How to spin an article to 70+% uniqe?

[liranbo]

Hi,

I need some help about this issue, I'm having some hard time spinning articles to 70%+ unique level.

I'm doing manual spinning, first I rewrite each sentence 3 times which is only good enough to get about 50% unique level, so I start word spinning which takes forever and doesn't really change the unique % level much.

What am I doing wrong? and what is the best way to do this? my goal is to have about 20-30 unique articles or if possible up to 50.

p.s I'm using spinChimp pro (used spinnerCheif free version before).

Thanks,

Liran

 

[thetvnun]

50% is considered pretty good. i was obsessed with the unique % too, then i decided to check some original articles i wrote that i had never published and found them to be only 80% unique (online); but if you must get a higher % you have to spin the paragraph. it just occurred to me that you might not have set the "to the nth" option.

 

[SnowWar]

For spinning articles you always should avoid using the machines and bots that most of the people uses.
To get better results you should do that manually by your hand.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

How many synonyms per word on average do you add? Even just 1 should give you pretty high uniqueness. Aim for 2, but this sometimes can make the article less readable.

 

[doorenour]

Spin on multiple levels. You should consider not only word spinning, but also at least sentence spinning (and paragraph spinning is much recommended.) If you want there is a lot of information how to spin properly here, on BHW. Those topics are my favourite:
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/399416-constructing-master-tier-2-articles-ubertoolz.html
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/444418-wip-calculating-number-times-spun-article-can-realistically-used.html
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/411372-guide-article-spinning.html
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/436738-how-unique-should-you-spin-your-articles-web-2-0s-now-penguin-update.html

 

[artificial_genius]

What are you using to calculate uniqueness? I've found that TBS's uniqueness calculator (which is what most people use) doesn't emphasis nested spinning nearly as much.

With that being said it shouldn't be that hard to get a 70% uniqueness just from synonym spinning and still have readability. If you add in nested spinning it should be even easier.

If you are using a good spinner to help you, it should only be taking you 5-6 minutes to get an article that is that unique (and perfectly readable).

 

[liranbo]

50% is considered pretty good. i was obsessed with the unique % too, then i decided to check some original articles i wrote that i had never published and found them to be only 80% unique (online); but if you must get a higher % you have to spin the paragraph. it just occurred to me that you might not have set the "to the nth" option.

How do u check unique level online? I might just try it as well.

For spinning articles you always should avoid using the machines and bots that most of the people uses.
To get better results you should do that manually by your hand.

This is exactly my point, I am doing it manually but not gaining anything since the unique level is stuck at around 50%..

How many synonyms per word on average do you add? Even just 1 should give you pretty high uniqueness. Aim for 2, but this sometimes can make the article less readable.

doing 2-4, sometimes I even spin half a sentence if I think of something quick, yet the unique level is at max 57%.

Spin on multiple levels. You should consider not only word spinning, but also at least sentence spinning (and paragraph spinning is much recommended.) If you want there is a lot of information how to spin properly here, on BHW. Those topics are my favourite:
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/399416-constructing-master-tier-2-articles-ubertoolz.html
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/444418-wip-calculating-number-times-spun-article-can-realistically-used.html
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/411372-guide-article-spinning.html
ww*.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/436738-how-unique-should-you-spin-your-articles-web-2-0s-now-penguin-update.html

Thanks for the info, I'll start reading!

 

[liranbo]

What are you using to calculate uniqueness? I've found that TBS's uniqueness calculator (which is what most people use) doesn't emphasis nested spinning nearly as much.

With that being said it shouldn't be that hard to get a 70% uniqueness just from synonym spinning and still have readability. If you add in nested spinning it should be even easier.

If you are using a good spinner to help you, it should only be taking you 5-6 minutes to get an article that is that unique (and perfectly readable).

Are u kidding? it takes me an hour+ just to get 50% unique, and so far I've used the free spinnerChief and SpinChimp (pro version) which I like even less.

 

[hatelovemisery]

Hey i know a super good free alternative to TBS, i've been using it. Its called articles rewrite assistant. Go look for it, easily above 80% uniqueness.

Cheers

 

[incognito876]

Hey i know a super good free alternative to TBS, i've been using it. Its called articles rewrite assistant. Go look for it, easily above 80% uniqueness.

Cheers

I just downloaded it and put a simple paragraph in it. The auto rewrite it gave me made no sense at all. It probably is 80 percent unique but it is gibberish.

OP: I use SpinChimp too. I rewrite each paragraph first using Dragon NaturallySpeaking- for some reason Dragon and SpinChimp work really well together - I hardly have to make any corrections. Then I manually spin at word level. This gets me around 60 to 75% uniqueness. It does take time but the result can be used many times over, and using Dragon cuts down the time quite a bit.

 

[cas77]

Hey i know a super good free alternative to TBS, i've been using it. Its called articles rewrite assistant. Go look for it, easily above 80% uniqueness.

Cheers

Pretty sure that's your s/w so sorry for the honest critic. I've tried it and like the poster above me said it spit out utter crap.

 

[freller]

These percentages are now out of date anyway.

Both Google and Bing Yahoo can spot and nullify the benefit of individual word synonyms - you have to fully rewrite sentences AND paragraphs. If you've fully rewritten whole sentences you have to be showing higher than 50% unique - if not then it's not a proper rewrite.

 

[Nicknash]

I agree , "50% is considered pretty good."

 

[Codythebest]

tough to have 70% uniqueness. If you can get 50%, that's already great. One spin with TBS will get you maybe 20%...
What you need is add several synonym by yourself time to time...

 

[FireTheWild]

Check out the veheme threads

 

[moonlighsunligh]

These percentages are now out of date anyway.

Both Google and Bing Yahoo can spot and nullify the benefit of individual word synonyms - you have to fully rewrite sentences AND paragraphs. If you've fully rewritten whole sentences you have to be showing higher than 50% unique - if not then it's not a proper rewrite.

They can spot just in case when a 1-2 words per sentence are replaced by their synonyms. If you change most words in a sentence, it will appear to be unique.

 

[liranbo]

Check out the veheme threads

I read both of his threads regarding the actual spinner softwares and the guide on how to spin, I'm trying to implement what he said there but still not reaching the 70%+ I wish for, stuck on around 57%..

 

[artificial_genius]

These percentages are now out of date anyway.

Both Google and Bing Yahoo can spot and nullify the benefit of individual word synonyms - you have to fully rewrite sentences AND paragraphs. If you've fully rewritten whole sentences you have to be showing higher than 50% unique - if not then it's not a proper rewrite.

Do you have any evidence pointing to this?

I agree with you that nested spinning/automated rewriting is far better than just spinning, but I don't know that Google has technology to be able to detect well spun synonym spinning.

 

[luck888]

Although I am using a different spinner and not spinChimp, there are a couple of suggestions that I can give to make it more unique:

Since you mentioned that you are making 3 sentence versions, make sure that although the idea of each sentence is there, try to refrain from using the same words over and over again.

If you use different words throughout your sentences, chances are, the synonyms selected when word spinning it will also be different.

The less similar synonyms there are, the more unique your content will be.

 

[freller]

Do you have any evidence pointing to this?

I agree with you that nested spinning/automated rewriting is far better than just spinning, but I don't know that Google has technology to be able to detect well spun synonym spinning.

I suggest looking up n-gram in Wikipedia and Representing n-gram language models for compact storage and fast retrieval in Google Patents and All Our N-gram Are Belong To You in Google Research - Bing have already stated that they index up to 7 word n-gram blocks and some of this stuff goes back six years so I have no doubt Google are ahead of that now.

Simple word spinning has not been sufficient for quite some time; to appear truly unique you have to alter both the sentence and paragraph structure. In other words, a complete rewrite. Using TBS or similar to spin words is just providing a fig leaf for little or no real benefit.