Is negative SEO illegal?

trust me, it works, i do it for tons of clients...and no, it isn't illegal...it is strategy, plain and simple.

Oh god.. I love people who have no clue how the world works :D You're like the people who think they own the 20.000 usd a person accidently transfered to your account right?

This is turning into a kindergarden... Yes you can be sure its not okay to do "negative seo" on any website. Try take down a big firms website and openly discuss it on the internet and how you did it will your full name, I dare you :) I'm hundred percent sure the firm will file a police report on you, and sue you :)
 
1) ExpertPeon is one of the most intelligent and freedom-loving Members on BHW. Anyone that uses less than 50 words to express disagreement with him is an obvious retard.
2) Backlinks are speech, and I have a protected, God-given 1st Amendment right to do them and
3) The 2nd Amendment gives me the right to take your life if you try to take that right from me and,
4) Most of what you are all dancing around is called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference and,
5) Some of the people posting in this thread should not be allowed to have sex and breed more retards.

What everyone here has failed to mention is that whatever impact negative SEO has on a companies' rank, it's Google that is doing it. A "victim" of negative SEO can never make the claim that my actions forced someone to cause someone harm. If Google can't protect a "victim" from negative SEO, then maybe they should build a better fucking algorithm, right?

Another stupid thing is that there's a difference between "illegal" and "enforceable" and also if there is any kind of case law to support a particular interpretation of a law that may or may not exist. All these people saying, uh, um, I think uh, I read somewhere that uh, someone had, uh something bad happen to them because they did, uh something bad with backlinks or uh, um anyways I think negative SEO is illegal.

All these supposed "SEO's" so caught up in the theoretical. Talking about this abstract concept and that. Hay, here's a really stupid idea. Why doesn't someone post just one link showing just one conviction for someone doing something that could fairly be called "negative SEO". Duh. Hay, I gotta good idea, why don't folks use, uh.... GOOGLE.

Lol, all these "blackhat internet marketers" trying to GAME Google, can't even USE Google.
 
Fo' shizzle

Mah dizzle!

Sorry my English is really bad, but this is from a lawyer:


Here. You can learn a bit of English here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarmism

Alarmism is excessive or exaggerated alarm about a real or imagined threat e.g. the increases in deaths from infectious disease.[1]

The alarmist prefers intimidation and coercion to reasoned debate, and is often motivated by the desire to bring themselves to the forefront of discussion.

A discussion, I would add, that they are in no way qualified to participate in. Hence, the imaginary friend "the Lawyer". It's his imaginary friend "the Lawyer" that is qualified, and he becomes qualified by proxy (but not by actually knowing anything).

The benefit of this manipulative dynamic is that it gives him the ability to back off of any proxied statement that is proven to be false. He gets the excuse of language impediments, and he's bringing us credible information, but without being vulnerable to having the falseness of his statments challenged it directly.

You should post some authoritative links, or STFU and GTFO. (another english lesson for you)
 
I seriously can't belive you can be so ignorant Nigel Farang. I dont even know why I pick this discussion. Let me quote you again

What everyone here has failed to mention is that whatever impact negative SEO has on a companies' rank, it's Google that is doing it. A "victim" of negative SEO can never make the claim that my actions forced someone to cause someone harm. If Google can't protect a "victim" from negative SEO, then maybe they should build a better fucking algorithm, right?

How can you be so ignorant? I keep laughing for myself every time I read this. "ITS GOOGLE THAT IS DOING IT" LOL!

And what is more funny "BACKLINKS IS SPEECH". No offence you're just hillarious. Again I dare you to openly go make ruin a companies rankings in Google and OPENLY speak about what you're doing. I pay you to do this, just to see your silly ass in court.
 
Last edited:
I seriously can't belive you can be so ignorant Nigel Farang.

You should post some authoritative links, or STFU and GTFO. (another english lesson for you)

Ram's Musk,

Well first, you smell like goat piss. I have to mention this first because the odor is too wretching and disgusting to ignore.

Second, could you please inform me of your approximate age, and gender? I cannot publically whip a woman, or a child. Or an elderly person that has little or no experience on the internet.

It also might be useful if you can let us know what country/culture you are from, because there are many different cultures here, and people have dramatically different ideas about what "freedom" is, and if yours is different than mine, or you have no idea what freedom is, then it would a pointless argument to have if you think that "freedom" is spending your every waking moment enjoying the wonderous feeling of being enslaved to the State. So please post your definition of the word "freedom" and some cultural contex to put it into.

<back to flaming>
Okay, so I have recently learned that a lot of my "fights" online are with people that do not understand what I've said (in English), or I don't understand what they said (in English). But also, people are held accountable for the things they say (or at least some people act as if this is true), so this is the last time you get the "Solly, I no speakee thee Eegleesh" excuse. I have an all-American, Made in USA, 55-gallon solid steel drum of 100% pure American Whoopass. People that wield economy-sized cans of whoopass live their whole lives in fear of me, and spend great amounts of money to protect themselves from me. I am a fertilizer manufacturer that gives his product away for free.

Oh, and btw, you should watch the video of Humboldt County Sheriff's Deputies spraying pepper spray directly into the eyes of people protesting to keep their 250 year old old growth forest from being destroyed. I was never involved in that. Did you know that the IRS "profiled" conservative non-profits? They do this in order to honor the memory of one of the greatest leaders the world has ever seen.

Oh, and btw, you mocking my "backlinks are speech" argument means you don't even know what speech is. There isn't one site on the entire internet that doesn't open it's doors wide open for spammy backlinks, wider than a fat whore doing a gang bang with an entire African tribe. They WANT backlinks. They just think that only the backlinks they want should be posted. And who is qualified to do that for them? You? Do you want the power to determine what backlinks are allowed and what backlinks are not. <this is where I choose to not abuse him, but it would have been funny>

Again, post a link showing one conviction for the criminal act of "negative SEO" as defined as placing unwanted backlinks in order to gain what some people would describe as an unfair advantage in how Google determines it's search results.

So, either post a link, or STFU and GTFO.

Oh yeah, and PS...

PS
Occurred to me that spamming backlinks is in the general vicinity of illegal filesharing, in that someone presumes to tell you what 1's and 0's you are allowed to upload or download. And that the laws that can control one can be used to control the other. Anyone here want to trust Mr. Goat Piss to have that power?
 
Last edited:
not illegal in my country, doubt it's illegal anywhere
 
Back
Top