manny521
Supreme Member
- Sep 15, 2011
- 1,449
- 370
Google will disappear in five years! Rejoice!
- Thread starter manny521
- Start date
bigeazy
Regular Member
- Feb 20, 2011
- 320
- 271
Idiots with their iphones think its the best thing since sliced bread.
Siri will take over search? Man go back to your flock, the Shepard is waiting.
There are way better phones out there than the iphone (i know this, I have owned plenty of em in my days)
Siri will take over search? Man go back to your flock, the Shepard is waiting.
There are way better phones out there than the iphone (i know this, I have owned plenty of em in my days)
AnotherOne
Senior Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 1,021
- 208
If Siri can replace Google search then we have a similar program in Android. Maybe he'll replace Siri on Apple.
SmartMan
BANNED
- Jul 25, 2012
- 673
- 1,253
Google did a whole lot of damage to their system in 2012 since they found.
They're making every webmaster to frown upon them for making them slavery to their stupid algorithms which picks only content rich sites.
They want you to be a poet by wanting the quotes on your article and then they want your article to look like it's written by Shakespeare because their bots like human friendly articles.
They want you to use Bulletin points and then they want you to spend 1/8 of your day to write a single article because that's what they think is useful to visitors.
My neighbor runs an offline business and owns a website to sell some stuff online. He said Adcenter traffic is cheap and converts a lot better than Adwords for his business. He doesn't have enough time to write articles on his own nor to manage article writers. He also said that he gets lot's of organic traffic from yahoo and bing and none from google and he is getting rich. It looks like google users will change from Rich to Rag by spending so much time and money on their site by optimizing it for Google and by spending it on Adwords. And those whom never care about Google is the one who is REALLY making money.
Google is of no use if there's no websites on WWW. And then if there is webmasters and none of them wants google, the market share will automatically shift to other search engines such like bing.
With that money they have, I don't think they will disappear anytime soon. But the name Google will definitely start to fade not in 5 but within the next couple of years for sure.
As like Altavista, myspace and hundreds of other popular sites they stay on top just for a few years, Like a popsicle - They look cool for some time but eventually start to melt after some time.
They're making every webmaster to frown upon them for making them slavery to their stupid algorithms which picks only content rich sites.
They want you to be a poet by wanting the quotes on your article and then they want your article to look like it's written by Shakespeare because their bots like human friendly articles.
They want you to use Bulletin points and then they want you to spend 1/8 of your day to write a single article because that's what they think is useful to visitors.
My neighbor runs an offline business and owns a website to sell some stuff online. He said Adcenter traffic is cheap and converts a lot better than Adwords for his business. He doesn't have enough time to write articles on his own nor to manage article writers. He also said that he gets lot's of organic traffic from yahoo and bing and none from google and he is getting rich. It looks like google users will change from Rich to Rag by spending so much time and money on their site by optimizing it for Google and by spending it on Adwords. And those whom never care about Google is the one who is REALLY making money.
Google is of no use if there's no websites on WWW. And then if there is webmasters and none of them wants google, the market share will automatically shift to other search engines such like bing.
With that money they have, I don't think they will disappear anytime soon. But the name Google will definitely start to fade not in 5 but within the next couple of years for sure.
As like Altavista, myspace and hundreds of other popular sites they stay on top just for a few years, Like a popsicle - They look cool for some time but eventually start to melt after some time.
MaxTucker
BANNED
- Aug 22, 2010
- 423
- 334
Another one of these threads? How does some rubbish 'the sky is falling' article about Google have anything to do with Blackhat SEO? Especially since this is due to happen in half a decade....
It is sad how misinformed you are and how you are willing to swallow any anti-google drivel out there. Learn some basic economics before reposting weak economic news.
It is sad how misinformed you are and how you are willing to swallow any anti-google drivel out there. Learn some basic economics before reposting weak economic news.
I really doubt that OP : http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/15/breaking-google-buys-motorola-for-12-5-billion/
MaxTucker
BANNED
- Aug 22, 2010
- 423
- 334
Did you even take a look at who wrote this news report?
It is that dumb ass, ditzy, blonde sorry excuse for a reporter called Cadie Thompson. Cadie is not an economist, she is a tech blogger. She does not report news, she reports rumor. Here is another brilliant piece by Cadie.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/47674474/Facebook_Will_Disappear_in_5_to_8_Years_Analyst
Oh wait, it is almost exactly the same article posted four months ago but that time it was about Facebook. Maybe she has a template?
What is even worse is that she quotes Eric Jackson, another tech reporter. I am sure he doesn't have an agenda right? Well..... almost every article he writes about Apple is positive, he thinks they will buy Twitter soon and use it to destroy Facebook. Yet, almost every Google and Facebook article he writes is negative. Not exactly an unbiased opinion then?
Well none of this matters to you does it? As long as it's anti-Google you are ready to open wide and swallow.
It is that dumb ass, ditzy, blonde sorry excuse for a reporter called Cadie Thompson. Cadie is not an economist, she is a tech blogger. She does not report news, she reports rumor. Here is another brilliant piece by Cadie.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/47674474/Facebook_Will_Disappear_in_5_to_8_Years_Analyst
Oh wait, it is almost exactly the same article posted four months ago but that time it was about Facebook. Maybe she has a template?
What is even worse is that she quotes Eric Jackson, another tech reporter. I am sure he doesn't have an agenda right? Well..... almost every article he writes about Apple is positive, he thinks they will buy Twitter soon and use it to destroy Facebook. Yet, almost every Google and Facebook article he writes is negative. Not exactly an unbiased opinion then?
Well none of this matters to you does it? As long as it's anti-Google you are ready to open wide and swallow.
Last edited:
manny521
Supreme Member
- Sep 15, 2011
- 1,449
- 370
dude, i was just re-posting an article to generate a conversation...i push your buttons too easily...
this thread was just for you! i knew this would get your blood boiling...
ibmethatswhoib
Elite Member
- Feb 17, 2011
- 1,567
- 1,171
He does seem to suck-off Google a lot, I don't understand how some people don't see how evil they really are. How bad they are for small business and webmasters as a whole.
manny521
Supreme Member
- Sep 15, 2011
- 1,449
- 370
Did you even take a look at who wrote this news report?
It is that dumb ass, ditzy, blonde sorry excuse for a reporter called Cadie Thompson. Cadie is not an economist, she is a tech blogger. She does not report news, she reports rumor. Here is another brilliant piece by Cadie.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/47674474/Facebook_Will_Disappear_in_5_to_8_Years_Analyst
Oh wait, it is almost exactly the same article posted four months ago but that time it was about Facebook. Maybe she has a template?
What is even worse is that she quotes Eric Jackson, another tech reporter. I am sure he doesn't have an agenda right? Well..... almost every article he writes about Apple is positive, he thinks they will buy Twitter soon and use it to destroy Facebook. Yet, almost every Google and Facebook article he writes is negative. Not exactly an unbiased opinion then?
Well none of this matters to you does it? As long as it's anti-Google you are ready to open wide and swallow.
ah man...did you really put this much effort into this post...really?...
i saw the article and i actually thought of you and what you would say, i couldn't resist posting this thread...i knew that you couldn't resist saying something...
MaxTucker
BANNED
- Aug 22, 2010
- 423
- 334
I think you are misinterpreting my tone, you seem to think I am angry? I am not angry. I find this fun actually.
Effort? Not really, my business is economics. I know who Cadie and Eric are, there was no effort. I remember her article on Facebook, it is the most read article of her career. I know Erick Jackson because he is bullish on Apple stock and I am bearish (successfully).
I am touched you thought of me though.
Last edited:
GetDOWNnandDIRTY
Newbie
- Oct 9, 2012
- 25
- 16
Well am glad he did that work for the rest of us. Why would we believe an article done by someone who is completely bias and apple pro, and only writes negative posts about google and facebook.
Doesn't it make sense to you to read an article from a non-bias person, if not then what is the point.
manny521
Supreme Member
- Sep 15, 2011
- 1,449
- 370
You know it!
MaxTucker
BANNED
- Aug 22, 2010
- 423
- 334
I see how Google causes a lot of problems. I just do not think they will collapse in five years. I am not defending Google, far from it. I am just asking that this forum concentrate on fact rather that baseless rumor.
The OP clogs up the forum with articles that have little to do with actual, current blackhat SEO. I am asking that we concentrate on the business at hand, BHSEO.
Anyway my posting here wont change a thing. So I will just take a step back and let you guys get on with it. Enjoy wasting time on another pointless thread
Last edited:
ibmethatswhoib
Elite Member
- Feb 17, 2011
- 1,567
- 1,171