What tools submit to document sharing sites?

Hey guys,

just wanted to let you know that we're realeasing a new update for Rank Whizz in the coming days, to all those of you who have purchased, you'll be promted about the update when you start the software.

Tom


After this update Rank Whizz is completely usless. Nothing works properly. Unfortunately your "next de-update" (comming back to the previous version) did not help at all. So I have purchased the software, which does not work at all. What now?
 
Ok, well i'm considering going for Rank Wizz which seems to be a powerful way to send documents over the documents sharing website.

However within the review, he talks about High PR backlinks, good for SEO but the links pop out only after people has downloaded the document.

Is google seeing those backlinks ? If yes, a few explanations would be great.

Yea i want to know this, because these posts could be pointless
 
so glad i bumped into this post

I have seen some good result with posting docs. Though previously I used to post them manually.

Downloading free version.....
 
Hello,

we have fixed this issue, and it will automatically update on re-start!

Sorry about the troubles!

Tom

After this update Rank Whizz is completely usless. Nothing works properly. Unfortunately your "next de-update" (comming back to the previous version) did not help at all. So I have purchased the software, which does not work at all. What now?
 
Actually, there are 12 sites which allow clickable links:

scribd
issuu
slideshare
calameo
keepandshare
edocr
box.net
pdfcast.com
viewdocsonline.com
doxtop.com
thinksfree.com
myplick.com


Following document sharing sites don't allow clickable links:
docstoc
crocodoc
Gazhoo
wiziq
wepapers
docspal
txtbear
youblisher

Following sites require downloading:
tagmydoc.com
qshare.com
Ziddu.com
divshare.com
filesanywhere


However, All sites are SEO friendly. There's an interesting fact that the links are disabled on the flash player of website not on the actual document. Search engines work differently, they don't crawl the documents from flashplayer, but directly from the source file/actual document of flash player.

for example: On youblisher.com there's no clickable link, however if you check the source code of webpage you can see a link to original document. which search engine can index and parse easily.

So, for search engines active links doesn't matter on the website and same with the sites which require downloading.

The clickable links are only useful for driving real traffic. The main real traffic come from big sites like scribd, slideshare, issuu etc. which does allow clickable links. In this respect docstoc.com lefts behind.

Hope this information helps.

Tom


Yea i want to know this, because these posts could be pointless
 
This update has not changed much.

So I'm still getting the same errors:

I'm getting now a lot of errors while sending documents (project running), e.g. "Failed: Please add some document body", "Failed: Please specify document title". It is all in the "Automatically Fetch and Post Document" option.
 
I might be very n00bish with this, but is there a way to choose which profile you want to use for a project?.. right now it seems to random pick any of the available accounts.
 
Actually, there are 12 sites which allow clickable links:

scribd
issuu
slideshare
calameo
keepandshare
edocr
box.net
pdfcast.com
viewdocsonline.com
doxtop.com
thinksfree.com
myplick.com


Following document sharing sites don't allow clickable links:
docstoc
crocodoc
Gazhoo
wiziq
wepapers
docspal
txtbear
youblisher

Following sites require downloading:
tagmydoc.com
qshare.com
Ziddu.com
divshare.com
filesanywhere


However, All sites are SEO friendly. There's an interesting fact that the links are disabled on the flash player of website not on the actual document. Search engines work differently, they don't crawl the documents from flashplayer, but directly from the source file/actual document of flash player.

for example: On youblisher.com there's no clickable link, however if you check the source code of webpage you can see a link to original document. which search engine can index and parse easily.

So, for search engines active links doesn't matter on the website and same with the sites which require downloading.

The clickable links are only useful for driving real traffic. The main real traffic come from big sites like scribd, slideshare, issuu etc. which does allow clickable links. In this respect docstoc.com lefts behind.

Hope this information helps.

Tom

No, don't check the HTML source code, this is NOT what the Googlebot sees!

Check the Google chached version of a page.

You will notice that Googlebot doesn't see the Scribd backlinks at all. They are missing from the cached version of a Scribd page.

Same thing with Slideshare and with a lot of other doc sharing sites.

So how is for example Scribd useful for SEO purposes, when Googlebot doesnt crawl the backlink at all?
 
I used the search function to find a good pdf submitter.

Was ping-pong-ing between rank whizz and doc marketing robot, first has 26 sites, second only 11... grrr

Anyway, at a blackhatter's suggestion, the creator of rank whizz added /bhw in the URL and now we can buy rank whizz for 59$... cheapish!

I'll buy it now and go make the $ back off fiverr! :-X

basically kicksoftwaredotcom\RankWhizz\bhw (RankWhizz, not rankwhizz - beware! it's case sensitive)

Too bad the owner of rank whizz doesn't market his product on bhw as well :)
 
Tom, I am interested in RW and the BH discount is very much appreciated.

Question: There was a discussion in cache20 long thread about using Nitro? for PDF to preserve links? Can you shed some lights on this? Do we need to create pdf using special s/w?

Q2 [edit]: Does the tool output links, so we can ping them, bookmark them?
 
Is it even worthed then to create a links from these kind of properties?
 
No, don't check the HTML source code, this is NOT what the Googlebot sees!

Check the Google chached version of a page.

You will notice that Googlebot doesn't see the Scribd backlinks at all. They are missing from the cached version of a Scribd page.

Same thing with Slideshare and with a lot of other doc sharing sites.

So how is for example Scribd useful for SEO purposes, when Googlebot doesnt crawl the backlink at all?

I don't agree with you. I can see links from scribd in webmaster tool, so google do see them.
 
One thing that I suggested to the creator was adding a full sentence, not just an anchor link to the end.

For example "to find out more of this click here" instead of "dog training" link the pdf.

Also, putting the link at the start of the article or maybe right under 1st paragraph.. that'd be even better!

Also, having no control on 'go keyword, spin synonyms, upload'.... better merge 3-4 EZA, create a pdf and spin it using TBS! quality!!!!
 
How many of doc-sharing sites you have included in DMR let for active link in your PDF?

around 9 of the sites.. but google indexed the content anyway not the flash content.. so they still get indexed..

The software also allows multiple scheduling options.. you can generate 'x' number of out put files from a spun article and select a folder to be posted with a delay value and a set of schedules are created for that folder of files with 'x' days delay between posting..

All urls can be tested in the links manager and also exported in csv format..

If you need a code use 'dmrwarrior' in the cart to get the software at the reduced price of $49
 
Back
Top