Done some blog commenting and wiki blasts to try and vary the anchor text. Also did some reweets.
Second Penguin Update (Refresh)
- Thread starter UpMyKilt
- Start date
Done some blog commenting and wiki blasts to try and vary the anchor text. Also did some reweets.
D
Deleted member 17472
Guest
Heavy Drastical changes i have seen in my all 35 websites , for which i am doing seo.
Nearly 5 websites get severely affected and now there are not in top 300. and Rest 30 websites are doing great and jumped to 1st page for all 10 keywords. and Now in top 1-10.
Nearly 5 websites get severely affected and now there are not in top 300. and Rest 30 websites are doing great and jumped to 1st page for all 10 keywords. and Now in top 1-10.
IamNRE
Elite Member
- Aug 18, 2010
- 7,164
- 10,718
It just shows that white hat is the future really...
If you are making web 2.0s and using cheaply spun content.... eventually google will make an update and make those web 2.0s lose ranking and maybe be de-indexed that will directly effect your main sites.
If you are making web 2.0s and using cheaply spun content.... eventually google will make an update and make those web 2.0s lose ranking and maybe be de-indexed that will directly effect your main sites.
thesameprice
Registered Member
- Sep 15, 2011
- 55
- 2
Same situation with one my site, all rank a lost, i have ten keywords on the first page, but not ,all of it out of ten pages,some is 50 pages,what should i do for recovery my rank
Ok, this is interesting and helpful. I doubt it was the retweets. I also doubt it was wiki blasts unless you overdid it and your link velocity looked unnatural, assuming Google indexed them all.
I think blog commenting blasts is the prime suspect here. But this is conjecture and we need more data.
Do you keep detailed notes for what you do for each site? Any differences that you can point to?
Possibly - more possibly cheaply spun content, but web 2.0's in of them self, I doubt causes the penalty. We've been doing a moderate amount of web 2.0's with varied anchor text to "money sites" and have seen no negative changes. There is nothing "black hat" (as in not white hat) by doing web 2.0's.
Well, what have you done in the past month? Perhaps experimenting with reversing that might be helpful. And we probably won't know for sure if that will work for another month, until next Penguin data refresh. But all the data we can get is helpful.
K
kiwi2004
Guest
B4 Penguin number 3 on first page
After penguin number 5 on 3rd page
Today number 2 on second page
After penguin number 5 on 3rd page
Today number 2 on second page
thesameprice
Registered Member
- Sep 15, 2011
- 55
- 2
I use Spun Cotent on web2.0, just checked , web2.0's rank still there ,but MN site's gone
spruitje
Junior Member
- Oct 8, 2011
- 138
- 64
I use Spun Cotent on web2.0, just checked , web2.0's rank still there ,but MN site's gone
If you feel that those 2.0's are to blame, why not simply delete them?
- May 10, 2011
- 6,104
- 534
I think new update is effective in less areas, no changes here
DutchTrafficService
Regular Member
- Aug 12, 2010
- 473
- 235
Really?
Mind explaining me why i rank autogenerated rubbish cloaked sites with xrumer only? They are blasted as soon as the domain is registered (im talking a few 100k live links straight the the domain here), yes i can reproduce that every day all day, as i have done to hundreds so far.
Webspam algo -1.
ronaldinho19
Junior Member
- Mar 3, 2009
- 115
- 12
What kind of links do you create with xrummer?