Do web 2.0 HAVE to be spun?

[zerofoxtrot]

Does web 2.0 articles HAVE to be spun or is it not required?

 

[Dropdown]

If you want to get an actual link that is worth something from it, then yes. Actually, in web 2.0s, it's best to use 100% unique articles that are readable as well.

 

[maddy_i5]

Yes, it should be spun.

 

[zerofoxtrot]

Hmm any recommended free spinners?

 

[martillo]

If you want to get an actual link that is worth something from it, then yes. Actually, in web 2.0s, it's best to use 100% unique articles that are readable as well.

It's not required but its recommended, to better index and unique content (at least 50%)

 

[acotut]

It is required if you don't want to have dificulties indexing the web 2.0's.I also had WAYYY better pushes from highly spunned articles,then 30% unique ones.

Spinner Chief 2 is in beta phase now and it's free.I simply love the software and it might be the only competitor TBS haves...

 

[shura17]

Yes you can.

 

[CloneX]

You should. Google does not like the same article linking to one site from different sources. Keep in mind, G's not so dumb to not catch simple phase replaced spun content. You need to spend some real quality time spinning articles at word level + sentence level + paragraph level for maximum quality and uniqueness.

 

[zerofoxtrot]

Ah, can you still submit multiply articles to one site like Squidoo for multiply backlinks?

 

[CloneX]

Ah, can you still submit multiply articles to one site like Squidoo for multiply backlinks?

You can but it is not recommended at all. Better is to spin it very professionally, or use Ultra Spinnable Articles, by Vita Vee. They are unbeatable!

 

[zerofoxtrot]

You can but it is not recommended at all. Better is to spin it very professionally, or use Ultra Spinnable Articles, by Vita Vee. They are unbeatable!

Ah I only have $5 to dispose on my PayPal for SEO, so won't be using "Vita Vee's". By the way I was talking about multiple different unique articles on one website.

 

[CloneX]

Ah I only have $5 to dispose on my PayPal for SEO, so won't be using "Vita Vee's". By the way I was talking about multiple different unique articles on one website.

If the variations are quite unique, then you can use it. But if you simply spin it at word-level and expect it to work wonders, you are just bluffing yourself.

 

[zerofoxtrot]

If the variations are quite unique, then you can use it. But if you simply spin it at word-level and expect it to work wonders, you are just bluffing yourself.

Don't worry I'll spin my articles like there's no tomorrow, thanks for your help!

 

[CloneX]

Don't worry I'll spin my articles like there's no tomorrow, thanks for your help!

Cool. Do send me the article if it's about SEO. I might use it as well.

JK. Best of luck.

 

[intime]

the best spiner

 

[martillo]

Ah, can you still submit multiply articles to one site like Squidoo for multiply backlinks?

The answer is link diversity, you need links from a variety of sites and platforms
if come from the same IP no counts like different backlinks

2-3 squidoo lens are just fine

 

[strawlink]

I use to make Web 2.0 with only unique contents, it gets boost in serp(Tested and Proven). Content is the king

 

[azizsalim]

Are web 2.0 still works for building quality backlinks ?

 

[futurestic06]

Of course. to make the link authentic and powerful each of the web 2.0 have to be individual. At least make them unique to pass copy scape.

 

[maddy_i5]

I use to make Web 2.0 with only unique contents, it gets boost in serp(Tested and Proven). Content is the king

How many web2.0s do you create ? and how long is your content? 500 words?
Unique content in web2.0s seems like a lot of work!