Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[stinkingrich]

i was asking about integration with lindexed but found my answer on previous posts. I am buying this software today itself. Bye Bye extremwikiposter and its arrogant unhelpful developer.

 

[clyde]

for example 1000 wiki livelinks takes howmany hours? via 100mbit vps.

It's very fast, should take less than an hour.

i was asking about integration with lindexed but found my answer on previous posts. I am buying this software today itself. Bye Bye extremwikiposter and its arrogant unhelpful developer.

Thank you!

We have more upgrades coming soon this week so stay tuned!

@everybody else, thanks for the new orders!

 

[messageinabox]

Purchase wiki bomber based on this thread's testimonial

I noticed that a lot of sites are broken with I created an account only 5532/9578 success or only 58% success rate. I read that this might be because of my AV (I'm using Symantec Endpoint), can you give me directions where I can find the folder to add wiki bomber to the ignore list? Tried Programsx86 Folder and its not there.

The autoscrape is OK, I suggest to add capability to scrape not just from ezinearticles. Also, is it possible to add images to a wiki post? If yes, how? Thanks!

Btw, since this new update it appears that navigating from tab to tab appears to hang or it doesn't take you there when you click the tab. I'm doing this while creating accounts. When I used it earlier, I was able to navigate the tabs easily even if a task is currently running.

Great software, overall!

 

[clyde]

Purchase wiki bomber based on this thread's testimonial

I noticed that a lot of sites are broken with I created an account only 5532/9578 success or only 58% success rate. I read that this might be because of my AV (I'm using Symantec Endpoint), can you give me directions where I can find the folder to add wiki bomber to the ignore list? Tried Programsx86 Folder and its not there.

The autoscrape is OK, I suggest to add capability to scrape not just from ezinearticles. Also, is it possible to add images to a wiki post? If yes, how? Thanks!

Btw, since this new update it appears that navigating from tab to tab appears to hang or it doesn't take you there when you click the tab. I'm doing this while creating accounts. When I used it earlier, I was able to navigate the tabs easily even if a task is currently running.

Great software, overall!

Hi,

Thanks for the review.

The folder path is very long so I suggest that you just disable your antivirus while running WB, don't worry, we don't download anything from the sites we post to. To improve success rate, please lower the threads count to 30-40 and set auto-retry to 2. Using proxies will also help with your success rate.

As for it appears to hang, that's due to you having low RAM or doing too many threads at once. We didn't change much since the last update, only added new features so it shouldn't affect the speed of the software.

Thanks again for the review!

 

[clyde]

UPDATE: Version 1.0.5.3 Released!

- Ability to auto-recognize CMS for custom list added! You no longer have to import them separately!

 

[bk071]

- Ability to auto-recognize CMS for custom list added! You no longer have to import them separately!

Thanks man.. this one is big!
I was going to send you an email requesting this very feature... glad you've already got that covered now

Keep up the good work.

 

[lesid1]

Clyde. Hey just wondering if it really is not possible to just run all the submissions one after the other like we used to be able to? I would rather just load up a bunch of submissions and walk away and have them submit one right after the other without having to either a. manually start them, or b. have to figure what time to schedule each one. Am I missing something here? Is it possible to maybe have a "Submit Now" option on the scheduler, and every task you load will just be put in order and fired off one after the other like it used to?

Cheers mate... looking forward to hearing from you.

 

[lesid1]

Also, every time you go to schedule a new task, the scheduled time just remains the same. Perhaps this could auto-update based on the system time, or user defined interval? This would be very helpful for those of us scheduling/running lots of tasks every day. Thanks again.

 

[clyde]

Thanks man.. this one is big!
I was going to send you an email requesting this very feature... glad you've already got that covered now

Keep up the good work.

Thank you!

Hope we'll make more sales because of this! We're now officially the BEST wiki poster on the market.

Clyde. Hey just wondering if it really is not possible to just run all the submissions one after the other like we used to be able to? I would rather just load up a bunch of submissions and walk away and have them submit one right after the other without having to either a. manually start them, or b. have to figure what time to schedule each one. Am I missing something here? Is it possible to maybe have a "Submit Now" option on the scheduler, and every task you load will just be put in order and fired off one after the other like it used to?

Cheers mate... looking forward to hearing from you.

Hi,

You can still run a submission immediately.

If you have a submission currently running, your second submission will start immediately after the first one is finished.

This is still how it works now and you can just schedule campaigns, and the software will take care of everything.

However, I do understand what the confusion is about, we'll get this fixed by adding a checkbox called "Start Immediately".

Also, every time you go to schedule a new task, the scheduled time just remains the same. Perhaps this could auto-update based on the system time, or user defined interval? This would be very helpful for those of us scheduling/running lots of tasks every day. Thanks again.

Hm.. Why would you want the scheduled time to change automatically?

Why not just set it to the correct time in the first place?

Anyway, I think having a "Start Immediately" checkbox will clear everything up for you.

@everybody else, thanks for all the new orders!

 

[lesid1]

"Anyway, I think having a "Start Immediately" checkbox will clear everything up for you."

Perfect... Thanks Clyde you just saved me hours of time rewriting my scripts

You guys rock!

 

[clyde]

"Anyway, I think having a "Start Immediately" checkbox will clear everything up for you."

Perfect... Thanks Clyde you just saved me hours of time rewriting my scripts

You guys rock!

Thank you! Don't forget to check out our other software launching soon!

Hint: It's called SB Bomber.

@everybody else, thanks for all the recent orders!
We're working hard to improve WB and your support means a lot!

 

[lesid1]

Thank you! Don't forget to check out our other software launching soon!

Hint: It's called SB Bomber.

@everybody else, thanks for all the recent orders!
We're working hard to improve WB and your support means a lot!

Hi Clyde... Me again.

Listen, upon closer scrutiny, the "schedule immediately" checkbox doesn't work at all like how the submitter used to. What I mean is that say you start a task and it's 12:00 am with the checkbox checked. The task start right away. Then say you immediately go to load a new task, again with the checkbox checked, unless the first submission finishes by the time you load up your next task, your next task will NOT RUN. You have to manually launch it. So if you're loading a bunch of tasks in one go, you either have to manually fire them off, or you have to figure out aprox how much time each submission takes, and manually set up each submission time. That's far less user friendly then the old submission mechanics where each task auto fired after the other. Is there any chance we could have that functionality back? I think it's intuitive that if you have the "schedule immediately" checkbox checked, and there is another submission currently running, then the one you are loading should auto fire after the 1st is complete.

What do you think?

Cheers,

 

[clyde]

Hi Clyde... Me again.

Listen, upon closer scrutiny, the "schedule immediately" checkbox doesn't work at all like how the submitter used to. What I mean is that say you start a task and it's 12:00 am with the checkbox checked. The task start right away. Then say you immediately go to load a new task, again with the checkbox checked, unless the first submission finishes by the time you load up your next task, your next task will NOT RUN. You have to manually launch it. So if you're loading a bunch of tasks in one go, you either have to manually fire them off, or you have to figure out aprox how much time each submission takes, and manually set up each submission time. That's far less user friendly then the old submission mechanics where each task auto fired after the other. Is there any chance we could have that functionality back? I think it's intuitive that if you have the "schedule immediately" checkbox checked, and there is another submission currently running, then the one you are loading should auto fire after the 1st is complete.

What do you think?

Cheers,

Ah! You're right. It's a bug.

Will get this fixed first thing in the morning.

 

[lesid1]

Ah! You're right. It's a bug.

Will get this fixed first thing in the morning.

Customer Support doesn't get any better then that. Repped and thanked! Thank you.

 

[messageinabox]

It appears that the links are not submitted to Lindexed.
It looks like it will add a campaign but the links are not added to the Lindexed campaign.

In my Lindexed campaign:
This campaign has 0 urls where 0 were crawled at least once with crawling rate of 0 % ..."WB Bomber:8/17/2012 8:42:33 PM"

But it has submitted to 3569 sites, used private proxy, built in list.

Can you check this? Thanks!

 

[lesid1]

Ah! You're right. It's a bug.

Will get this fixed first thing in the morning.

Clyde, I'm sorry to say that even after the updates the submitter still doesn't work as it used to or should. If you schedule a whole bunch of tasks with the "submit now" check box checked, and the task that is running isn't finished, the next scheduled task does not autofire........... which is a real pain. Anyway to please please get this sorted. I should mention that I had all my tasks loaded on 08/17, but tried running them on 08/18 so that could be an issue. I'll set up and run together on the same day tomorrow and will report if that's the issue..

Thanks again.

 

[cash202]

I've bought and tested this thing. Result is 4000+ live links in a few hours on a single run almost at a push of a button. Amazing. Reminds me of AutoPligg is times of its glory.

 

[MrBeastsOnToast]

can i ask what format do the private proxies need to be in for the import from .txt file?

Thanks

 

[clyde]

It appears that the links are not submitted to Lindexed.
It looks like it will add a campaign but the links are not added to the Lindexed campaign.

In my Lindexed campaign:
This campaign has 0 urls where 0 were crawled at least once with crawling rate of 0 % ..."WB Bomber:8/17/2012 8:42:33 PM"

But it has submitted to 3569 sites, used private proxy, built in list.

Can you check this? Thanks!

Will get this fixed over the weekend, thanks for reporting it!

Clyde, I'm sorry to say that even after the updates the submitter still doesn't work as it used to or should. If you schedule a whole bunch of tasks with the "submit now" check box checked, and the task that is running isn't finished, the next scheduled task does not autofire........... which is a real pain. Anyway to please please get this sorted. I should mention that I had all my tasks loaded on 08/17, but tried running them on 08/18 so that could be an issue. I'll set up and run together on the same day tomorrow and will report if that's the issue..

Thanks again.

That has always been the way it works, your next campaign will only start after your current running campaign is done.

Is that what the problem was?

I've bought and tested this thing. Result is 4000+ live links in a few hours on a single run almost at a push of a button. Amazing. Reminds me of AutoPligg is times of its glory.

Thanks for the review! Awesome!

can i ask what format do the private proxies need to be in for the import from .txt file?

Thanks

Sure.

IPORT:USERNAMEASSWORD

One proxy per line in a .txt file.

 

[Deleted member 36594]

Fucking hell! I'm hitting my head against the fucking wall!

WHY? Because Wiki Bomber supports so many platforms with awesome features at such a low price ($67)!
Unlike Extreme Wiki Poster which cost $247 and it is fucking buggy, fucking slow, supports only a few fucking platforms, fucking laggy, and Extreme and his developers are arrogant slow-replying bastards.
Just compare Clyde's salespage and Extreme's salespage. Clyde is full of happy customers and positive reviews; Extreme's salespage has complaints and even the mods have to lock his salesthread.

Clyde. You got a sale.