GUIDE - How I Power Up My Tier 1 Web 2 Links

And you find that theyre enough juice to outrank the competition? And the web 2.0 dont outrank your MS if u thrust thousands of BL their way?
 
1. I manually build web2 sites and point a link to my money site. I usually use the following high PR web 2 sites, squiddo, wordpress, blogger.com, weebly.com, typepad.com, webs.com, I usually build around 10 web 2 sites. If I think I need to, I will build another 10 web 2 sites a week or so after the first batch (And I usually get someone on fiver to do it manually).

Could you point (here or in a pm) to someone on fiver that does a good job with this?
 
And you find that theyre enough juice to outrank the competition? And the web 2.0 dont outrank your MS if u thrust thousands of BL their way?

Most of the time I can outrank the competition. Sometimes the web2 sites outrank my money site at the begining, but over time my money site rises above them. I dont only build web 2 sites to my money site, I diversify my links so I try to build as many different types of links as I can, and slowly

Could you point (here or in a pm) to someone on fiver that does a good job with this?

I have ordered from elizabethmundu & seospecialist2 recently and have been happy with the quality
 
All the links you create are low profile links, which tend to work less and less these days.

I don't think one would rank medium to difficult keyword with this method... how about your keywords you rank with this method?

P.S. You're engaging Scrapebox/Scrapejet/Senuke for 2/3 weeks for just one campaign... it means it's very time consuming and you can manage not more than one website per month.
 
He said its low to medium competition...

Agreed on the timeframe part, BUT, if it gets u results...

As far as the backlinks, how many, say after a month or two, do u have pointing towards ur MS?

I do a pyramid, wikis to web 2.0 to other web 2.0 or MS. I bookmark the webs and a few wikis and then blast all the tiers with SB. The problem Im starting to have with a few sites is that a) the 2.0 outrank my MS and b) Im finidng it very, very very difficult to get my BL indexed
 
26 000 wiki sites?

I have found just around 2 k mediawikisites that work. I personally created footprints for media wiki sites, i first got around 50K sites, but when checkes all, removed captcha and those that are postable, i got just aroiund 2k postable wikis.
 
May I ask you if the PR of your web 2.0 sites in the network changes after you do this process?

Thank you for an answer in advance.
 
What type articles of tier 1, spun or high quality?
 
All the links you create are low profile links, which tend to work less and less these days.

I don't think one would rank medium to difficult keyword with this method... how about your keywords you rank with this method?

P.S. You're engaging Scrapebox/Scrapejet/Senuke for 2/3 weeks for just one campaign... it means it's very time consuming and you can manage not more than one website per month.
Hi, yes forum profile links are low value, but they add to link diversity. Better to have them then not to have them I think. In a normal run I will target more than 1 url / keywords. Lets say I have a website about dogs, I want to rank 4 keywords such as "dog leads, dog training, dog food, dog mats" so I will create 4 articles on my site (Different urls) I will then build 10 web 2 sites to each page then use the above methord, That way I will build links with relevant anchors.

He said its low to medium competition...

Agreed on the timeframe part, BUT, if it gets u results...

As far as the backlinks, how many, say after a month or two, do u have pointing towards ur MS?

I do a pyramid, wikis to web 2.0 to other web 2.0 or MS. I bookmark the webs and a few wikis and then blast all the tiers with SB. The problem Im starting to have with a few sites is that a) the 2.0 outrank my MS and b) Im finidng it very, very very difficult to get my BL indexed

I find that using scrapebox is good for indexing links, but this area is what I want to improve on, This is why I want to test with a backlink indexing site.

26 000 wiki sites?

I have found just around 2 k mediawikisites that work. I personally created footprints for media wiki sites, i first got around 50K sites, but when checkes all, removed captcha and those that are postable, i got just aroiund 2k postable wikis.

I downloaded all the wiki lists i could find on this site and then used scrapebox to remove duplicate domains. I then set the captcher service to captcher sniper

May I ask you if the PR of your web 2.0 sites in the network changes after you do this process?

Thank you for an answer in advance.

Yes PR usually changes to PR1-2 after a few months

What type articles of tier 1, spun or high quality?
I scrape an article and spin it with 70% uniqueness, when I move on to the next web 2 I scrape another article and spin it as well. So all web 2s have different spun articles
 
You forgot to include your referral links to respective websites of the softwares!

Damn, this looked like a good guide in the beginning but then it turned into hell.
How am I supposed to run all those campaigns if I don't have $1000 to invest?
Not to mention the proxies and PC power needed to run all those.
And if you get a penalty then you're fucked.
 
The method is pretty much what I am doing, but I emphasize on quality not quantity. I am student in UK so I have some past courseworks of around 3000/4000 words, I also collect such past CW from friends and so I have unique content that is not uploaded anywhere, which is great. The only problem is that my keyword is not figuring there. So what I do is change one of the keywords in the essay, for example I am doing economics and I change economy, or output, or exchange rate and put my keyword and its variations. Then I made few 400-700 words articles out of the coursework. I posted them to Web 2.0. Then wait few days to being index and start slowly to build links, only manual ones from AA article directories, bookmark sites, social networks. So generally I have about 7-12 web 2.0 all unique and I start linking them for around a week. Everyday I ping all the links that I have, I believe that doing that Google may crawled some of them more than once. After every web 2.0 has about 10 links i continue only pinging them for another 2/3 days and that's the moment when I start progressing a lot in the serps.
If you are not a student just find some online to give you his works for a few bucks (I am offering a pound for 1000 words and I have no problems buying 20 000 words easily). Another option is to give few bucks to someone and he to copy write a part of journal or book (first check if it is online).
 
for web2.0 what url u create? keywords or just nickname
 
Damn, this looked like a good guide in the beginning but then it turned into hell.
How am I supposed to run all those campaigns if I don't have $1000 to invest?

Not to mention the proxies and PC power needed to run all those.
And if you get a penalty then you're fucked.
how did it turn in to hell?? How are you going to get a penalty?? I am not building 10,000's of spammy links over night to the money site. I have posted quality content on the web 2s and am sending "Spammy diverisied links" to the web2s which will not cause a penalty to your money site.

I have not invested $1000, probally half of that. But how do you expect to get results if you dont invest??

I use a high spec PC at home to run all these programs. + I use 10 x semi dedicated proxys which I pay $10 for a month


The method is pretty much what I am doing, but I emphasize on quality not quantity.

I completely agree, On the web 2 sites I create I usually try to post a high quality article. After it has been spun sometimes I read the article to make sure it is readable
 
I've seen a couple of times where people have said that their Web 2.0s sometimes outrank their MS for a short bit and wondering why that would be. From what I've read, the Web 2.0's should never be on the same keywords as your MS.

As an example:
The money site is: White Picnic Tables
Web 2.0 articles should be general articles on Picnicing - with links to 'White Picnic Tables' (and other keywords for diversity) to your MS.

The Web 2.0s should NOT be optimized for any keywords, ESPECIALLY not your keywords - but just an informational on the same general topic, right?

That way, it makes it more like your site is an authority and the money sites should never outrank your site on the keywords your targeting cause they're only being used on the outgoing links.
 
I actually believe that's not a big deal if your web 2.0 outrank the main site. Even if that happens it will be only temporally and after few weeks you will just have a strong blogs pointing to your main site that have gain some authority and trust from Google, as they have been at the top of SERPs.
 
Totally agree. Make sure your web 2.0s don't get deleted though.
 
This is the most useless thread ever, this is recycled news he build a link pyramid for a low traffic keyword.
You can suck up to him but that doesn't make him a good writer

jbarrett learn to write
 
How do you write to wordpress.com and make it stick. They are tough with self promotion.
 
Back
Top