Which is better seo wise?

[inamon]

Hi,
I have a very ordinary question, but I couldnt find the exact answer searching Google.
Can anyone answer this.

While creating inbound links whether I should use file names, or use direct urls to those files?
For example...

My website is http://mywebsite.com
Now when I need to link up services page in the root directory should i use
<a href="services.html">Services</a>
or
<a href="http://mywebsite.com/services.html">Services</a>

Which has better seo value?

An one more thing..
For image files, should i use link to the image or just file and directory names?
In case of images will it vary load time?


Thanks for your time..

 

[onlinehitman]

For HTML-based sites, developers use the first option. But if it's a WP site (i.e. a dynamic one), one can use the second option. It doesn't make any difference as far as on-page SEO is concerned.

 

[UrsuAke]

For HTML-based sites, developers use the first option. But if it's a WP site (i.e. a dynamic one), one can use the second option. It doesn't make any difference as far as on-page SEO is concerned.

I agree with hitman. The spyders see the internal links any way and the authority is atributed the same. I've tested this a while back.

 

[inamon]

Thanks. It makes sense.
Sometimes we think search spiders to be too unsmart, but they arent.

 

[martha.ackles]

Hi Hitman, thanks for that info. I always thought the 2nd option is the correct one. Turned out you can actually do with both.

 

[vaservices]

Absolutely agree with onlinehitman! for image, should use file and directory names.
Good luck to you!

 

[virtualwebmarket]

no need to buy so many links. In that money you can buy traffic online.

 

[gtree]

For HTML-based sites, developers use the first option. But if it's a WP site (i.e. a dynamic one), one can use the second option. It doesn't make any difference as far as on-page SEO is concerned.

OP you can go with hitmans tip