web 2.0 account creation mannual versus Autometic

[knockoutlocal]

Just to avoid footprints. If you can get 100 accounts in 100 different usernames on fiverr then go that route. With senuke, though, you can use it to post to all your properties on a schedule without having to log in to each one and post (which would be hard to do for 100 accounts). If you want to mass create web 2.0's and do a one-time post (spun) to all of them then you can find providers out there that do that (100 for $20.00).

 

[sam2012]

Dear All.
Thanks to tech me about the fingerprint issue, now i will never use same username to create different accounts.So after big suggestions from you, i again talk with the provider of this gig "100 web 2 accounts"
on fiverr.
They are agreed to create 100 web 2.0 accounts through 100 unique username in 10 Dollar.I already give them the order and hopefully they will provided it by tomorrow.
Let's see the result of tomorrow then we decide who will win manual or automatic.

 

[Expertpeon]

I prefer going with manually because i worked on bot as well as manually.The difference between both are in bot you can get some xyzabc as your blog domain and title but in manual we can use our keyword as blog url and keyword.Most of them today prefer manual not bot.

What kind of terrible bot are you using?
My bot dumps videos, picture embeds, changes the title of the blog, and uses subdomains that are related to my keywords.

Are you saying this Expertpeon ?

Yes, I've seen nothing but horrible bought links ranking fresh domains since penguin occurred. Usually on links.html pages or something similar or blogrolls.

 

[The SEO]

Web 2.0 creation is not so simple that it looks, because place links inside the content on web 2.0 and mostly links directly goes to your money site if there will be any problem during his creation or later then your website may be facing him. So this is most special and unique service after Penguin update. In my opinion, first try to make web 2.0 properties by yourself if not then give it to some professional who have great experience in making perfect and natural looking web 2.0 properties.

 

[kuzmanin]

Great tips here
10x for that info

 

[dennis727]

What kind of terrible bot are you using?
My bot dumps videos, picture embeds, changes the title of the blog, and uses subdomains that are related to my keywords.

Expertpeon,

If I may ask, are you using ZennoPoster? If so, did you get someone to create a template for you? OR did you use other custom made bots?

 

[wowhaxor]

If they're fivver gigs then I'd say they're certainly automatic. Nothing wrong with that, if you do it right, proper spintax etc. its exactly the same except for a lot less work but chances are that didn't happen. Can't really complain when you're trying to just drop $5 though man.

 

[sam2012]

But, is their any bot or software present which is create up to 100 web 2.0 accounts? i searched and found that maximum 35 web 2.0 site should be register properly through any kind of software.

 

[sam2012]

I already talk with the gig provider -"100 accounts on top 100 web 2 websites" on fiverr,they said they do it 100% mannually because their no such software which can create up to 100 web 2.0 accounts automatically.

 

[_Chip_]

Making such a bot is not impossible.

 

[sam2012]

Here is complete profile of this service provider including sample report:- onetwofive.me/create-web-2-0-websites

 

[sam2012]

Order delivered, view it from -- mediafire..../?vwn6ug5hlmnh246
After then, Kindly vote manual or autometic?
:shhh:

 

[makeitWORK!]

Expertpeon, are the bots you're using for the web 2.0's the one's you developed with ZP or did you purchase them elsewhere? If you bought them, please point me in the right direction .

 

[futurestic06]

Manual is always cool. You will get the result after a bit of late but the result will stay for a long time.
About Fiverr: I have used some of the gigs from them but never got any kind of benefit. May be just a little benefit by using their manual directory submission, Manual EDU link buildings etc. I jsut use them to get some cheap articles

 

[Scritty]

I already talk with the gig provider -"100 accounts on top 100 web 2 websites" on fiverr,they said they do it 100% mannually because their no such software which can create up to 100 web 2.0 accounts automatically.

Then they're talking out of their arse.

I'm taking this as a challenge. MINIMUM 100 WEB2 accounts (including as many of the big boys as possible) including content submission and embedded links. FULLY AUTOMATED. I'll stick a vid of me doing it on Youtube and you can check the lnks for yourself.

As for then making 100 manually for $4. I'd check the quality if I was you. I've seen some guys say "WEB2" when they mean the shittiest bookmark on a guest book style site and all/most of them are on the same IP and totally worthless.
It's basically a profile link on some platform you've never heard of that adds zero value to you.

Love to hear what you get for your cash.

Scritty

 

[mohnikinsiz]

Hi, i want to promote my travel site through web 2.0 platform.

Why aren't you honest and say "Hi I want to promote my fiverr gig"??

Doesn't anyone understand that the guy is only trying to promote his own fiverr gig? I hate shit like this where they just want attention. If you do it honest I don't mind but doing it this way is not going to get you a single sale.. Please ban the guy.

 

[SEO.9]

Why aren't you honest and say "Hi I want to promote my fiverr gig"??

Doesn't anyone understand that the guy is only trying to promote his own fiverr gig? I hate shit like this where they just want attention. If you do it honest I don't mind but doing it this way is not going to get you a single sale.. Please ban the guy.

how did you figure that out? : P

anyway, doing it manually is just a waste of time to me

yes, manual has a little bit more quality, but does this quality makes your link stronger? hell no!!

and with the time that you used to manually make just 1 link, you could have make tens or hundreds with automation software

its all come down to opportunity cost

 

[drvosjeca]

because their no such software which can create up to 100 web 2.0 accounts automatically.

buhahahahaaaaa...
If you are willing to bet i will show you there is I can do well over 100 web 2.0

 

[Scritty]

121 Accounts created.
81 full articles posted.

[URL]http://www.demondemon.com/2012/06/08/ultimate-demon-and-web2-0-definition/[/URL]

PROPER WEB2.0 sites (not the guestbook style crap you get from these cheap services)
This was first pass only and took less than 20 minutes. With a bit of fiddling and waiting for the account approval from those sites that have manual moderation of new sites or just slow email servers..it would have been quite a bit higher.

SUCK.... IT..... UP!

 

[Brikati]

121 Accounts created.
81 full articles posted.


PROPER WEB2.0 sites (not the guestbook style crap you get from these cheap services)
This was first pass only and took less than 20 minutes. With a bit of fiddling and waiting for the account approval from those sites that have manual moderation of new sites or just slow email servers..it would have been quite a bit higher.

SUCK.... IT..... UP!

As much as I'm a fan of UD. Many of their web 2.0s(scraped) don't stick. The link checker give a false sense of security as, it checks for the submission URL rather than your money site URL on the page.

Next time you do a web 2.0 blast manual check a few of the posts manually and you'll see the truth. IMO sometimes its best to get it done manually or to custom code a program that adds relevant pictures/videos to automate it.