AssociatedContent Method that Works for Me!

[noah37]

Thanks for the update. I didn't see how it would work at all.

 

[omgitsmogo]

Epic fail; I even completely revamped the first paragraph, and used wordflood to change words throughout the article and it still got denied

 

[jokerLA]

Hahahah this didn't work. I did exactly what you said and it got declined.

Epic fail; I even completely revamped the first paragraph, and used wordflood to change words throughout the article and it still got denied

can't be! my thread was opened on the 26th.. its been 3 days since then.. AC takes 10 at least, to approve/reject!
Only 2 options!
1. You lied.
2. You did not submitted for upfront payment.

lol at probably...that's not very convincing hahaha.

if you so afraid they can find you, get a damn proxy or some like that. that was just my opinion, to open an investigation and go to court with every fraudulent member they had.. they would be wasting $1000000's!

 

[hwolfpack6]

Want a screenshot? Would you?

Lol I seriously have no idea why you think I'm trying to foil your idea...it didn't work.

 

[jokerLA]

Want a screenshot? Would you?

your asking me for a screenshot? if that's correct then go back a little in this thread and you will find it.

 

[hwolfpack6]

your asking me for a screenshot? if that's correct then go back a little in this thread and you will find it.

Check my screenshots.

 

[jokerLA]

Check my screenshots.

the screenshot didn't opened up at first
well, did you changed the title as well?
how did you got reviewed so fast? it takes usually 10 days.. something is wrong here.

anyway i don't give a damn, i opened this thread with a method that works for me.

 

[IntensE]

nope its not working...

Feedback
This content appears under another author's byline at ****
Your account has been flagged for violating our Terms of Use or our Submission Guidelines.

too lazy to make screenshot and bla bla... submited 5 articles, all of them got rejected.

 

[tonlilaz]

why does it seem like the majority of pple that are complaining about this method are newbs w/out anything to prove? I mean come on...this is a method...take it or leave it. Don't sit and complain that it's not going to work...or that it didn't work...if this isn't going to work for you, then so be it...but don't come here and tear apart someone's idea. This is a sharing forum...and unless you've contributed your own $$ making ideas then shut the hell up.

Personally, i found the op's idea interesting, and i've got was to make it work for me. if it doesn't, oh well...if it does...well, that's another stack of cash for me.

 

[jokerLA]

i dont get how people are saying it doesn't work!
If you submit the article it takes about 10 days to get approved (and my thread is 3 days old)

well i keep making it daily and rarely get 1 article rejected.
This is a method that works for me i shared it, so try it or leave it.. im just sharing something that works for me

 

[IntensE]

tonlilaz do i seem like i complained? i was 80% sure from the start it wouldnt work as those articles doesnt pass copyscape, even when you rewrite an article it's not THAT easy... how would changing 2 sentences be allright ?

Regardless, i kept quiet and tryed it, used proxy, did everything allright, and joker for me it took 6 days for the articles to be reviewed, is it my fault that yours are taking 10 days ?

Again, i TRIED it , and didn't worked, wan't screenshots or you dont believe me lol.

 

[jokerLA]

in10sero just for your information, my thread is 4 days old... you got approved in 6 days wow you presumed the future know i was gonna open such a thread and did that... pretty good

and btw i don't need proof from you bcuz i dont give a damn! your the one not believing that im doing it and getting approved/published


---

not coming back to this thread, peace out

 

[Pofecker]

Thread Closed per OP request