GSA Search Engine Ranker - Extremely Powerful Linkbuilding Software (Free 5 Day Trial)

[s4nt0s]

Just bought the software, so far its great! Only thing I can not figure out is when I am creating different tiers. I create 1-3 just fine, but when I try and create a 4th tier, it say "Tier project- broken, no main project available". What is this and how do I fix it? Thanks

The tiering works fine. Just rename the tier. I put tier 4 in between the brackets and it worked fine. Can't believe I screwed that up and missed it.

09:25:05: [ ] 000/000 [Page END] results on Gigablast for ...
09:25:06: [ ] 000/002 [Page 002] results on SearchHippo for ...
09:25:09: [ ] 000/000 [Page END] results on AOL for ...
09:25:11: [ ] 000/000 [Page END] results on HotBot for ...
09:25:11: [ ] 000/000 [Page END] results on blekko for ...
09:25:11: [ ] 000/000 [Page END] results on Omgili for ...


Toooo much [Page END], I can't post all. OMG！How to fix it?

What are you trying to fix? Let the software run for a bit. Is it not finding any target sites?

 

[quakecat]

I changed the old keywords to hundreds of new keywords, but often get nothing target sites([Page END]). Maybe I should change the search engine or keywords

 

[rosepleasure]

Never heard of that happening and not sure how it could happen. Are you sure its changing emails?

Hi s4nt0s, yes. I just saw it yesterday after update to 4.44 because I have seen that some project had like 600 more links show on "submitted" and after I set it to run verify for 2 days, 600 were gone and not even 1 verified link found. So, I check and noticed that the email on "Email verification tab" has changed to the email belong to other project. I am sure about my email setup because I already got some verified links from the first day of running this project. This possibly happen when I update.

 

[antichrist]

I just renamed the tier completely and it works now! Thank you!

 

[antichrist]

I am getting a ton of "download failed" and verification fails. What does this mean and how do I fix it??

 

[Ozzmannor]

I'm pretty sure if you have searched this thread for "download failed" you get many responses with the answer: BAD PROXIES!

 

[s4nt0s]

We can now submit articles to wiki's hahaha. Also, new engines provided by Ozz.

4.46 - new: forum engine "YaBB" added (uses the new option as well to post new topics on forum)
- new: engine slideshare.net by Ozz added (Document Sharing but can only create profiles for now)
- new: MediaWiki and MoinMoin will create Articles now if the below option is checked
- new: option "Put link to places where it is clearly seen as SPAM (e.g. forum posts)."
- fix: minor bug with Target URL Import
- fix: layout in project edit was left-to-right for Chinese (sorry)
- fix: bugs in engines

 

[antichrist]

Ya, is there anyway I can tweek the settings to get less download failed? What about the verification fails? I am using gmail.

 

[Ozzmannor]

verification failed are normal to some point as not all submissions get verificate instantly (if ever). to get less download failed you have to use private proxies.

 

[dowser]

Can someone explain this? It's not very clear...

- new: MediaWiki and MoinMoin will create Articles now if the below option is checked
- new: option "Put link to places where it is clearly seen as SPAM (e.g. forum posts)."

 

[Ozzmannor]

if you check this option it will create not only profiles but articles on wiki sites as well as forum posts if you have the accordingly engines (mediawiki, Yabb, ect.) selected.

 

[dowser]

But I'm mostly curious about this section: "places where it is clearly seen as SPAM"

 

[Lee G]

I miss read the initial update notes. I was looking under the article box for a tick box
Reading the above, if you go to the options screen on each project, there is a tick box there
With the software designed to build spam links to gain rankings, its a bit strange that its labeled in such a way
I know people have been asking for articles to be posted to wikis for a long time and up until now, the only way was to put an article in the about me box
Next he might give in and add the option for multiple email addresses

 

[DutchTrafficService]

- new: MediaWiki and MoinMoin will create Articles now if the below option is checked
- new: option "Put link to places where it is clearly seen as SPAM (e.g. forum posts)."

Why is this option added and then disabled by default? (even more silly, why is this option added at all...) This changes the way people's current projects behave, which is incredibly annoying especially if you would not have read the update log, you simply would have stopped building links to these platforms, please don't do that...

 

[Ozzmannor]

Why is this option added and then disabled by default? (even more silly, why is this option added at all...) This changes the way people's current projects behave, which is incredibly annoying especially if you would not have read the update log, you simply would have stopped building links to these platforms, please don't do that...

Because Sven thinks that profile links only lasting longer than if you post an article or forum post. Be happy that he give you the opportunity to do it as you wish.
On a side note: Why are you always be so negative about SER? I've never seen something positive about this software from you. Just wondering....

 

[DutchTrafficService]

Because Sven thinks that profile links only lasting longer than if you post an article or forum post. Be happy that he give you the opportunity to do it as you wish.
On a side note: Why are you always be so negative about SER? I've never seen something positive about this software from you. Just wondering....

Then add the option and tick it enabled by default, changing the way ALL current projects work is not a good way of dealing with this.

I am negative because it can be so much better than it is/was, it is better now yes, but still not exactly what it can be, it is catering to much to beginners with no idea what they are doing, and unfortunately Sven likes to actually add all the (bloatware) requests these people make, and these lil changes are annoying as hell, it just does not make sense (speaking as a coder myself) to implement things that change all old running projects.

And no you should not even see it as negative, moreso dissapointed, if gsa was anywhere near xrumer's speed, i'd swap all my licenses immediately and be happy to pay 500 - 1k per license as well without thinking twice, but it's just absolutely no match as of yet, unfortunately.

+ the fact that for me personally, i use my own software that poops out ready-to-go gsa project files + content + linkslists, because of this weird change i'll have to update it again, which would not have been needed at all if options were just added that did not affect all old projects.

 

[s4nt0s]

I didn't think that new option changed anything with your old projects? I thought if you checked the option "put link to places to where it is clearly seen as SPAM" then it would have the wiki's post articles and forum's change a bit. So by default your projects are the same. If you wanted to turn it on then you would have to change your project settings. Isn't that it?

 

[DutchTrafficService]

I didn't think that new option changed anything with your old projects? I thought if you checked the option "put link to places to where it is clearly seen as SPAM" then it would have the wiki's post articles and forum's change a bit. So by default your projects are the same. If you wanted to turn it on then you would have to change your project settings. Isn't that it?

Not sure, it's not the way i read it.
If that is indeed the case, it's not a problem ofc.

 

[wezzy]

i use my own software that poops out ready-to-go gsa project files + content + linkslists ...

The way you said this made my LOL so f*cking hard xD

 

[Ozzmannor]

I am negative because it can be so much better than it is/was, it is better now yes, but still not exactly what it can be, it is catering to much to beginners with no idea what they are doing, and unfortunately Sven likes to actually add all the (bloatware) requests these people make, and these lil changes are annoying as hell, it just does not make sense (speaking as a coder myself) to implement things that change all old running projects.

I have a solution for you: Do not update.

And no you should not even see it as negative, moreso dissapointed, if gsa was anywhere near xrumer's speed, i'd swap all my licenses immediately and be happy to pay 500 - 1k per license as well without thinking twice, but it's just absolutely no match as of yet, unfortunately.

Why do you believe it is a competitor to xrumer? Lower your expectations please. Your rants looks silly to me when you compare xrumer to SER when SER is 6 times cheaper without monthly fees.