! That type of lifestyle is a choice in my opinion and people are free to choose. A child raised in that environment may not feel they have such choices and may feel forced to live such a lifestyle although it feels alien and unatural to them.

I do not condone homosexuality or same sex marriage, but I do say live and let live as long as it does not affect me and mine. My stepson is gay and I love him the same as I always have.... even though I don't think it is right.
 
BHW is such a sexist anti female forum, no wonder there's barely any female members.
i am a female and you can chat with me if you like and i'll not cheat on you after i've used your money
bye
tc
 
Everything comes an inch at a time. It will be here soon enough I promise.

That 's not an argument to start opposing something I 'm neutral about. I oppose things I 'm against of, obviously.
 
Why? Think the kids might catch the 'gayness'? Growing up in a dysfunctional, abusive 'normal' family would be better? How about foster care, would that be better? How about on the street, would that be better than being raised by gay people?

Really would like to hear the logic behind your having an opinion about it, one way or the other.

Because a kid is the outcome of a male-female process. Just as I oppose other people from violating your natural rights, I oppose you from violating the kid 's natural rights.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_and_Silo

In the Animal world male-male couples have been known to raise offspring of their specis.
 
In the Animal world male-male couples have been known to raise offspring of their specis.

Let 's wait for someone who is a supporter of positive human rights use that as an argument :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top