cheap alternative to adobe after effect?

mohitjmehta

BANNED
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
1,014
Reaction score
800
well i know there are tons of crack floating around ,BUT i cant use cracks (In short,legit copy is must)
AE cost about $1K and i dont have that much use so i dont want to invest that much money.
is there any alternative of it ?
 
depends on what you are trying to do with it. After Effects is a swiss army knife app, it can do a lot of stuff. If I know how you planned on using it I may be able to help.

Adobe also has a cloud service where you can use After Effects for $50/month as well.
 
Last edited:
depends on what you are trying to do with it. After Effects is a swiss army knife app, it can do a lot of stuff. If I know how you planned on using it I may be able to help.

Adobe also has a cloud service where you can use After Effects for $50/month as well.

i am just looking for fire and flash effects on images,have no intension to edit videos at all.
 
i am just looking for fire and flash effects on images,have no intension to edit videos at all.

The software you need is called:

Jahshaka -is a free VFX tool that does the same thing as after effect. Its open source and can be confusing to install if you aren't programming savvy.

youtube. com/user/ FreeWareFrolics

he actually uses fire in the example
 
Vegas can be used to create all kinds of effects. Where AE has the edge is comets, fireballs, shatters, canned stuff like that, that are hardly ever used, except for noobs, because everyone knows it's coming from AE.


Having said that, Vegas does not offer anything prebuilt except the usual cheesy transitions. So you will have to play with the tools and let your creativity flow.


The reason AE costs so much is that Adobe has to license all these effects from various vendors. Adobe doesn't actually make anything themselves, they aggregate other people's stuff. Like "Flash" VP6 .flv was licensed from a small little known company.


So don't be fooled by the high price, that it's "all that".


As an example of the two styles of the software, Vegas has a fractal generator that can be used to make clouds, lightning bolts, and whatever else you want to do. It doesn't specifically have a lightning effect plugin like AE.


Another example is a gradient fade. Vegas lets you bring your own gradient and will animate the fade from dark to light so the possibilities are limitless.


The Vegas toolset has things like Cookie Cutter, that simply uses standard circles, squares, rectangles, etc. as positive or negative masks. Again, unlimited possibilities.


In the video I posted there is a face of a jester winking. That jester is a photograph from the wall of a building in Venice, CA. I took the still into a graphics program and using a deform tool I created a still image sequence (animation), then brought it into Vegas as a video event. There is no "Make a face wink" plugin, therefore it is a unique effect that people haven't seen too much.


The main difference in Pro vs. MS is compositing tools and bezier masking. Vegas Pro supports all the major compositing operators. Again, these raw tools are limitled only by your imagination.


I better get off my soapbox, PDR's gonna hammer me here anytime soon
 
You can get the whole Adobe suite for $30/month of them if that's easier?
 
Or you can look for an older version of After Effects. It mustn't always be CS6, even CS4 or lower (of course this depends on your needs) could be enough.
 
Vegas can be used to create all kinds of effects. Where AE has the edge is comets, fireballs, shatters, canned stuff like that, that are hardly ever used, except for noobs, because everyone knows it's coming from AE.


Having said that, Vegas does not offer anything prebuilt except the usual cheesy transitions. So you will have to play with the tools and let your creativity flow.


The reason AE costs so much is that Adobe has to license all these effects from various vendors. Adobe doesn't actually make anything themselves, they aggregate other people's stuff. Like "Flash" VP6 .flv was licensed from a small little known company.


So don't be fooled by the high price, that it's "all that".


As an example of the two styles of the software, Vegas has a fractal generator that can be used to make clouds, lightning bolts, and whatever else you want to do. It doesn't specifically have a lightning effect plugin like AE.


Another example is a gradient fade. Vegas lets you bring your own gradient and will animate the fade from dark to light so the possibilities are limitless.


The Vegas toolset has things like Cookie Cutter, that simply uses standard circles, squares, rectangles, etc. as positive or negative masks. Again, unlimited possibilities.


In the video I posted there is a face of a jester winking. That jester is a photograph from the wall of a building in Venice, CA. I took the still into a graphics program and using a deform tool I created a still image sequence (animation), then brought it into Vegas as a video event. There is no "Make a face wink" plugin, therefore it is a unique effect that people haven't seen too much.


The main difference in Pro vs. MS is compositing tools and bezier masking. Vegas Pro supports all the major compositing operators. Again, these raw tools are limitled only by your imagination.


I better get off my soapbox, PDR's gonna hammer me here anytime soon

Your post makes me laugh. I clearly got that you are one of those VEGAS guys. It amuses me when I hear people rant like that. The same with Canon and Nikkon advocates.

In the end, if you know what you are doing...It does not matter what tool you are using.

I personally don't like the overall feel of Vegas, but that is just me.
 
Back
Top