The site in the example doesn't show for me lol maybe it's been manually reviewed already
The site in the example doesn't show for me lol maybe it's been manually reviewed already
What I don't get is why the site owner didn't spend more time on the actual site. It was obviously profitable enough, why not make it look like a legitimate site and have more chance of passing a manual review, they only had one nav link..
They must have had the budget to pay a pretty decent designer to build something really awesome.
Ditto. I bet the owner of that site will thank Eppie for his blog post. Probably just cost him $XXX,XXX assuming those rankings were relatively stable.
how could he really make it more legit than geico?
buy a blue gecko instead of a green one... lol
The truth is that the site maker knew the risks.... and took them.
but I am sure he was expecting the deindexing.... and probably was working on several other sites at the same time....
the loss of the site..... was just the cost of doing business for him.
Ditto. I bet the owner of that site will thank Eppie for his blog post. Probably just cost him $XXX,XXX assuming those rankings were relatively stable.
Yeah I would call/email him just to say thanks for fucking up the whole freakin' thing.
I'm sure SEOMoz guys don't have anything to do with that Keyword - they were just "uncomfortable" seeing a BH site ranking above a big brand...
How high was that trash ranking before the slap?