clyde
Elite Member
- Dec 5, 2009
- 1,990
- 1,136
Built-in Pligg list updated!
Success rate:
1650 sites registered, 1350 posted to!
p/s: Posting should be higher if you're using two captcha solving services instead of just one.
Sure will. Should be out before 2013 comes.
Thanks for bringing it up.
To protect the integrity of the list, you can't. Sorry.
This too. We'll put this on the list of things to do.
Success rate:
1650 sites registered, 1350 posted to!
p/s: Posting should be higher if you're using two captcha solving services instead of just one.
"Hi,
No, it's not implemented at the moment. There aren't that many Pligg sites as of now so it will not have that much of an effect."
Hey Clyde, I think you misunderstood my meaning. It's preciesly because there are so few Pligg sites, that if you post to them over and over again your Pligg accounts are going to get banned rather quickly..... I do a great deal of bookmarking every day, and believe me posting to the same account/site over and over again will very quickly get your accounts banned.
An easy solution to prevent so many lost accounts is to post to the Pligg list randomly as opposed to a sequential order, in that way you are less likely to hit the same accounts many times in a row, saving all of us lots of catchas and time creating new accounts.
Please consider this for the next update, it really is worthwhile.
Thanks Clyde![]()
Sure will. Should be out before 2013 comes.
Thanks for bringing it up.
Just bought the software - however a little disappointed -- it seems like it doesn't post to top bookmarking sites such as Digg / StumbleUpon
Is this true?
Wher can I get a list of sites included ?
Thanks
To protect the integrity of the list, you can't. Sorry.
So I just noticed something um a bit strange!
When you schedule your bookmarks and set the post amount, it literally stops at the post amount including the failed sites ?! I can't believe no one has brought this up before ?! That is just a completely useless feature. I mean what are we supposed watch the monitor to see when we get the successful posts we wanted and hit stop. That is a really really poor design choice. I really hope your guys address that soon. i mean really nobody and I mean nobody is interested in stoping at some arbitrary "posted amount" that includes both successful and failed sites. I mean what if your fail rate was 50% what if it was 10% what if it was 80%, I mean the "posted sites" number is totally useless without knowing how many successful submission you have made.
End of rant
Anybody else with me on this one?
This too. We'll put this on the list of things to do.
Last edited: