Linklicious does a good job at what its supposed to do. It gets your links crawled and drips them out nicely. Any ranking drops would be unrelated to their service.
Exactly, paid users get their links crawled at 100% rate, which is exactly what we advertise. You guys still trying to track indexing are chasing shadows. Google NEVER gives you an accurate number and backlink checkers are unreliable. Google itself can't crawl the entire web, and you guys expect a 3rd party company, with nothing even close to resembling Googles finances or bandwidth to accurately do it? They have to not only crawl the web, they have to re-crawl the links they already have in their relatively small database. I know people who have used those tools and it shows them having 8000 "indexed links" one week, then only 2000 the next. What happened to those indexed backlinks? Did they disappear? Of course not, they just removed them from their database to make room for something. The point is...it isn't accurate, so don't use it as a measurement of success.
... It is more effective to track SERP rankings, not indexing.
What we are saying is you need to stop focusing on being indexed. Its irrelevant, it isn't cost effective, its not accurate and google doesn't even show you the whole picture. Its like trying to solve a math problem on a paper that has 20% of the numbers invisible.
Watch...
Solve this problem. 1 + _ + 27 x _ - _ + 2 = ?
^ If I don't give you all the numbers, how are you going to use the numbers I DO SHOW YOU, to solve anything or compute? The answer is, you can't really.
You need to focus on what matters, getting your links crawled, so that google adds them to its "crawled database", so they can start working for you. This is something you can know accurately, and indexing will be a natural consequence.
Focus on that and track your SERPS, that is what matters....not how many links you can get indexed. Make sense?
