Everyone's been talking about these three competitors, many people comment only using one of the three. I have used all three and have properly tested them to at least give each program a fair chance.
In detail my experiment:
Review of GSA:
The PROS:
CONS:
Result of Test
1400 links posted - 800 or so confirmed with a breakdown of (70% Guestbook 20% Blogs 10% forums)
Scrapejet
PROS:
CONS:
Results:
About 2200 submitted 1000 or so confirmed.
No Hands SEO
PROS:
Cons:
Results:
50000+ comments?? about 1700 verified.
CONCLUSION
No verdict. WHAT? WHY?
Well because they are all good programs, so long as they continually listen to customers demands each and every program will be developed into a better product.
BUT I will rank them on DIFFICULTY OF USE (Least to Most):
Price (highest to lowest)
Updates since I purchased?
Responses from Developer?
LIC PER PURCHASE
(2)Two across the board, though I haven't confirmed GSA if it can be more than two.
In detail my experiment:
- All programs run on private proxies
- All programs run for 24 hours
- Home computer - 100mbs internet
- Two office computers - 50mbs
- Same keywords
Review of GSA:
The PROS:
- Multiple platform support.
- Captcha Sniper Support
- VERY diversified URLS / Domains
- Multi-threaded
- Updates almost every day (or so I have seen)
- A very good high percentage of links were indexed.
- "Do Follow / no follow" notes on verified links.
CONS:
- Still buggy - directory almost gets no posts
- Forum platforms work, but need manual captcha inputs, basically useless- Don't feel justified to use my DBC account (I'll rethink this while messing around with settings)
- Setup is convoluted and not well planned. Anchor texts should be customizable for each platform and not centrally placed
- Logs are almost nearly impossible to understand wth it's doing. Would be nice if logs were seperated- I did this by separating ONE project into individual projects (aka each project was one platform).
- No real description of how their search algo works...
Result of Test
1400 links posted - 800 or so confirmed with a breakdown of (70% Guestbook 20% Blogs 10% forums)
Scrapejet
PROS:
- Simple and easy to setup
- Captcha Sniper Support
- Definitions allow the program to be trained to other blogs
- Multi-threaded
CONS:
- Thread maximum of 60? Don't understand why
- Maximum keywords is 3? Don't understand why
- Scraping goes through each platform seperately (you will notice the platform 1/6 in the bottom status bar) should be randomized on which platform.
- No Pinging/indexing mechanism
- Scrapeboard leaves a bad taste in your mouth.
- Start and Stop mechanism, I consider a stupid software design.
Results:
About 2200 submitted 1000 or so confirmed.
No Hands SEO
PROS:
- Very easy to use
- Multi-threaded
- Captcha Sniper Support
- I like the ability to choose how many threads are searching vs posting - worthy idea and prevents proxie overusage
Cons:
- Doesn't allow training for multiple platforms.
- Fair amount of comments, but little verified
- Maximum 150 thread count (again, I don't agree with software developers putting a limit- these programs should be developed on an architecture to utilize the server/computer its being used on)
Results:
50000+ comments?? about 1700 verified.
CONCLUSION
No verdict. WHAT? WHY?
Well because they are all good programs, so long as they continually listen to customers demands each and every program will be developed into a better product.
BUT I will rank them on DIFFICULTY OF USE (Least to Most):
- ScrapeJet
- NHSEO
- GSA
Price (highest to lowest)
- GSA
- NHSEO
- Scrapejet
Updates since I purchased?
- GSA (3 in the last two days)
- Scrapejet/NHSEO
Responses from Developer?
- GSA - Seems to be very good, no one has complains
- Scrapejet - Again, I don't like how this guy shy's away from Scrapeboard - Communicate to your customers properly of why it failed - its basic crisis management communication, please have onus to deal with the one's who purchased.
- NHSEO - Seems to be very good
LIC PER PURCHASE
(2)Two across the board, though I haven't confirmed GSA if it can be more than two.
Last edited: