The construct is great for creating vast amounts of single paragraph spins. I'm unsure where the limit is with it honestly, my guess is you could create 500+ paragraph variations with 10-15 feeder paragraphs (that read basically the same). You could, if you felt like it, create master indexable article files, tens of thousands of sentences long (and 1mb or more!) that would always be indexed, which are great for tier2 links where quality matters a lot less
I normally find that 3 times the amount of para's required in the final construct is sufficient if you use plenty of in-sentence spintax. Obviously, if you use less spintax, and more sentence substitution, then you need more volume for variety. I've built UberCubez with over 100 paragraphs (of which only 5-9 get used each time) and around 6 sentence alternatives where we've not done a lot of spintaxing; and I also have some very succesful 'Cubez' that only have 20 para's (5-7 are used) and 4 sentence rewrites - but with each sentence fully spintaxed.
The perm's are just massive - and I know we've discussed this before, but my basic example is:
If you create 4 rewrites of each sentence, use 3 sentences per paragraph and braces spin each sentence into 5 parts with 4 spins each, then you have nearly 69 Billion permutations of that
paragraph alone (4^5 x 4 = 4096: 4096^3 = 68.7B.) If you have 10 paragraphs, and only use 5 in a mixed order, then this number gets gigantic. To all intents and purposes, you'll be able to use it almost indefinitely.
I have Cubez that I built 4 YEARS ago, that are still going strong on weekly submissions. Everything get's indexed (unless it's nothing to do with the content!)
The link coder is useful as hell, at least as far as time saving
definitely will save you a minute or two! I like the set of tools, all of them are useful. Link extractors in particular are highly useful if you're like me and scrape d0follows through the rel tag...
I love the Link Coder - it's one of my fav's - and most people miss the fact that it takes care of your over-optimisation issues automatically; as it extends your phrase-matched anchors out to loads of variations.
You know how I am a slave to quality though, at least on things that link back to my money sites!
And that's why you BANK buddy... Quality and effort always shine through...
Your title builder is excellent btw, albeit not too readable
The trick with it is to use short action-based verb/noun keyword groups...
Entering 'how to lose 10 pounds' will generate awful titles, as there's too much wording there. Using 'Losing weight' or 'weight loss' or 'aquarium building' etc means that it can use the full scope of pre and post-fix phrases at it's most effective. Entering to many adjectives can really mess up the readability. It's best to keep it to really core/tight headline keywords and let the algo do the extension out to long-tails.
I'd love to see an incredible "storage" facility program for spintax... where you could store sentences as you write them, in a database and access them when creating/spinning articles later on the same topic. Great for authority driven guys like myself
I've considered building something like this; but I keep coming back to the fact that i want UberCubez to be fully workable from a simple txt editor. I keep massive libraries of content - as I know you do, and I love the fact that I can whizz around in NotePad2 (or whatever your favourite txt editor is,) and build constructs really quickly, without being reliant upon an online connection or service.
Anyway, it's so CHEAP for the monthly fee, I really doubt I'll be shutting down my subscription right now. Just thought I'd mention a few things that could be improved with regards to the Ubercubez construct
;-) Thanks for vote of confidence buddy! I value all constructive feedback, as it helps us to see outside our own 'blinkers' that we view the world through!
J
