Just tested UNF v1.4.20, but still not happy with the results.
I tested it on a small sample of high traffic and high CPC keywords, and would expect the results to be Hard or Very Hard.
In fact, UNF v1.4.16 (prior to the change in Competitive Analysis) shows them all as Hard.
But UNF v1.4.20 returns the following results,
4 keywords - Very Easy
8 keywords - Easy
2 keywords - Moderate
4 keywords - Hard
7 keywords - Very Hard
Some of the keywords returned as Easy or Very Easy are,
- stock photos images (550,000 searches, USD7.78)
- stock images photos (550,000 searches, USD8.19)
- stock photos and images (550,000 searches, USD8.23)
- images stock (673,000 searches, USD8.06)
Unbelievable! These are high traffic and expensive keywords. Even Google's Keyword Tool mark them as Highly Competitive. But UNF v1.4.20 says they are Easy.
I was very happy with UNF until you changed the Competitive Analysis. I'm guessing that your new version now queries Bing instead of Google, hence we no longer need Google enabled proxies.
Please I'm trying to rank in Google, not Bing. And please bring back the old and reliable Competitive Analysis. I'm happy to play around with proxies, find new fresh ones, and feed them to UNF every 2 to 3 hours. It's a little bit more work but at least I do get good and reliable results.
Right now, the results are just useless to me...
BTW, the new version only runs 5 threads simultaneously. The old version (v1.4.16) runs 50 threads and it WAS fast!
Sorry, UNF v1.4.20 is just slower (than the old version) and the results less accurate and unreliable...