BlackHatWidow
Newbie
- Mar 23, 2012
- 43
- 56
Hey, my niche looks pretty good and is pretty stable. Some good sites that didn't use to rank high (they're not mine) have come up, so that's good for the users.
person: Matt Cutts address: 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway zipcode: 94043 city: Mountain View state: California country: United States of America
Here's Matt Cunts adress as from whois lookup of mattcutts[dot]com:
Code:person: Matt Cutts address: 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway zipcode: 94043 city: Mountain View state: California country: United States of America
If somebody shot him from a distance with a sniper there would be ~10K suspects at the moment. I was considering this myself but I'm far away in Lithuania.
Congratulations you just found the address to Google's headquarters. Do yourself a favor and don't post on this board again. Talk of killing someone...a joke or not...is unacceptable.
Yes, it is. But I was going to do it, update or not. SERPs aren't reliable long term, as I said. SEO also takes too long.
Whether you are doing what G wants to hear or not, there is a point at which the ROI of SEO becomes so small that it's not viable to generate a significant income. In the old days you could turn on Scrapebox, blast once and rank like magic for loads of keywords, with shit content. That's a good ROI. It's getting increasingly difficult. Once my automation tools no longer work, I will not entertain SEO as the ROI would not be worth it for me. My SEO budget for each site is 50 bucks, I get a good ROI with automation. Fuck paying overpriced SEO companies thousands of dollars to do SEO on a site, whether the links are "good quality" or not. This is a business. I don't care about ranking no 1 for my ego, I just want the money.
Similarly, while I do hate Google and Matt Cunts, I wouldn't avoid Adwords just to spite them. If I can get a good ROI from it and make big profits with it, the only loser would be me if I did not use it just to spite Google. (It wouldn't make a difference to them). Furthermore, Google is not the only provider of paid traffic, there are loads of sources.
Come on, don't be such a pussy.
G wants us to shift from organic traffic to paid traffic...
G wants us to shift from organic traffic to paid traffic...
Wrong, 80% of my affected sites were easy competition keywords
... Google may be trying to force the PPC upon us, they have actually screwed up their previously user friendly search engine, opening to doors for their competitors to catch up.
Congratulations you just found the address to Google's headquarters. Do yourself a favor and don't post on this board again. Talk of killing someone...a joke or not...is unacceptable.
Fact -- Google has certain arrangements in place with the United States Secret Service
I think what I'm seeing here might be a problem with deep linking. And that's why "thinner" sites survived this better compared to huge sites with hundreds/thousands of pages (and maybe not that much linking done to each page, correct me if I'm wrong). I'm seeing same pattern with my own sites.
Also I've noticed that some of my sites root domains has completely dropped from serps, but some inner pages still ranking (mostly for wrong keywords though and wrong pages, privacy-policy for main keyword for example). Not sure if this means anything, just making observation.
Google now has a feedback form available for Penguin. IF you feel your site was wrongly affected let them know because they care a lot.
You can find the form here: Google doesn't give a F**k Form.
Or, you could like Boycott Evil Google.