BH Just Need Some Advice

[SeoMiami]

Hi All,

I am into White Hat mostly where I do obtain links from other high PR sites, buy advertisement space on PR6-8 sites, etc.. etc... it does work, however I also do a small percentage of Black Hat SEO as well, such as link wheels, scrapebox, xrumer to tier 1, 2, pinging... etc... however I bought all the services before.

Now, I do own all the software and do play around with scrape box, others are just sitting with no use (just because I have no time).

Anyways..... here I come...

I have done 100 Web 2.0 Properties (MANUALLY with real UNIQUE Content on each of them that was written by my writer)

After 1 month, only 30-35 are indexed. As we all know Google is getting smarter and smarter! I have tried to index others, but no luck.

What would you suggest me do next in order to create the best linkwheel. I would like not to have any footprints of course and make it pretty big. I would agree to go tier, 2, 3, and 4 if needed - but whats the best approach you would suggest.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thank you!

 

[MBW007]

I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable than I can chime in but if I had that many available, I would be thinking something like

site1 -> site2 -> site 3 -> .. -> site99 -> site100 -> $$$

Also, PM me your URLs and I will run them through Linklicious

 

[LakeForest]

Oh my gosh, don't link your 100 2.0's to your moneysite . Think of a very complicated pyramid where your money site links to a very diversified type of sites with high PR. Link to social media, link to high PR blogs, link to video site(just examples here) and link your web 2.0s to those sites. You keep links to your moneysite very high quality over quantity.

Excellent work with the unique content, that will be a huge help to you in the end.

Make sure you're submitting your sites and doing the steps to help with indexing (sitemap/robots).

Give some more details on your plan and we can figure out why more aren't indexed. You could be getting better returns if you linked in a more 'chaotic' structure (reduces footprint)

 

[SeoMiami]

Thank you !~ I do have linklicious.. and that does not help either

I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable than I can chime in but if I had that many available, I would be thinking something like

site1 -> site2 -> site 3 -> .. -> site99 -> site100 -> $$$

Also, PM me your URLs and I will run them through Linklicious

 

[markhenry121]

Submit your site in social sites to index faster and make your keywords less competitive.

 

[SeoMiami]

Thank you. Links to my money site are only high quality from famous pr5,6,7 blogs some sitewide and some HP only. We should be at PR5/6 with next upgrade hopefully.

However, I need to work on my web2.0. I did give them some scrapebox blasts (not heavy... 20-40 links each - one of them even became PR2!)

So what exactly should I do with web 2.0 for the best attack ?

My indexed web2.0 sites are like

wikia.com
posterous.com
goarticles.com
weebly.com
articlesnatch.com
blackplanet.com

... etc.. etc...

THANK YOU!

Oh my gosh, don't link your 100 2.0's to your moneysite . Think of a very complicated pyramid where your money site links to a very diversified type of sites with high PR. Link to social media, link to high PR blogs, link to video site(just examples here) and link your web 2.0s to those sites. You keep links to your moneysite very high quality over quantity.

Excellent work with the unique content, that will be a huge help to you in the end.

Make sure you're submitting your sites and doing the steps to help with indexing (sitemap/robots).

Give some more details on your plan and we can figure out why more aren't indexed. You could be getting better returns if you linked in a more 'chaotic' structure (reduces footprint)

 

[flist]

Have you continued to add content to them, or are they just 1 post Web 2.0s? Adding more content might aid with the indexing. Also, it's pretty common to just dump all of the black hat stuff on the tier 1 sites, so you could try Scrapebox and social bookmarking blasts, as well as anything else of the sort. Social bookmarking is meant to aid with indexing, so maybe that should be your route, especially if all of the content is unique.

Thank you !~ I do have linklicious.. and that does not help either

 

[SeoMiami]

They are one post, but post of them only allow one post (such as articles...)

I have about 15-20 Squiido unique articles but NONE of them are indexed.

To be honest, I was thinking about Tier2, 3... can someone explain how that should be done and what should be linked to what?

Thank you!

Have you continued to add content to them, or are they just 1 post Web 2.0s? Adding more content might aid with the indexing. Also, it's pretty common to just dump all of the black hat stuff on the tier 1 sites, so you could try Scrapebox and social bookmarking blasts, as well as anything else of the sort. Social bookmarking is meant to aid with indexing, so maybe that should be your route, especially if all of the content is unique.

 

[flist]

There is no specific guide about what should be linked to what. You're using massive amounts of lower quality links to drive traffic to links pointing at your site which in turn passes link juice to your site.

A general guide would include spun articles and blog comments for tier 2, pointing at the tier 1 sites. Your anchor texts should not be the same as the ones on the tier 1 sites, because you don't want the tier 1 sites to rank for your keywords, you want the money site to rank.

Building a linkwheel is far less important now than it ever was, so you can probably skip that. It creates more of a footprint for Google. I mean, that's just a starting point, but I would suggest doing a lot of research and coming up with a plan to promote your own sites. Your specific methods for tier 2/3 links aren't hugely important, because many of the links are going to wind up being disposable anyhow when Google sees them as spammy. Still, they serve a purpose.

They are one post, but post of them only allow one post (such as articles...)

I have about 15-20 Squiido unique articles but NONE of them are indexed.

To be honest, I was thinking about Tier2, 3... can someone explain how that should be done and what should be linked to what?

Thank you!

 

[SeoMiami]

Thank you...

So would you suggest to link different types of links... profile/article/web 2.0 to my Tier 1 and then send scrapebox/xrumor links to those....

So what do you think has more value... a link Pyramid like that of 100 sites! or 1 Sitewide VERY STRONG PR6 link? (Not spammy sites, but a real link with 10 yr old domain that has over 500,000 visitors monthly?)

There is no specific guide about what should be linked to what. You're using massive amounts of lower quality links to drive traffic to links pointing at your site which in turn passes link juice to your site.

A general guide would include spun articles and blog comments for tier 2, pointing at the tier 1 sites. Your anchor texts should not be the same as the ones on the tier 1 sites, because you don't want the tier 1 sites to rank for your keywords, you want the money site to rank.

Building a linkwheel is far less important now than it ever was, so you can probably skip that. It creates more of a footprint for Google. I mean, that's just a starting point, but I would suggest doing a lot of research and coming up with a plan to promote your own sites. Your specific methods for tier 2/3 links aren't hugely important, because many of the links are going to wind up being disposable anyhow when Google sees them as spammy. Still, they serve a purpose.

 

[flist]

Those links can go to tier 1 or tier 2, but the biggest blasts should be the furthest out from your money site, generally speaking.

A lot of low quality sites in a link pyramid are almost always going to have less value than an actual high PR site or authority blog. If you read around this forum, you'll find people ranking their sites with a small number of high PR links. This isn't true for everyone, but if you really want to survive future Google updates, you're going to want quality over quantity. Quality, unique content will always outrank spammy content.

If you get links from high PR sites where other people also pay to place links, there is always the chance of the site getting indexed and you losing those links entirely. Just some food for thought.

Thank you...

So would you suggest to link different types of links... profile/article/web 2.0 to my Tier 1 and then send scrapebox/xrumor links to those....

So what do you think has more value... a link Pyramid like that of 100 sites! or 1 Sitewide VERY STRONG PR6 link? (Not spammy sites, but a real link with 10 yr old domain that has over 500,000 visitors monthly?)

 

[floombus]

Thank you. Links to my money site are only high quality from famous pr5,6,7 blogs some sitewide and some HP only. We should be at PR5/6 with next upgrade hopefully.

However, I need to work on my web2.0. I did give them some scrapebox blasts (not heavy... 20-40 links each - one of them even became PR2!)

So what exactly should I do with web 2.0 for the best attack ?
7
My indexed web2.0 sites are like

wikia.com
posterous.com
goarticles.com
weebly.com
articlesnatch.com
blackplanet.com

... etc.. etc...

THANK YOU!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk