My SEO Blueprint (SENuke, AMR, BMD, Xrumer, Scrapebox)

[danny1]

I don't think the particular mechanics are all together clear.

If you're creating spun articles for the Web 2.0's, you simply spin the anchor text to include the 5 keywords.

 

[pianoman199]

What kind of keyword density to you put into your articles these days - on web 2.0 blogs and in AMR - with all this over-optimization penalty going on?

 

[cash202]

If you're creating spun articles for the Web 2.0's, you simply spin the anchor text to include the 5 keywords.

Yes, that's correct. Just make sure the keywords are synonyms, LSI or long tail versions of whatever
you'd like to rank for. Mixing "green apples", "read apples", "delicious apples", "granny smith apple" will
push you up for "apples".

 

[TheEditor]

Ok, this makes sense if the spun kw's are interchangeable. You can understand the consternation if they weren't.

Yes, that's correct. Just make sure the keywords are synonyms, LSI or long tail versions of whatever you'd like to rank for. Mixing "green apples", "read apples", "delicious apples", "granny smith apple" will push you up for "apples".

 

[supergoed]

Hello Cash202,

Thank you very much for your blueprint, you have no idea how thankful I am.

 

[pianoman199]

Have you figured out the safest keyword density of the actual article (not anchor text) - for a keyword made up of 2-3 words - say "dog training online"?

Would it be safe to use 2-3%? Or, is it now better to mention "dog training online" only a few times and then mix in lots of LSI keywords, and do the same for the anchor text of the various articles?

This really makes the blueprint confusing, since it was originally designed to be run for ONE keyword.

Yes, that's correct. Just make sure the keywords are synonyms, LSI or long tail versions of whatever
you'd like to rank for. Mixing "green apples", "read apples", "delicious apples", "granny smith apple" will
push you up for "apples".

 

[cash202]

Have you figured out the safest keyword density of the actual article (not anchor text) - for a keyword made up of 2-3 words - say "dog training online"?

Would it be safe to use 2-3%? Or, is it now better to mention "dog training online" only a few times and then mix in lots of LSI keywords, and do the same for the anchor text of the various articles?

This really makes the blueprint confusing, since it was originally designed to be run for ONE keyword.

Here is how I do it. I get an article written for the main keyword. Density is 3-4 times per 400 words which is less than 2% in fact. I replace each keyword in the article with {keyword|keyword variation one|keyword variation two}. For anchor links it looks like <a href="http://www.googlesucks.com">{keyword|keyword variation one|keyword variation two}</a>. Done.

That's why I say, variation of the keyword must be either long tails or synonyms for article to stay readable.

 

[othersk46]

Cash202, I don't know how much I learned from you. Your guide is the most details I've read.
Can you confirmed if this method is still work after Penguin update (with some modifications of course)?
If yes, which parts do we need to modify?
1. Diversify Anchor text (as you mentioned).
2. Diversify Tier 1 with forums, edu blogs...?
3. Stop Xrumer & Scrapebox blast?
4. .....

Also, can you explain this suggestion (step 9):

I use TWO links in each article, both pointing to a random page on a money site or to the root of the money site (I rotate URLs using spinner syntax).

Why don't we mainly (e.g 40%) link to the page targeted for the keyword (step 2).

Thank you very much. Indeed, you are inspiring me after the Penguin hit!

 

[arachnid]

A question for you guys & Cash202 regarding the Xrumer blast part - I did a cycle of this for a domain back in January and I outsourced the Xrumer step. Today, I went back to the list of verified links that the xrumer service provided and out of the random 10 or so links that I checked, all the profile links had been deleted by forum webmasters.

Do you guys have a good stick rate when it comes to your Xrumer links? If so, do you allocate the better success to the xrumer person who does your blasts / are they forum post links / profile links?

Thanks in advance.

 

[pkalico]

hey cash, how are you using bmd now? trying to get the hang of 6 and it doesnt seem to have the ability to randomly select 1 of your accounts to each url like it used to, unless Im missing something?

 

[retroslice]

hey cash, how are you using bmd now? trying to get the hang of 6 and it doesnt seem to have the ability to randomly select 1 of your accounts to each url like it used to, unless Im missing something?

No it doesn't. It took me about 2 weeks to figure this out as everyone seemed to be using an older version of BMD that did this and I couldn't figure out what I was doing wrong.

I just make about 10+ accounts, and if I want to bookmark 30 web 2.0s I'll make a task for each account, put in 5-6 of my web 2.0s and make it bookmark 2-3 random sites from the main list.

 

[pkalico]

No it doesn't. It took me about 2 weeks to figure this out as everyone seemed to be using an older version of BMD that did this and I couldn't figure out what I was doing wrong.

I just make about 10+ accounts, and if I want to bookmark 30 web 2.0s I'll make a task for each account, put in 5-6 of my web 2.0s and make it bookmark 2-3 random sites from the main list.

Thats what I thought. I did find this thread over in the BMD forum that kind of explained it in detail

http://forum.edwinsoft.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=241, in case anyone else wants to take a look.

 

[walandio]

wow.. awesome read.. it gathers half the total number of thanks you got..

you rock dude.. this will be helpful in doing SEO.. I guess this will work even an panda update..

 

[cash202]

Cash202, I don't know how much I learned from you. Your guide is the most details I've read.
Can you confirmed if this method is still work after Penguin update (with some modifications of course)?
If yes, which parts do we need to modify?
1. Diversify Anchor text (as you mentioned).
2. Diversify Tier 1 with forums, edu blogs...?
3. Stop Xrumer & Scrapebox blast?
4. .....

Also, can you explain this suggestion (step 9):

Why don't we mainly (e.g 40%) link to the page targeted for the keyword (step 2).

Thank you very much. Indeed, you are inspiring me after the Penguin hit!

OK, here's my take on this Google zoo. It might not be entirely correct but it's kind of good
baseline to evaluate your website.

Firstly, Google hit high PR blog network starting from home page links and finally getting to BMR
and other networks. In my opinion, this is a police action, not some sophisticated algorithm
change. They can't possibly seriously screw high PR without messing up. They whole freaking
system is based mainly on this thing. High PR links work very well. Only that you don't use public
networks anymore. Build something for yourself. It is neither hard nor too expensive.

Secondly, they did the Penguin. A few pages ago I was talking about NOT putting contextual links
inside UNRELATED content. This is, in my opinion, was the main target together with not varying
anchor text enough and not targeting inner pages or targeting pages with the content not related
to anchor text. In short, before Penguin with enough links you could rank any page, nowadays on
page content matters.

Google pretty much just enforced some good practices I was aware of ages ago. Basically, use high
PR links sparingly, use original or well spun ON TOPIC content for tier one (don't scrape'n'spin), link
to inner pages. Make sure if you links to page with "green apples" anchor, the page is about "green
apples" or "granny smith apples", NOT about "red apples" or "pink lady apples". Vary anchor text more.

What I changed in the blueprint:

1. Use 3-5 keywords per cycle and do more cycles. Keywords must be synonyms, long tail versions of
each other or LSI.
2. Link each anchor to the most relevant page on your website. It is safe to send one link to the home
page and another to relevant inner page (as in original blueprint).
3. Do on page properly. Keyword in title, relevant content. It's like SEO 101.
4. If you use high PR links, use it a LITTLE comparing to other links.

That's about it.

Now, here's what I would do additionally to the sites that are important to me:

1. Manual blog comments on high authority blogs at least somehow related to my niche (use pen name,
not keyword)
2. Social profiles on authority sites with brand name and naked links (http://knowem.com to automate)
3. Buy some high authority links like BOTW and Yahoo Directory
4. Use PRWeb.com regularly.

1 & 2 can be automated with a small blog comment blast (with a name, not keyword) and profile blast to
a good vBulletin and PhpBB list (these platforms use generic anchor text). It is a bit risky and I only
recommend it if you're recovering a dropped site and have nothing to lose.

 

[cash202]

hey cash, how are you using bmd now? trying to get the hang of 6 and it doesnt seem to have the ability to randomly select 1 of your accounts to each url like it used to, unless Im missing something?

BMD 6 sucks. I've had it enough with BMD. I now bookmark with SENuke.

 

[cash202]

Thats what I thought. I did find this thread over in the BMD forum that kind of explained it in detail

http://forum.edwinsoft.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=241, in case anyone else wants to take a look.

To sum up this thread. What was easy built it function in BMD 5 is now a manual pain in the arse in BMD 6.

 

[spiritusuk]

OK, here's my take on this Google zoo. It might not be entirely correct but it's kind of good
baseline to evaluate your website.

Firstly, Google hit high PR blog network starting from home page links and finally getting to BMR
and other networks. In my opinion, this is a police action, not some sophisticated algorithm
change. They can't possibly seriously screw high PR without messing up. They whole freaking
system is based mainly on this thing. High PR links work very well. Only that you don't use public
networks anymore. Build something for yourself. It is neither hard nor too expensive.

Secondly, they did the Penguin. A few pages ago I was talking about NOT putting contextual links
inside UNRELATED content. This is, in my opinion, was the main target together with not varying
anchor text enough and not targeting inner pages or targeting pages with the content not related
to anchor text. In short, before Penguin with enough links you could rank any page, nowadays on
page content matters.

Google pretty much just enforced some good practices I was aware of ages ago. Basically, use high
PR links sparingly, use original or well spun ON TOPIC content for tier one (don't scrape'n'spin), link
to inner pages. Make sure if you links to page with "green apples" anchor, the page is about "green
apples" or "granny smith apples", NOT about "red apples" or "pink lady apples". Vary anchor text more.

What I changed in the blueprint:

1. Use 3-5 keywords per cycle and do more cycles. Keywords must be synonyms, long tail versions of
each other or LSI.
2. Link each anchor to the most relevant page on your website. It is safe to send one link to the home
page and another to relevant inner page (as in original blueprint).
3. Do on page properly. Keyword in title, relevant content. It's like SEO 101.
4. If you use high PR links, use it a LITTLE comparing to other links.

That's about it.

Now, here's what I would do additionally to the sites that are important to me:

1. Manual blog comments on high authority blogs at least somehow related to my niche (use pen name,
not keyword)
2. Social profiles on authority sites with brand name and naked links (http://knowem.com to automate)
3. Buy some high authority links like BOTW and Yahoo Directory
4. Use PRWeb.com regularly.

1 & 2 can be automated with a small blog comment blast (with a name, not keyword) and profile blast to
a good vBulletin and PhpBB list (these platforms use generic anchor text). It is a bit risky and I only
recommend it if you're recovering a dropped site and have nothing to lose.

What about the backlink profile of our Tier 1's and 2's. I think we might still be ok throwing spammy links at some of our tiers but the money site and maybe the Tier 1's have to be ultra clean !

 

[cash202]

What about the backlink profile of our Tier 1's and 2's. I think we might still be ok throwing spammy links at some of our tiers but the money site and maybe the Tier 1's have to be ultra clean !

Only if you're afraid of receiving a notification of unnatural links pointing to your links that point to your links.

XRumer and Scrapebox rarely give an unnatural links warning. If you're able to do it, tell me HOW. Because
I've been trying to find a reliable way to get unnatural link warnings for testing. So far, no amount of spam
helped to sink my test domains. No warnings, goddamint.

 

[rugbyjack2005]

Hi Cash,

Since the update, what keywords do you target in the Scrapebox blast and Xrumer blast going to your tier 1 links? Do you just use pen names with the Scrapebox blast or LSI keywords? Likewise with Xrumer, do you target more than 1 keyword or do you not think it matter?

 

[rugbyjack2005]

hey cash, how are you using bmd now? trying to get the hang of 6 and it doesnt seem to have the ability to randomly select 1 of your accounts to each url like it used to, unless Im missing something?

Can you not get a version of BMD 5? I downloaded 6 but the interface was so different i carried on using 5 and put learning v6 on the to do list. It's certainly something i need to look at but the email we got a few weeks back said that BMD 5 will continue working until July sometime. As a general rule I try and avoid using new versions of programs as there are always teething problems and very little info online to help.

Hopefully they will fix the issues with BMD 6 pretty soon