theindiaphile
Senior Member
- Jul 26, 2010
- 831
- 247
Will take a professional if you still have space at the discounted? Looks promising..
I ordered as one of the first in this thread and it took quite a long time to get my report. But that was the only downside of it. The report is very well structured and I already got some nice results! I ordered it for 1 keyword and 2 keywords(almost the same) jumped from #7 to #4 and then to #2. The Link diversity of this service is awesome and so are the results!
I had ordered 6 packages before 17 days ago and today i got my first report for the first package. There was delay ( i forgot that i had ordered the service), but no problem for this, i prefer the service to be quality.
When i saw the report i was amazed, everything is made in a brilliant way. Now i am waiting to see results.
When you finish the work i want to order 2 more packages.
Best Regards
Review of Service:
BHW Exclusive l All in One Linkbuilding Services l Huge Link Diversification
This is a preview of my review for the beginner package. It does not include results for SERP movement because the work has just been finished. A follow up review will include this information.
I would like to preface this review about what I believe a review should be. A review is not a thank you for service or a thank you for a discount. It is put in place to help others get a better idea about what the provider delivers. In addition I do not just through out top ratings for so so or even good service. To get a five star rating (top rating) the provider must really wow me.
Also note the revised information in this review is from issue that I discovered and brought up with Warrior 66, the service provider, and he corrected.
Because this is an all in one package I will cover each type of SEO work.
Content
2 Unique articles of 400+ words each with 100% CS Passed
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
These articles are well done. They are all readable and do not scream that they are spun content. The only reason they did not get 5 out of 5 stars is because a trained eye can tell that they are spun content. Another minor complaint I have is some of the content is inaccurate, but this is only a minor issue and not pertinent to SEO.
They are of high enough quality that they can generate traffic on their own from normal readers.
Direct Links
10 Forums x 5 Posts = 50 Posts
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
It is very obvious that these were all done manually. All of the content in the post is relevant to the subject matter. In addition all comments were made on high PR forums. up to PR6.
The amount promised was 10 forums and 50 posts. I received 15 forums and 75 posts. Which makes an over delivery of 50%
My only criticism for this part of the service:
- Integrate the link better in to the signature
- add pictures to the profiles
- used aged profiles.
This will make the post seem more likely from real users which would generate more. These are minor details. The quality of the forum posts is still very high.
10 PR 1 - PR 5 Blog Comments
Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
These were very typical blog comments. They were all manually done and relevant and some accounts were created for high PR domains. But the quality ends there. Many of these comments are on posts with a ton of comments. Some of the worst ones have 157,000 (PR5)/ 40,000 (PR4) / 20,000 / 8,000.
I expect that if someone is manually making blog comments they would find really good ones to comment on with very few other comments.
There were some with comments as low as 20 other comments.
The only reason why this did not get rated lower was because of the over delivery:
The actual delivery was:
1 - PR 7
1 - PR 6
3 - PR 5
1 - PR 4
11 - PR 3
A total of 18 Blog comments instead of the promised 10.
500 Directory Submissions
I will add the review for directory submissions in my final review. This will give some time for the submissions to be published.
15 Spoke Pr4++ Profile Links Wheel
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
The only part of this service that was quality is that all of the profiles are created on PR 4 - PR 6 and there was an over delivery of 30%. Instead of 15 spokes there is 20.
The main problem I had with this linkwheel is that I found it was broken. Meaning one of the submitted profiles did not exist. Another was on a site that was down (not really in warrior66s control).
Second, the profiles were bare. They are all identical on each site with one interest, occupation and location. No avatar picture was provide. These are very generic. Almost no manual effort was put in to them. They are comparable to a xrumer link wheel.
50 Approved Articles
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
There is a lot of value here. This is where the nicely spun articles are published and put to work. I would say that this and the web 2.0 properites are the back bone to the entire service.
There was an over delivery of 25%. Instead of 50 articles I received 63.
My critique for this section:
- add bio information and profile picture for authors
- Improve the PR of article directories. Over half were PR0 only four were PR3 and above.
15 High PR Profile Links
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
The over delivery on this section was 18 instead of the promised 15. The PR on the forums is okay.
Given that this part of the service highlight High PR profiles I find it puzzling that I got better PR from the profile link wheel than I did this part of the service. The highest PR I found was PR 6 and only two of them. Most of them were PR4. This is the first part of the service I was actually disappointed about. You can get the exact same results by running xrumer against an mediocer list of forums.
Revised Update: Warrior 66 is going to look in to ways to improve this. Possibly spin different bio information.
My critique for this section:
- Some PRs are miss represented in the report. Actual was lower than reported.
- Misspellings in profession on profile
- Very Little Bio information. To add value to ?High PR? profiles I would expect some good data in the bio information. Even if it was spun.
- All profiles are exactly identical. Misspellings and all.
5 Edu / GOV links
Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
Over delivered by 100%. Instead of 5 links he provided 10. The PR on these sites is nice and high.
These are all profile links and they suffer from all of the same profile link problems that other parts of this service suffer from.
My critique for this section:
- Non English sites
- edu.xx
- No bio information
- Misspellings
5 Web 2.0 Properties
Rating: 4.9 out of 5 stars
These are very well done. 5 Were promised, 10 were delivered. They used one of the two spun articles. Relevant pictures added. On very good PR sites. In my opinion this is the best part of the over all service.
My critique for this section
- Add more content to bio
- Make bio information relevant to the keyword or customer website.
50 wiki posts
Rating: 4.0 out of 5 stars
These are pretty well done. They also utilize the well spun document.
My Critique for this section:
- The PR of almost all the wikis is n/a or 0. It would be nice to have some better quality here
- Add some pictures to the wikis like the web 2.0
5 Module posts
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
Domain PR is good. Spun article is good. Over delivered by 100%
My critique for this section:
None English
Only one was .com, all others were foreign
50 Social Bookmarks
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
Revised Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
The report shows an over delivery of about 25%. But there were 25 of the bookmarks that did not work at all. From the book marks that are working they are not spun via title or content. This makes them far less effective.
I notified Warrior66 of this problem and he will deliver more bookmarks. I will re review this section in my follow up review
Revised Update: Warrior 66 resubmitted the book marks. The final number I had was about 85 total bookmarks which is a good amount over delivered to compensate for the original shortage.
My critique for this section:
Find a different person to submit book marks for you.
- Spin the titles with keywords
- Spin the description
- Use aged accounts
- Use/mix in more popular book marking sites like digg and stumble upon.
Indirect Links
5000 Xrumer profiles
Rating 3.5 out of 5
The over delivery of this was about 25% extra successful links. The profiles used different bio data and properly had indirectly links built.
My critique for this section:
- Most sites are non English and in Russian
- Profile information was no more than one word in the four fields
- It would be nice if there was a way to add long tail keywords for this part of the service.
2000 SB comments
Rating 0 out of 5
When I used the scrapebox link checker using all of the links in the report only 74 of the 4000 had a link.
I reported this to Warrior66 and he is going to look in to it and probably redo this part of the service.
Revised update: Warrior 66 resubmitted another 4085 SB comments only 108 came up on the SB link checker. There seems to be an issue with SB that he is looking in to.
Note that some links may not be live yet because they have not yet been approved, but that number should not be a significant ammount.
Total Links promised by service: 7755
Actual Links provided: 7260
820 Quality links, 6440 indirect links. This is assuming all of the directory submission go through.
Revised links provided: 7420
All links are on any pages with out Page Rank. Any exception to this would be a front page link that will roll off with in a short amount of time. Based on the service description this is what is expected.
Report Data:
Rating 4.5 out of 5
The reports were excellent. All of the data including login information was made available and easy to access.
My critique for this section
- Add hyperlinks for the URLs in the report.
Summary
Over All Quality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
There are some real good strong points to this service. Mostly the areas that use the well spun articles. like the Web 2.0?s, Article Submission, and Wiki. Other areas of the service fall short. Like the social book marking and scrape box. Others are just okay and I would expect a lot more from a service promoting quality links. Like the High PR profile links and the edu / gov links.
I believe that warrior could tweak a few things by adding quality SB lists and spending a little more time spinning data for profile bio?s and social bookmarks and then this service would be truly excellent.
As far as working with Warrior 66 he is professional and he really does want to please the customer. I?m hoping that he takes this review to heart and makes the changes necessary to improve the service. Even if it means raising the cost some.
As stated by other customers. The turn around time for this service has been very poor and the communication from warrior has been below average. Right now I attribute this to him being overloaded with work from a new BST.
My biggest problem with this service is that I received this great report about all the links I got but upon inspection many of the links, even the quality ones, were broken. When speaking with Warrior 66 on Skype he mentioned that he checks his links before delivering the report. So I?m at a bit of a loss as of to whether he was cutting some corners by not really checking the links or cutting corners by letting broken links slide. I would like to believe that he was just busy and missed the broken links. Only reports from other members will help us really know one way or the other.
When I started this service my keyword ranks was #4. I attained that rank mostly through my BMR service and half a dozen fiverr gigs. It is currently still #4. I will post a final review with updates and SERP movement. This is only the first part of the service review which covers quality. The second part of the review will cover the results.
If you have a service that you would like me to review please send me a PM.
Thanks a lot buddies for your awesome and well detailed reviews. Your suggestions really help me to polish myself. I will try my best to improve my service towards excellent. BTW in SEO sometimes sh*t happens but I am always here to replace & replace as well as rectified & rectified.