My SEO Blueprint (SENuke, AMR, BMD, Xrumer, Scrapebox)

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you begin by writing a unique 500+ word article, what is purpose of spinning that same article? Thanks (btw rep + thanks given for your thoroughness)

You wouldn't want to post exactly the same article to 1000+ directories, would you?
 
You wouldn't want to post exactly the same article to 1000+ directories, would you?

Rightio. So with one article, how many spun versions do usually make from it?
 
This is all explained in the very first post (point 16). One anchored links goes
to random Web 2.0 property (as a result they are all got hit) and one link
goes directly to the money site with no anchor link. I also explained why is
it so somewhere on the page 3-4 on this post.

I'm trying to get a handle on this as well.

I now have a list of around 30 or so web 2.0's inc Youtube, Scribd links etc.

If I am to have one anchored link to a "random web 2.0 property" then the only way I can think of doing this is to spin all 30+ web 2.0 urls in my AMR resource box.

Is this what you mean ?
 
Last edited:
Rightio. So with one article, how many spun versions do usually make from it?

What exactly do you mean by spun versions? I can generate 10000 or
100000 if I want to. Each article is composed of three articles spun by
paragraph and then with an inner spin added by TheBestSpiner.

I have a sample here http://www.seoblasts.com/sample.txt
 
spiritusuk said:
I'm trying to get a handle on this as well.

I now have a list of around 30 or so web 2.0's inc Youtube, Scribd links etc.

If I am to have one anchored link to a "random web 2.0 property" then the only way I can think of doing this is to spin all 30+ web 2.0 urls in my AMR resource box.

Is this what you mean ?

Yes, that's right. Spin all Web 2.0 links (plus money site link) in AMR
resource box.

spiritusuk said:
Also with the Xrumer blast-how do we get the blast to go to all of our tier 1 properties (or tier two). I know with a drip feed you can rotate the urls on a daily basis but with a one off blast I'm not sure if they'd let you

If you outsource, outsource to provider who supports unlimited URLs and
anchor texts. You just give them list of URLs and a keyword and they
blast links to all URLs randomly.

If you're doing a blast yourself, in XRumer project in site field and signature
field use #file_links macro. It is probably a good topic for that video course
of mine that doesn't yes exists but basically you put all URLs of Web 2.0
and AMR articles to one text file, say "C:\Work\homepage.txt" and put
BBCode links to another file (say "C:\Work\signature.txt") one per line like
this:
PHP:
[url=http://www.web20-1.com]keyword[/url]
 [url=http://www.web20-2.com]keyword[/url]
  [url=http://www.amr-1.com]keyword[/url]
  [url=http://www.amr2-2.com]keyword[/url]
When you create a XRumer project use #file_links macro.

In homepage field use: #file_links[C:\Work\homepage.txt,1,L]
In signature field and post field use #file_links[C:\Work\signature.txt,1,L]

This way it will pick a random link every time it creates a profile.

spiritusuk said:
I PM'ed you about the copycat by the way :)

It's funny that he omitted XRumer. People there probably get brainwashed
that XRumer is very dangerous spamming tool that gets you banned,
hehe :)
 
It was never suggested. You don't have to have an UNIQUE article for each
Web 2.0 but the article you use MUST BE SPUN, and spun well.

Sorry but this is where I'm getting confused.

I've read through all thirty pages at least 3 times taking notes along the way and on this point there is some confusion (at least on my part).

In response to a question on page 23

"Is it the same spun article across each of the web 2.0 sites? "

Your reply is:

"The same spun article. I used one article for everything when I first posted the blueprint. Since then I've started to use two when, I think, Expertpeon said he had better results with two articles. One for Web 2.0s and another for AMR. "

But on page 6 in response to a question

"Anyway, I have question, when you say you submit your spun article to several sites manually i.e Step 9, is it the same article or for each submission its spun? If its the same, isnt there going to be any duplicate content penalty?"

Your reply is

"New spin for every submission. It is the same article but every time new
spun version is submitted."

I hope you get where I'm coming from. Is it a new spin per each Web 2.0 site or the same spun article distributed to all our Web 2.0's ?
 
It's a new spin for each Web 2.0 properties.

I believe what Cash202 meant was that initially he used only 1 article (spun heavily) for all blasts, e.g. manual Web 2.0, SENuke Web 2.0, AMR. But later he changed the strategy to use 2 articles, each spun heavily too. One article is used for Web 2.0 blasts (manual & SENuke), the other is for AMR blast.

I did 1 cycle for my new domain. After about 2 weeks it went from not in the top 1000 to 57 in Google. Not bad at all for a start.
 
It's funny that he omitted XRumer. People there probably get brainwashed
that XRumer is very dangerous spamming tool that gets you banned,
hehe :)

I certainly wouldn't advise omitting it, if you have the tool.
I have been renting Xrumer and using it on a VPS for the last 2 months (I may just buy it this month though, now that I learned it and want to keep it).
Scrapebox is a lot better for link juice than it, but a link is a link when it comes to boosting web 2.0s and your AMR blasts!

Also that copycat guy is a douche.

Haha, nice!
Hilariously, I just realized how crazy I actually am.
My articles are 10-20 times as long as this now!
 
Last edited:
spiritusuk said:
I hope you get where I'm coming from. Is it a new spin per each Web 2.0 site or the same spun article distributed to all our Web 2.0's ?

What does spun article mean to you? What do you call spun article?

I call spun article what you can see here http://www.seoblasts.com/sample.txt

You can post it to 1000 sites and each site gets an "unique" version of this
particular article.
 
Expertpeon said:
I certainly wouldn't advise omitting it, if you have the tool.
I have been renting Xrumer and using it on a VPS for the last 2 months (I may just buy it this month though, now that I learned it and want to keep it).
Scrapebox is a lot better for link juice than it, but a link is a link when it comes to boosting web 2.0s and your AMR blasts!

After I saw the speed at which XRumer does the job, there's no turning
back. Scrapebox IS SLOW. Seriously. I didn't see any speed improvement
whether I run 20 threads or 300. On my dedicated server hooked into VPN
(so the speed is a little bit slower because of that) with 300 threads I get
300 links per minute on average on a verified list. Dirty list runs at 800-1000
links per minute. Incredible.

Expertpeon said:
Also that copycat guy is a douche.

To me, if someone starts to blatantly rip you off, this means success.
All successful people I know (who don't keep their mouth shut) get ripped
off :)

Dude actually PM'd me there and said he didn't rip me off. Who knows,
maybe I just found my double :D
 
Last edited:
What does spun article mean to you? What do you call spun article?

I call spun article what you can see here
You can post it to 1000 sites and each site gets an "unique" version of this
particular article.

It's probably a mix up with the terminology.

Regarding your example link I would personally refer to that as a "pre-spun" article as the article has not been spun yet.

Once you generate those 1000 articles then I would refer to them as a "spun article".

Anyway, it's kind of splitting hairs but it was causing a blockage in my understanding of your system which I believe I now understand. In other words, a different SPUN article to be posted to each Web 2.0.

Therefore I can write one single 500 word article, spin it to give me 20 different versions and then submit each of those versions to my web 2.0 tiers ?

I think these might be my final questions before I can say I have your strategy buttoned up......

If I'm targetting a single keyword and I complete a full cycle and see no movement after a month or so would you then start a second cycle for the exact same keyword ? If so, then if I understand correctly I need to write a fresh article, spin it and then submit the spun articles to the SAME web 2.0's.

If the keyword is competitive and I have to do several cycles for it then does this mean my web 2.0's will have several articles on them with each article having the same anchor text back to my money site ?

Final question now.....:)

With the Web 2.0's you mention two links. Something along the lines of "one to root page of money site" and "one to the page where your targetted keyword is".

What if my homepage IS the page that I'm targetting for my keyword. Would you use two anchor texts for the same keyword and the same page or would you mix it up a little.

Thanks for all your time and help !

P.S. to everyone else. I've been compiling a list of the main techniques employed by people across a few SEO forums and the common denominator is the use of Web 2.0's.
 
whats the best way to check our backlinks that we just created via this method?
 
whats the best way to check our backlinks that we just created via this method?

You're best looking at your GWT link list about 10 days after running a cycle. Majestic SEO doesn't seem to show the links for 20-25 days, which is long after the date you should see some movement in the Google SERPS.

BTW, I outsource this technique to Cash202 through his SEOBlasts brand, sometimes its best to get the expert to do it than try and reinvent the wheel.

-aReJay
 
After I saw the speed at which XRumer does the job, there's no turning
back. Scrapebox IS SLOW. Seriously. I didn't see any speed improvement
whether I run 20 threads or 300. On my dedicated server hooked into VPN
(so the speed is a little bit slower because of that) with 300 threads I get
300 links per minute on average on a verified list. Dirty list runs at 800-1000
links per minute. Incredible.

9 SB instances and my cleaned up lists I can do 2-3 million links/day :eek: Granted I assume these lists are AA still (they were when they were made weeks ago, and I only check them for changes bi-weekly)

Xrumer CAN do more links than this in the same time period, however, I find the juice from 2-3 million links from SB thrown into a 5000 or so web 2.0 pyramid just cannot be beat.
But then again, I use both :p
 
4. Write as many titles for the article as you can (THREE as a minimum). Then spin them with TheBestSpinner and combine together so you have a multi-level spun title.

I did not understand this part. What do you mean by creating a multi-level spun title. And, what do you mean by "titles for the article"? Is that different versions of the article?
 
spiritusuk said:
It's probably a mix up with the terminology.

Regarding your example link I would personally refer to that as a "pre-spun" article as the article has not been spun yet.

Once you generate those 1000 articles then I would refer to them as a "spun article".

Anyway, it's kind of splitting hairs but it was causing a blockage in my understanding of your system which I believe I now understand. In other words, a different SPUN article to be posted to each Web 2.0.

Therefore I can write one single 500 word article, spin it to give me 20 different versions and then submit each of those versions to my web 2.0 tiers ?

Precisely. Moreover, you can also use it with tools like SENuke and Article
Marketing Robot as well (in "pre-spun" form). They will spin it for you as
they post.

spiritusuk said:
I think these might be my final questions before I can say I have your strategy buttoned up......

If I'm targetting a single keyword and I complete a full cycle and see no movement after a month or so would you then start a second cycle for the exact same keyword ? If so, then if I understand correctly I need to write a fresh article, spin it and then submit the spun articles to the SAME web 2.0's.

If the keyword is competitive and I have to do several cycles for it then does this mean my web 2.0's will have several articles on them with each article having the same anchor text back to my money site ?

Yes, no problem with that (despite what others may say about it). However
after 5-7 articles I would create a new Web 2.0 account.

spiritusuk said:
Final question now.....:)

With the Web 2.0's you mention two links. Something along the lines of "one to root page of money site" and "one to the page where your targetted keyword is".

What if my homepage IS the page that I'm targetting for my keyword. Would you use two anchor texts for the same keyword and the same page or would you mix it up a little.

Then point both links to the home page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top