Bobbylove's RANKING DOMINATION 2012 EDITION

[adward]

isnt sending 20k scrapebox blast a little much for the aged domain? isnt that asking to be penalized?

Be sure to use as many kws as possible. I usually use more than 20 kws for sb blasts.

 

[MrBeastsOnToast]

this maybe where i went wrong with this method and possibly my aged site got deindexed from a blast. (im totally speculating about this btw, have 0 proof - but i cant see many other things that could have gone wrong.)

if i search for "agedsite.com" its visible in the serps, if i search for site:agedsite.com no pages found :-/

 

[AGman]

this maybe where i went wrong with this method and possibly my aged site got deindexed from a blast. (im totally speculating about this btw, have 0 proof - but i cant see many other things that could have gone wrong.)

if i search for "agedsite.com" its visible in the serps, if i search for site:agedsite.com no pages found :-/

Thast what Im saying, I would expect this to be a little to much, but then again, what do I know. I guess I will play it safe and just wait for the aged domain to be indexed naturally.

 

[MrBeastsOnToast]

Thast what Im saying, I would expect this to be a little to much, but then again, what do I know. I guess I will play it safe and just wait for the aged domain to be indexed naturally.

like i said, dont base anything of my input - i really have no idea at the moment. Others have done bobbys method fine with great results.

 

[HelloInsomnia]

If 20k scrapebox blast was enough to penalize sites everybody would be sandboxing each other just for the hell of it.

 

[MrBeastsOnToast]

If 20k scrapebox blast was enough to penalize sites everybody would be sandboxing each other just for the hell of it.

agreed - which makes trying to figure out whats gone wrong even harder

 

[deviatus]

The last panda update was March 5, 2012 with the anchor variation penalty, which a partner and I realized.

There was an anchor variation penalty long before this. What evidence is there to pin it on such a narrow aspect, and not the dozens of other things that G could penalize for?

Just because you and a few other people with crappy anchor variation got hit doesn't prove anything.

There are so many variables coming together when a site gets hit, that when you analyze a group of people with sites that got hit, it could be for a completely different reason for each person. One commonality between a limited sample doesn't equal causation. Lots of people were using PBN's, blogroll links, GA, web20/wiki/sb blasts, profile/comment blasts in they're dumb..etc.

 

[bobbylove321]

Okay and this is coming from a guy who has what credibility? Have you ranked for competitive keywords within 24 hours?

Have you ranked for "dating", "hip hop", "acne", "weight loss", "uggs" etc. niches on the first page?

Didn't think so.

Do not be calling people dumb when you have not ranked in competitive markets.

There was an anchor variation penalty long before this. What evidence is there to pin it on such a narrow aspect, and not the dozens of other things that G could penalize for?

Just because you and a few other people with crappy anchor variation got hit doesn't prove anything.

There are so many variables coming together when a site gets hit, that when you analyze a group of people with sites that got hit, it could be for a completely different reason for each person. One commonality between a limited sample doesn't equal causation. Lots of people were using PBN's, blogroll links, GA, web20/wiki/sb blasts, profile/comment blasts in they're dumb..etc.

 

[AGman]

The "how to lose weight fast" and "how to get rid of acne" sites are no longer there on the first page.

How to lose weight fast, is on the 1st page....result 5

 

[deviatus]

Okay and this is coming from a guy who has what credibility? Have you ranked for competitive keywords within 24 hours?

Have you ranked for "dating", "hip hop", "acne", "weight loss", "uggs" etc. niches on the first page?

Didn't think so.

Do not be calling people dumb when you have not ranked in competitive markets.

You have to admit the reasoning you use to make your pronouncements looks for certitude when there isn't any there. Looks for causation when there's just correlation among small groups, ignoring hundreds of other variables. It's sloppy, and misleading a lot of people.

What serious SEO thinks the last Panda was all about anchor text diversification, when it came to backlinks? When that penalty already existed.

I like that you're really into SEO and look at it from a deeper perspective than most people, but from seeing a few of your posts, how are you not the Alex Jones of BHW?

How long do we have before a handful of huge companies control every Top 10 in the serps?

 

[jurky]

How to lose weight fast, is on the 1st page....result 5

I think that was not his website.

 

[sampo1time]

Bobby this method works great to get to the front page. But most of my sites are landing around position #5-9. To push the site up to #1-3 do you just buy more ALN links?

 

[bobbylove321]

Like I said, talk to me when you rank for a competitive keyword.

You have to admit the reasoning you use to make your pronouncements looks for certitude when there isn't any there. Looks for causation when there's just correlation among small groups, ignoring hundreds of other variables. It's sloppy, and misleading a lot of people.

What serious SEO thinks the last Panda was all about anchor text diversification, when it came to backlinks? When that penalty already existed.

I like that you're really into SEO and look at it from a deeper perspective than most people, but from seeing a few of your posts, how are you not the Alex Jones of BHW?

How long do we have before a handful of huge companies control every Top 10 in the serps?

 

[Nato1]

If i do a site: check i see that google has indexed the 1000 word article on the aged domain but it still shows in the index the pages from the previous content. Why google keeps in its index the old content when the domain has a new content now?

i have a similar problem. my aged domain shows my new article in the preview, but when i click on "chache" it shows the old site before i bought it. also on the google results page it shows the old title and old description of the page.
i guess it is not indexed yet and i cannot 301 redirect the site, right? i already got sb links and got the site retweeted and pinged. anything else i can do to make the site get indexed faster?

2nd Question:
after i redirected the old domain, do i have to wait until the redirect is also indexed by google before i get backlinks to new domain?

 

[bobbylove321]

Bobby this method works great to get to the front page. But most of my sites are landing around position #5-9. To push the site up to #1-3 do you just buy more ALN links?

No.

I would diversify with some other High PR Networks like Cyber Rankingz or BHW User: flx89 service.

 

[bobbylove321]

i have a similar problem. my aged domain shows my new article in the preview, but when i click on "chache" it shows the old site before i bought it. also on the google results page it shows the old title and old description of the page.
i guess it is not indexed yet and i cannot 301 redirect the site, right? i already got sb links and got the site retweeted and pinged. anything else i can do to make the site get indexed faster?

2nd Question:
after i redirected the old domain, do i have to wait until the redirect is also indexed by google before i get backlinks to new domain?

Honestly, people are making it look very hard.

It is VERY EASY.

You simply wait until the 1k article gets indexed on BOTH the main site and the aged site.

You then simply do the 301 redirect.

There is no constant waiting.

The whole process should take 3-5 days MAX and that includes buying the aged domain as well.

 

[deviatus]

Like I said, talk to me when you rank for a competitive keyword.

Do you show proof of your rankings? Every guru wannabe has-been or never-has-been has claims of glory in the past.

I've ranked "sextape" and "celebrity sextape" in the 1-5 positions. I've been doing this since 2006. Mostly target medium-competition keywords in high volume, and probably make more than if I targeting high-comp and spent all my time on that.

And I spend most of my time working, not trying to be a guru on the forums.

Saying "I ranked hip-hop!" doesn't take away from not knowing what you're talking about.

 

[AInfil]

this maybe where i went wrong with this method and possibly my aged site got deindexed from a blast. (im totally speculating about this btw, have 0 proof - but i cant see many other things that could have gone wrong.)

if i search for "agedsite.com" its visible in the serps, if i search for site:agedsite.com no pages found :-/

Looks like my aged domain is also deindexed as well, it was indexed 2 weeks ago back to the drawing board.

 

[templbi]

I figured I would post my results since I recently have used this method on two sites.

First site Info:
EMD: Yes
Allintitle results: 2,210


Rankings for top 10 keywords I'm gunning for:
Keyword1: 13
Keyword2: 9
Keyword3: 20
Keyword4: 26
Keyword5: 26
Keyword6: 36
Keyword7: 36
Keyword8: Not ranking
Keyword9: Not ranking
Keyword10: Not ranking

Second site haven't finished his steps yet. Ill post info when I do.

 

[xtro]

Bobby, just to be sure... are you using allintitle: with or without quotes around the keyword?

Also, why aren't you using other operators, especially allinurl: since you place such importance on EMDs?

Xtro