Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[shelblamad]

Nevermind my last post, I will contact you from tool I see the link now.

 

[pk_69]

99% of the users who run one or couple sites simply don't need this tool

if you think, 100% of users who has no sites don't need this tool...

If you are not agency and have bunch of clients you will kill your site very fast

that is typical fallacy reasoning, if you think on what you said you might realize that if one kills his site it would not be because he used our service, but because how he used it. As well as he probably would kill it much earlier had he got his hands to xrumer, while thousands of others still see xrumer as unreplaceble SEO tool.

 

[pk_69]

So why then they still are not being indexed. Either you not really do all those things, those indexing services are not working or web 2 posts just lost its reputation and value in google's eyes.

if you do linkbuilding - pls name me your top 5 link sources

 

[unattsfello]

you might realize that if one kills his site it would not be because he used our service, but because how he used it. As well as he probably would kill it much earlier had he got his hands to xrumer, while thousands of others still see xrumer as unreplaceble SEO tool.

And that is why I said you can kill your site quickly with this service because whole idea of this service is to create bulk links from the same set of sites. And that is why I said you better of with diversity approach. And if you buy from time to time multilevel services from BST you will save your sites and money and you don't need subscription for this.

 

[pk_69]

And that is why I said you can kill your site quickly with this service because whole idea of this service is to create bulk links from the same set of sites. And that is why I said you better of with diversity approach. And if you buy from time to time multilevel services from BST you will save your sites and money and you don't need subscription for this.

omg, let me guess what's coming next ...

 

[unattsfello]

omg, let me guess what's coming next ...

I was waiting for your guess, but got to go to work so I will leave it up with you.
Thanks for reputation man, I see you don't like when people criticize your soft but as you see I am far from being alone here so you could be better of discussing the issues instead of fighting all who are raising them.

 

[pk_69]

How do I request refund. I can't PM as I am not really on this forum, don't have enough posts.

Nevermind my last post, I will contact you from tool I see the link now.

we grant no question asked 30 days refund, there is no absolutely risk of trying our service.

edit: since you didn't submit your request, I assume you forgot that you need to register an account first

 

[pk_69]

I was waiting for your guess, but got to go to work so I will leave it up with you.
Thanks for reputation man, I see you don't like when people criticize your soft but as you see I am far from being alone here so you could be better of discussing the issues instead of fighting all who are raising them.

well, first of all - you're not criticizing our service, you are questioning if web2 work for SEO, and that's different.

second, you're not posing any viable arguments, except of the fact that you hit your site with thousands of links and got it in trouble. Again, how is it an argument against our service? We talked about this so many times and I see it everyday - new users who set up our system to post 100/day on each blog, all with links, and worst - using same (or very few) anchors. Did I tell you that Penguin is not real and you can ignore it? or anyone told you that the best use of the our service is to post 1000 links to your site, just because it's so easy?

And the last one - over the last couple of weeks our thread is flooded with bunch of fake users, who are obviously not our members, but trying to create a negative discussion and bring other services in our BST (which is clearly against the rule).

One good thing is - you do it in the such lame way, that I'm thinking that if this is your best, boy, you aren't a threat.
Thanks to mods I see quite a few of your "buddies" already banned and removed.

Why do you keep comparing our service to senuke? we are not in competition and, I'm sure, many of our users have senuke, ms and many other tools altogether with RankWyz.
Senuke is a all-in-one SEO tool and despite of dozens clones manages to keep it's positions and users are not fleeing despite of the other "similar, but much cheaper" clones.

In the same time last time I checked Senuke their web2 pack is seems to be weaker than ever - many low or no pr sites, success rate is terrible... like they gave up on web2..
I personally not a senuke user anymore, but I'm an active user of gsa, xrumer, sick and own many others.

If you want to "criticize" our service jump on something like:

- RankWyz supports largest set of high PR web2 blogging sites
- With all of the UI and anti-autoposting changes web2 sites implement almost daily, RankWyz manages to get close to 80% of success rate and we monitor our scripts in the real time, the success rate you will never get with desktop tools
- RankWyz actually enables it's members to make 500, 1000 and 5000 posts every day and build thousands blogs, impossible before with any other desktop tool
- RankWyz come a long way from time when we started and we are constantly adding new features, news sites and improving the system

And if you ask me why I'm raving about this - simply because this product is 18 month of my life working long days and nights and when I looked at what we have built - boy, that's something to be proud of

now peace.

 

[Ztak07]

why is the syndicated​ content so poor? The quality is unreadable and hardly ever matches the keyword. In addition why not add a feature that reposts other people's content with an attribution link? Is there an option to do this? I am o the $28 plan

I also bought some accounts from the store but it seems they do not support the HTML I need. Would it be possible to swap these accounts for Wordpress.com accounts?

 

[unattsfello]

- RankWyz supports largest set of high PR web2 blogging sites
- RankWyz actually enables it's members to make 500, 1000 and 5000 posts every day and build thousands blogs, impossible before with any other desktop tool

Oh man, I am really tired discussing it with you especially considering fact that I started just cautioning people about service and that it can lead to loosing ranking of their sites. Reason I cautioned them because I used your service for 3 months and my real sites lost its ranking. So it is fact. But you always twist my facts and come up with something like: we are biggest and greatest web 2.0 poster. We let you post thousands posts a day. And that is exactly what I was cautioning people about. Post even hundred links a day from your limited set of spammed sites and sooner or later you will get hammered. Of course your reply, no we just a tool and you should use other tools to diversify. And that is exactly what I was saying, that if I am going to spend money on SEO providers from BST for example (i am not pointing on any specific ) I will use multilevel services that gives diversity of sites and social signals. I will spend less and will get more quality. Sure I will get less links. But that is the whole idea, I don't need that many links from same sites nowadays, it will get suspicious very fast and sites will be penalized. I need less but more diverse and quality links to rank.
Now about jumping on these features of ours:
You claim is:

RankWyz supports largest set of high PR web2 blogging sites

Reality is: you have just handful of sites from your collection that are used by real bloggers, rest of them more like a low quality hubs that used by all seo tools, so they lost their authority with google some time ago.
Can you post the list of your supported sites and let see how many of them people will recognize.
Believe me, it will not be many, dozen or so. Ask people which platform they would choose shall they start their blog now, result will be amazingly spread across five or so sites and that is my friend is reality of your huge number of high pr sites support.

RankWyz actually enables it's members to make 500, 1000 and 5000 posts every day and build thousands blogs, impossible before with any other desktop tool

That dubious achievement is exactly what I was cautioning about, post thousand or even hundred links from the same sites and say bye bye to your money sites.

Anyways, it is beautiful morning where I am now and I don't want to spend my time on this thread any longer. I really got tired of this whole polemic. Yes I was bitter because I paid for service and got result where my sites lost ranking but I think I did not do anything terribly wrong by warning people to proceed with caution if they choose to. You in turn attack anybody who is not agree and mix it with some conspiracy against you and fake users and so on. Anyways one thing I agree with you that people are smart in majority and will figure out themselves, some sooner, some later.

 

[mikpel]

I see all plans now come with monthly blog accounts, great! pk_69 can you tell me how many of your supported platforms are indexable, d0f0ll0w? I would like to try that 28$/m plan and see if I could rank with 20 platforms and heavy tier-2 linking using GSA ser.

 

[pk_69]

why is the syndicated​ content so poor? The quality is unreadable and hardly ever matches the keyword. In addition why not add a feature that reposts other people's content with an attribution link? Is there an option to do this? I am o the $28 plan

I also bought some accounts from the store but it seems they do not support the HTML I need. Would it be possible to swap these accounts for Wordpress.com accounts?

Well, syndicated (or mashed) content is generated from bunch of scraped articles and it's good, but "technically" good - it's relevant, unique and gets indexed very well.
The big advantage of syndicated content is you can generate tons of it on autopilot. But this is not the content you would post on your main site where you expect visitors to read it.

As an alternative you can use other content sources - own articles, rss, news, article builder, all would be producing more readable content.

We do support other people's content syndication with attribution links, you need to use full content from RSS option, but it's not available in wyz plan.

As per accounts, create a ticket in our support system and we will figure it out.

 

[pk_69]

I see all plans now come with monthly blog accounts, great! pk_69 can you tell me how many of your supported platforms are indexable, d0f0ll0w? I would like to try that 28$/m plan and see if I could rank with 20 platforms and heavy tier-2 linking using GSA ser.

I don't have exact numbers right now, I would say "majority' of our supported sites are dof o ll ow.

btw, from the last year (penguin ???) there are more and more evidences that attributes of actual links are playing less and less role and this include nofollow tag.
I know examples when site was ranked for very competitive term exclusively with nofollow links. Some even believe that it's a safest way to rank nowdays - with
tons of nofollow links.

I will post list of supported sites in the next post

 

[pk_69]

RANKWYZ - LIST OF SUPPORTED SITES

 

[mikpel]

I don't have exact numbers right now, I would say "majority' of our supported sites are dof o ll ow.

btw, from the last year (penguin ???) there are more and more evidences that attributes of actual links are playing less and less role and this include nofollow tag.
I know examples when site was ranked for very competitive term exclusively with nofollow links. Some even believe that it's a safest way to rank nowdays - with
tons of nofollow links.

I will post list of supported sites in the next post

You are right, the context the link comes from seems to be more and more inmportant than the link itself in these days.

What I'm concerned more is noindex flag that is triggered easily with some platforms by using automated tier-1 building. For example I can't get my blogs indexed on livejournal.com, jigsy.com, jimbo.com and some others because they block my entries in robots.txt.

I guess I just have to try and see if I can avoid noindex with your service.

 

[G0D0VERY0U]

You are right, the context the link comes from seems to be more and more inmportant than the link itself in these days.

What I'm concerned more is noindex flag that is triggered easily with some platforms by using automated tier-1 building. For example I can't get my blogs indexed on livejournal.com, jigsy.com, jimbo.com and some others because they block my entries in robots.txt.

I guess I just have to try and see if I can avoid noindex with your service.

You can get the login information for your blogs from RankWYZ, so if you do find some nofollow links you can go in and delete the link.

It's really not a big deal overall.

That having been said, test out a sample of the blogging platforms available and if or when you find some that a no follow - just don't get any more of those account if you can avoid it, or alternatively - put them in a lower tier network of accounts.

There's no reason not to tier links when you can control thousands of blogs like this.

But for the record: it is possible to rank sites purely on no-follows. It's not easy, but possible. I have plenty of sites that had a lot of no-follow links not get touched by the Penguin update just a few weeks ago, so it doesn't appear Google takes them into account for punishment either.

 

[b520fp0]

Thanks for the informative posts Godoveryou and PK_69.

Our objective in buying this service, is to build a network of blogs that will give a nice ranking boost to our sites as links with more PR and authority are much better than what we were getting trying to use Magic Submitter awhile ago.

Currently we are buying services that are really working well right now, but we want to reduce our cost and have better quality control over our links.

I figured my options were to start buying domains and hosting them on different accounts or try and use Web 2.0 blogs. It seems to me the big risk with using Web 2.0 blogs is that they may be deleted after a lot of work being put into them. So we really want to figure out the best long term automated/semi-automated strategy for the content and linkbuilding to them. I was concerned that throwing links from a tool like GSA might hurt the blogs. Maybe I need to have a more relaxed attitude about throwing low quality, automatically generated links at the blogs we are building for authority?

I would think the auto smashed up content might be good enough for the search engines, but I am worried this will be the reason of the blog eventually being deleted or de-indexed. So far the best sounding solution for the content may be generating super-spun content from Ubertoolz.

Anyway, just trying to figure out my best options that are automated but not too risky just like eveyone else.

Thanks again.

 

[pk_69]

RANKWYZ UPDATE - RANKWYZ IS ONE YEAR TODAY - SOCIAL BOOKMARKING OPENED FOR USERS

We have worked hard for the last couple of months to finish social bookmarking module.
Up until today we manage to create 33 high pr bookmarking scripts and 28 account registering scripts and continue adding more scripts daily. We are on our target to have 50 sites coded soon and keep working to have no less than 100 bookmarking sites.

I will do videos soon, but it similar to our blogging submissions configuration and easy for our active users to try.

If you are interested to give it a try and provide as with the feedback and you're not afraid to hit some early problems, post your interest it this thread http://www.rankwyz.com/forum/discus...ear-today-social-bookmarking-opened-for-users and I will send 30 social accounts to first 30 users who are interested to give it a test ride.

list of currently supported sites

host,pr
-----------
fave.net,3
delicious.com,8
diigo.com,7
linkagogo.com,5
rstat.us,5
transferr.com,5
ttlink.com,5
url.org,4
heello.com,4
slashdot.org,8
stumbleupon.com,8
jumptags.com,6
bibsonomy.org,7
linkarena.com,8
folkd.com,6
youmob.com,5
segnalo.virgilio.it,7
hatena.com,7
newsmeback.com,5
look-at-that.com,2
directoryfirms.com,1
alplist.com,1
networkingsocial.info,2
yemle.com,2
congresomundialjjrperu2009.org,4
dropjack.com,5
bukmark.net,3
social-bookmarking.net,5
bebeame.net,2
blog.mn,2
pusha.se,5
weblinkr.com,1
memori.qip.ru,5

 

[pk_69]

RANKWYZ UPDATE - New Linkset Options, Improved Quick Start Template and New Content Source

We have release several updates over this weekend, some based on various user requests and some improvements for our existing functionality.


1. option to add custom sites with email post enabled
this option will be useful for those who want to post on email post enabled sites.


2. linkset anchor lists (primary,secondary,generic) are now supporting spun content
this might be useful for those who uses third party services to prepare anchor variations using spintax format


3. linkset - support for prefix and suffix anchors
Anchor variation is a must part of linkbuilding today. We are already support combination of primary, secondary and generic lists and today we have extended linkset to support prefix and sufix lists.


Simple demo how it works
- Anchor list: SEO Services, SEO Company
- Prefix: Best,To learn more about
- Suffix: read more,click here, Toronto


If both prefix and sufix lists enabled system will be generating anchors like "Best SEO Service Toronto"


You can enable/disable prefix/suffix lists separately for both primary and secondary anchor lists.

4. quick start form - additional content source options.
Since we released "quick start" form it become the most popular way many users set up their submissions. It's literally takes 1 min and set up and let get notified when everything is completed. Now we extended "Quick Start" form to support other content sources - own articles and articlebuilder.

and a small teaser at the end
5. new content source - social aggregation
we are always looking for a new source of the good and relevant content and our latest addition - news aggregation is proven to be a great source of highly readable and relevant content and actively used by many of our users.
There is one concern though with news aggregation - you need to make sure that there is enough news ...


We are in the final stage of testing a new content source - social aggregation which will give you a tenfold more of relevant pages to extract content from and the best part - unlike news many of them are not even indexed yet...
stay tuned


For more details and to leave your feedback visit http://www.rankwyz.com/forum/discus...d-quick-start-template-and-new-content-source

 

[pk_69]

RANKWYZ UPDATE - Social Bookmarking is Open to All Users, Account Store Improved - Support for Multiple Networks, Social Sites


After few more extra days of last minute changes we think social bookmarking is ready
Everyone who expressed interest (sorry guys, only paid users) to test should find a "Social Test" network with 30 social accounts.




Account store is improved


You can now buy accounts into more than one network.
Now you can buy 1000 accounts into 5 network and blogs will be distributed between all selected network, each network will receive 200 blogs.


You can buy accounts into social networks.
Select network type (social), networks to send accounts to and start your social bookmarking campaigns.