peterbond2
Newbie
- Feb 2, 2012
- 5
- 0
i am pretty newbie, but to me it seems that many linkwheels are not save for long term consideration.
problems:
~~~~~~
1. if you have your moneysite, then tier1 & 2 and do comment-blasts, etc. to tier1 (and maybe tier2)
wouldn't it be easy for a good program to find out that it is all made up, as almost every single site in the linkwheel has backlinks to at least 2 other sites in the linkwheel? Wouldn't we need some Web2.0, Social Bookmarks, etc. that only link to 1 single site in the linkwheel?
2. aren't the sites within the link wheel generally too much interconnected? in naturally grown sites there would probalbly be many more gaps in the wheel and less links from one site to others within the linkwheel and also many more links to other sites outside the linkwheel.
3. the moneysite often gets many backlinks in a very short time period and then it stops. also those backlinks are from tier1,2 sites which also got many backlinks in a very short time.
even if we try to focus on diversity, good programs should be able to easily track all this.
What do you think?
my planned linkwheel looks like this: (i am newbie, so dont expect much)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
it doesen't consider the above questions much.
i would appreciate if the pros tell me things i could improve in the wheel and also the plan below.
L0 = Moneysite
L1 = Tier 1 <- Web2.0 & Articles
L2 = Tier 2 <- Web2.0 & Articles
L3 = Tier 3 <- Web2.0 & Articles
- SB-blasts to L2 & L3
- High-PR Bookmarking to L0, L1
- General Bookmarking to L2, L3
didnt want to spend too much time on drawing arrows, but i think its easy to understand.
Link wheel
~~~~~~~
joshuamolina156.blog.c_o_m
(without spaces!)
problems:
~~~~~~
1. if you have your moneysite, then tier1 & 2 and do comment-blasts, etc. to tier1 (and maybe tier2)
wouldn't it be easy for a good program to find out that it is all made up, as almost every single site in the linkwheel has backlinks to at least 2 other sites in the linkwheel? Wouldn't we need some Web2.0, Social Bookmarks, etc. that only link to 1 single site in the linkwheel?
2. aren't the sites within the link wheel generally too much interconnected? in naturally grown sites there would probalbly be many more gaps in the wheel and less links from one site to others within the linkwheel and also many more links to other sites outside the linkwheel.
3. the moneysite often gets many backlinks in a very short time period and then it stops. also those backlinks are from tier1,2 sites which also got many backlinks in a very short time.
even if we try to focus on diversity, good programs should be able to easily track all this.
What do you think?
my planned linkwheel looks like this: (i am newbie, so dont expect much)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
it doesen't consider the above questions much.
i would appreciate if the pros tell me things i could improve in the wheel and also the plan below.
L0 = Moneysite
L1 = Tier 1 <- Web2.0 & Articles
L2 = Tier 2 <- Web2.0 & Articles
L3 = Tier 3 <- Web2.0 & Articles
- SB-blasts to L2 & L3
- High-PR Bookmarking to L0, L1
- General Bookmarking to L2, L3
didnt want to spend too much time on drawing arrows, but i think its easy to understand.
Link wheel
~~~~~~~
joshuamolina156.blog.c_o_m
(without spaces!)
Last edited: