[Case Study] Ranking A New Website From Scratch To Top

What do you mean?

For web 2.0 blogs - squidoo, blog.com, tumbl, etc. He ask why don`t use weebly also. Good thread, subsc. to my folder with "case studies".
 
For web 2.0 blogs - squidoo, blog.com, tumbl, etc. He ask why don`t use weebly also. Good thread, subsc. to my folder with "case studies".

Ah ok! Well I'll be doing 1 blog at a time so once I'm done with the ones listed in the diagram and they aren't enough to rank the website to the top then I'll use other web 2.0's as well
 
You will use only spun content?

Unique articles on web 2.0's, high quality spun article for article directories and crap spun article for wiki's
 
Hi, mate

I am wondering when u start building first tier links(exclusive of those web2.0) pointing to money site? I mean those links of wiki, bookmark..... circle around main money site

while u are doing these first tier links(exclusive web2), how u spread keywords? I mean how many keywords u include in there?

Once u complete one web2 circle, do u continue the same keywords with another circle, then another one... until this keyword climb to page1, then move to other keywords, repeat the circle?

or u just finish one circle for one or two you targeted keywords, then move to other keywords for the next circle??

Thanks:))





Unique articles on web 2.0's, high quality spun article for article directories and crap spun article for wiki's
 
Hi, mate

I am wondering when u start building first tier links(exclusive of those web2.0) pointing to money site? I mean those links of wiki, bookmark..... circle around main money site

while u are doing these first tier links(exclusive web2), how u spread keywords? I mean how many keywords u include in there?

Once u complete one web2 circle, do u continue the same keywords with another circle, then another one... until this keyword climb to page1, then move to other keywords, repeat the circle?

or u just finish one circle for one or two you targeted keywords, then move to other keywords for the next circle??

Thanks:))

I've scraped a list of 100+ LSI's and am using them along with my main keywords. For web 2.0's I'll just be using the main keywords in the articles and will use the same 100+ LSI's for their backlinks.
 
A question. What about your on page SEO/Website architecture? With those low levels of low comp, you could minimise your backlinking efforts by having a solid on page SEO strategy, thus minimising the levels of work you put into your backlinking and ranking high still.

Just my thoughts.
 
A question. What about your on page SEO/Website architecture? With those low levels of low comp, you could minimise your backlinking efforts by having a solid on page SEO strategy, thus minimising the levels of work you put into your backlinking and ranking high still.

Just my thoughts.

On page seo struture is as good as it should be.. I've even taken care of website's speed as it is counted as a factor too nowadays..
 
So I'm finally seeing some good changes in rankings.. 1 keyword has moved under 50 from under 200 and another has popped up at 241 today.. Here are the screenshots

image.jpg


image.jpg
 
How many links have you been building and for which of the 8 keywords is this? You should see improvement faster now you're ranking under 50.. Considered high pr blog posts??
 
This looks good, I can't wait to see how it goes.
 
Last edited:
How many links have you been building and for which of the 8 keywords is this? You should see improvement faster now you're ranking under 50.. Considered high pr blog posts??

#42 is keyword with 3,600 local searches and #241 is one with 880 searches. I've only finished 100 wiki links, 100 article submissions, 170 bookmarking, 20 reddit submissions, 20 stumbleupon submissions, 200 fb shares, 100 G+ shares and 100 retweets yet. Haven't made any web 2.0's yet. And still much of the backlinks I've created aren't indexed. For now I just want to stick with the plan that I stated in OP. I have other strategies as well which I will throw in if this doesn't get the website to the top alone.
 
Perfect case study, i am considering to try something very similar. Please keep us updated!

I personally think your backlink strategy will not be enough to rank for these 14k exact KWs-but maybe i am wrong! Could you share more info about your site? Is it some micro site with few articles or are you trying to create some heavy authority site?

thx
 
Perfect case study, i am considering to try something very similar. Please keep us updated!

I personally think your backlink strategy will not be enough to rank for these 14k exact KWs-but maybe i am wrong! Could you share more info about your site? Is it some micro site with few articles or are you trying to create some heavy authority site?

thx

It's a micro site. It currently has 5 article and I only intend to post 1 article every month.
 
Based on the original post, I see at least 3 very low competition keywords. Based on what you sayd, I take it that you aren't ranking 1st page for these (could be wrong), if this is true then something is wrong with your on page seo. With optimal on page seo I would expect to rank 1st/2nd page for the 1st, 3rd and 4th keywords you posted (the market samurai images).

Please tell us:
--> What you have done so far.
--> The number of articles you are posting on your web 2.0's.
--> What your meta name, description and keywords consist of.

This should be enough to see if you are doing something wrong.
 
Is your keywords generic or buying?
30 articles from articles directories,what does that mean? 30 unique articles in every web 2.0 ? or 30 articles points to web 2.0?
Is your strategy for each keyword separably? I mean you need to do that strategy for each keyword,so if you have 8 keywords,you need to do that job 8 times with different anchor text right?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top