NOTE: Make sure you don't have any forum sites, image comment sites or guestbook sites ticked for this first tier as they will give you major penalties.
Ye I'm wondering about that too - what does it do with those? I don't have GSA to try so maybe it's obvious what it does, but for now I'm mystified!And i didnt understand the 100k part, you want us to use the 100k keywords to be used for Tier 4? could you please clarify!
Not at all. WAC Creates extremely well created articles that are readable & unique + have photo's and video's in them.
Ye I'm wondering about that too - what does it do with those? I don't have GSA to try so maybe it's obvious what it does, but for now I'm mystified!
wait, you're doing it wrong, 1 day is only 1440 minutes1444 minutes(1 day)
I also forgot to include that for indexing the links I use Lindexed(all verified url's get sent there automatically thru GSA' API) and GSA SEO indexer.
Is there any reason why you choose WAC over Kontent Machine? I read a very similar strategy from someone over at Traffic Planet forum and they used Kontent Machine instead so I wasn't sure if there was a big difference or if they work basically the same.
The OP can correct me if I'm wrong...
The keywords are used in the footprint to scrape directories, blogs or whatever platform you are using in SER to build links. Having so many means SER will not have a difficult time finding places to post at.
Why would you need to get links indexed? By merely pointing backlink to backlink they will get indexed auto.
YesI can confirm that this work.
We run very similar setup for our clients.
There is big price difference. Kontent Machine is 37$ per month that's like 444$/year and WAC is only 42$/year. Honestly I don't think Kontent Machine is powerful enough to compesate asking price tag. For that monthly price you better pay some PRO to create you super huge nested article (20 articles in one) and you have millions of variations which is atleast readable...