Private Blog Network Suppliers

Private blog networks DO work. I'd have to agree with some previous comments though, run your own. A friend of mine runs his own network of about 70 websites, and his rankings have almost tripled in the last few months (post penguin/panda).
 
yes, a network done properly really works and give proper results.

Private blog networks DO work. I'd have to agree with some previous comments though, run your own. A friend of mine runs his own network of about 70 websites, and his rankings have almost tripled in the last few months (post penguin/panda).
 
Anyone interested in buying there own private network that is 100% their own, not shared in any way, with everything taken care of. Not just the domains, but hosting, content, CMS, etc, etc PM me. My partner will be offering them for sale as BST when it gets approve (which takes a while) but until then just PM me.
 
please do elaborate because i think you are delusional about this...

Sorry I missed your post. That's ok, it's a new concept so not everybody understands it. We have a blog network platform, it's not just a blog network like ALN, BMR or Link Authority. As a member you can build networks inside of it.

We have some semi private networks, a lot of people would call them "private" because you have to apply even if you are a member. I call them "semi" private because even with all the background checks etc on members, if Google was clever and determined enough then they could get in.

But we also have private networks, so even as a member you don't even know they exist unless someone invites you to it. It means that people that know eachother on forums can group up and each stick 5 sites in and all of a sudden you have a 50 site niche specific network. It's not going to get taken down unless you're doing something very stupid with your content or OBL profiles.

So, a blog network platform, instead of just a single blog network. That's how you can advertise publically, and still be safe ;)

I think I have seen this type of thing before. They restrict access to certain sites to certain people. That way no one person can out the network.

I am just speculating though, theres people on here far smarter than me that are probably way ahead of this method.

No, that's not how we do it, please see above :)
 
Private blog networks work really well, until they don't As long as its a nice kept secret, I can see them working very well. The only drawback is not to advertise them in public :)
 
I will suggest you to run your own network, this may help you in many aspects. Private blog networks are doing a great job.
 
As long as the network is truly private with quality content it will be ok. My networks support my projects and my clients. For me the most important rules to stay under the radar are:

- Host every website on separate hosts (different geo-location)
- Quality post with different length (huge footprint)
- No outsiders (strict control over the topics and content quality)
- Treat every website in the network like money site (no bulk/spam linkbuilding)

20-30 old Authority
domains could do wonders if you follow this rules.

If someone is interested could PM but it won't be cheap. I can do All the work:

1. Find
Old Authority domains
2. Set up hostings
3. Set up the websites
4. Deliver quality content

All domains will be with SeoMoz DA/PA 20+



We have some semi private networks, a lot of people would call them "private" because you have to apply even if you are a member. I call them "semi" private because even with all the background checks etc on members, if Google was clever and determined enough then they could get in.

But we also have private networks, so even as a member you don't even know they exist unless someone invites you to it. It means that people that know eachother on forums can group up and each stick 5 sites in and all of a sudden you have a 50 site niche specific network. It's not going to get taken down unless you're doing something very stupid with your content or OBL profiles.


So, a blog network platform, instead of just a single blog network. That's how you can advertise publically, and still be safe

Do you consider all the little signals we do not discuss often? Content length, content quality, domains quality, snitches, manual check etc. And for example what will happen if G decide to publish content in your networks? They just need to wait until it enters the index :)

Don't get me wrong I hope you service continues to work without any problems. It is probably great for the price but I personally will stay out of public networks.
 
I would also be interested in a private blog network that isn't open to public

I had another idea..

How about 10-15 of us start our own private blog network and this network will be used ONLY by us - so we could set the standards.

Would anyone be interested in this?

It would probably require initial investment of $500 + per person...
 
I would also be interested in a private blog network that isn't open to public

I had another idea..

How about 10-15 of us start our own private blog network and this network will be used ONLY by us - so we could set the standards.

Would anyone be interested in this?

It would probably require initial investment of $500 + per person...

This is exactly what the fightback network allows you to do.... but for about $50 instead of $500.
 
This is exactly what the fightback network allows you to do.... but for about $50 instead of $500.
There is a huge difference to own and to share. This network might be good for several months.
 
Do you consider all the little signals we do not discuss often? Content length, content quality, domains quality, snitches, manual check etc. And for example what will happen if G decide to publish content in your networks? They just need to wait until it enters the index :)

Don't get me wrong I hope you service continues to work without any problems. It is probably great for the price but I personally will stay out of public networks.

Like I said, it is technically possible that Google can get into the semi private networks, but not the private ones as I've already described. We have both.

There is a huge difference to own and to share. This network might be good for several months.

I think if you know the people (through forum, or JVs etc) then a shared network can last much longer. I have both private (just me) and shared networks (both with many others, and some networks with 3-5 others) for a mix of speed/expense/risk.
 
I know, the idea for your service is great .I just say More people = greater risk.
 
I know, the idea for your service is great .I just say More people = greater risk.

hands down the correct answer

i just find it funny that people think that mini public networks is the answer to a scalable seo campaign.

theres so many fundamentally flawed problems with "mini-networks" that still allow all of the wrong things in which other networks have fallen victim to deindexing.

how many of these little networks need to be deindexed before webmasters quit throwing in their high quality sites into this type of arrangement.

nothing will beat extremely high quality networks that are private, don't provide reports, and control the contnet creation and link distribution process..

but very few people know of these type of services which is nice for the rest of us.
 
hands down the correct answer

i just find it funny that people think that mini public networks is the answer to a scalable seo campaign.

theres so many fundamentally flawed problems with "mini-networks" that still allow all of the wrong things in which other networks have fallen victim to deindexing.

how many of these little networks need to be deindexed before webmasters quit throwing in their high quality sites into this type of arrangement.

nothing will beat extremely high quality networks that are private, don't provide reports, and control the contnet creation and link distribution process..

but very few people know of these type of services which is nice for the rest of us.

Obvioulsy I am getting in the business of selling 100% private networks so I should be agreeing with you but AGAIN that is NOT what the fightback network is. I don't understand why people have trouble understand how it works. They are not "mini-networks". They are EITHER fully private networks or Semi-Private networks (Your choice as to which you want to get into) that are as big or as small as you wnat (again your choice). Even if Matt Cutts himself joins the network he still couldnt de-index all the sites. and EVEEEN IF HE COULD (which he can't) the network has a link eject option.
 
Obvioulsy I am getting in the business of selling 100% private networks so I should be agreeing with you but AGAIN that is NOT what the fightback network is. I don't understand why people have trouble understand how it works. They are not "mini-networks". They are EITHER fully private networks or Semi-Private networks (Your choice as to which you want to get into) that are as big or as small as you wnat (again your choice). Even if Matt Cutts himself joins the network he still couldnt de-index all the sites. and EVEEEN IF HE COULD (which he can't) the network has a link eject option.

If they are fully private, what the hell is the point of using SEO fightback? Why would you even use the service and really keep it 100% private?
 
If they are fully private, what the hell is the point of using SEO fightback? Why would you even use the service and really keep it 100% private?

Its a really easy convenient system. You get 5 guys together to each throw in a 5 sites. Instead of emailing each other access or post or whatever you just have each install the plug-in and blam instant 25 site High PR private network. Each can post to the sites independent of each other. Without having to give direct access to the sites.
 
SEO Fightback looks interesting, but a lot of people don't want the hassle of putting their own sites into a network. I've had plenty of sites deindexed by networks that are shared like that.
 
Back
Top