ytnuke so cheap now

[illfounded21]

They do count.

Nice, thought so.

 

[tempguy123]

I beg to differ "YT Nuke was established about two years ago by Paul and Clayton in order to make the view buying process as simple as possible.

Within a few weeks of launch, our view method stopped working and we were forced to close down. Months later, with the help of SpK we were able to get our method working. With that being said, YT Nuke was well and running once again.

To show our appreciation to SpK for helping fix our method, we granted him full access in order for him to open up his own service."

I have read the thread, but what I mean is from my PERSONAL experience as well as collecting other people's experience, it seems like SpK and YTNuke use different methods. There is a difference in speeds, overdelivery, support and basically results. And Im sure there are more than 1 method that these people use, as you can see people on fiverr and other places selling below $1/k, but who knows?

 

[illfounded21]

I have read the thread, but what I mean is from my PERSONAL experience as well as collecting other people's experience, it seems like SpK and YTNuke use different methods. There is a difference in speeds, overdelivery, support and basically results. And Im sure there are more than 1 method that these people use, as you can see people on fiverr and other places selling below $1/k, but who knows?

Gut instinct says they DO use the same method. Especially as SpK was granted access to the inner workings of YTNuke..

 

[skittles]

I have read the thread, but what I mean is from my PERSONAL experience as well as collecting other people's experience, it seems like SpK and YTNuke use different methods. There is a difference in speeds, overdelivery, support and basically results. And Im sure there are more than 1 method that these people use, as you can see people on fiverr and other places selling below $1/k, but who knows?

Same method different servers... maybe :/

 

[illfounded21]

LOl just because they had a higher price before doesn't mean they are still cheap . The money they spend to get those views are dirt cheap to them so the price they offer those views for are still not cheap.

Yeah but you can take that point of view & stance for any business in the world...

Everyone will still sell at a profit.

 

[EmpireQuality]

here's the thing though. they are matching market price but only if you buy 950,000 views. Otherwise they are still charging more than everyone else.

and who exactly is "everyone else"? the only 3 legit sellers that i know of are VT, YTnuke, and JS. YTnuke is the cheapest out of these 3

 

[tempguy123]

Gut instinct says they DO use the same method. Especially as SpK was granted access to the inner workings of YTNuke..

He was only granted access for helping YTNuke and that was ages ago, don't you think there are more methods out there? And i agree with Skittles, maybe different servers but that wouldn't explain why YTNuke doesn't gain as much revenue from use as ViewTornado.

 

[YoutubeMarketing]

their price is cheap as they probably want to beat the competition!

 

[illfounded21]

their price is cheap as they probably want to beat the competition!

ignore me- wrong quote

 

[illfounded21]

He was only granted access for helping YTNuke and that was ages ago, don't you think there are more methods out there? And i agree with Skittles, maybe different servers but that wouldn't explain why YTNuke doesn't gain as much revenue from use as ViewTornado.

You don't know who has bigger revenue between the two.

 

[scriptox]

So with YTN i spoke to someone yesterday and they said $1 per slow view and $2 per fast view... although once you go over 100k views it drops to $1.8 per fast view

 

[tempguy123]

You don't know who has bigger revenue between the two.

This is from my own personal experience. You earn revenue from ViewTornado but you earn very little from YTNuke. Only way to not recieve revenue is if people aren't viewing adverts, only reason people aren't viewing adverts is because they are on mobile devices. Hence why I have been thinking that YTNuke uses mobile views.

 

[illfounded21]

This is from my own personal experience. You earn revenue from ViewTornado but you earn very little from YTNuke. Only way to not recieve revenue is if people aren't viewing adverts, only reason people aren't viewing adverts is because they are on mobile devices. Hence why I have been thinking that YTNuke uses mobile views.

Hmm interesting, but there must be so many variables it hard to gauge accurately what it really going on.

I doubt YT would chance their whole set-up & business plan to now be mobile views, I don't think they have ever been in the past. Still don't think they are now.

I think they can charge less due to economies of scale.

 

[killopus]

This is from my own personal experience. You earn revenue from ViewTornado but you earn very little from YTNuke. Only way to not recieve revenue is if people aren't viewing adverts, only reason people aren't viewing adverts is because they are on mobile devices. Hence why I have been thinking that YTNuke uses mobile views.

YTN and VT are literally the same service. YTN has already stated that VT has access to their backend for views.

 

[tempguy123]

YTN and VT are literally the same service. YTN has already stated that VT has access to their backend for views.

Firstly, its SpK NOT ViewTornado.
I must have said this like 20 times now. It is said that SpK helped with a problem in YTNuke and they let him into their "project". That in no way means ViewTornado and YTNuke use the same service, maybe there are other methods performed similary. I know this from PERSONAL experience.

 

[tempguy123]

Hmm interesting, but there must be so many variables it hard to gauge accurately what it really going on.

I doubt YT would chance their whole set-up & business plan to now be mobile views, I don't think they have ever been in the past. Still don't think they are now.

I think they can charge less due to economies of scale.

Sadly, I did not use YTNuke (I thought it was a scam back then lol) so i cannot confirm whether they used mobile views or not. However I suspect that could be using mobile views and redirecting the tracks as something like facebook views (social media) successfully. And its understandable for people to agree with current rules (but i think that would go offtopic).

 

[illfounded21]

Sadly, I did not use YTNuke (I thought it was a scam back then lol) so i cannot confirm whether they used mobile views or not. However I suspect that could be using mobile views and redirecting the tracks as something like facebook views (social media) successfully. And its understandable for people to agree with current rules (but i think that would go offtopic).

All my vids have always ranked well when using YTNuke, just like they have with VT. If it was just mobile I think they wouldn't rank as successfully.

 

[KillerHeck]

All my vids have always ranked well when using YTNuke, just like they have with VT. If it was just mobile I think they wouldn't rank as successfully.

It's all about faking the referral, you could use "mobile views" and make it look like it's from any other source (like facebook/twitter or even bhw

But $1 is a fair price, especially since more people are finding out the "trick" they used.

Also just to be clear, YTNuke & ViewTornado both use the same method to gain views. This is because both sites are (partially) owned by SpK!

 

[skittles]

It's all about faking the referral, you could use "mobile views" and make it look like it's from any other source (like facebook/twitter or even bhw

But $1 is a fair price, especially since more people are finding out the "trick" they used.

Also just to be clear, YTNuke & ViewTornado both use the same method to gain views. This is because both sites are (partially) owned by SpK!

Do mobile views actually count on AdSense?

 

[illfounded21]

It's all about faking the referral, you could use "mobile views" and make it look like it's from any other source (like facebook/twitter or even bhw

But $1 is a fair price, especially since more people are finding out the "trick" they used.

Also just to be clear, YTNuke & ViewTornado both use the same method to gain views. This is because both sites are (partially) owned by SpK!

I don't think either use the referral method to hide mobile views, they do hide the referral though.

SpK does not partially own YTNuke, he only has helped them in the past.